Dog-Fighting or Human-fighting, WHich worse?

Freddy Figbottom said:
I'm talking about abuse and mistreatment to engender violence in a target.

your dumb games are just dumb.
Click to expand...
And you were the one that pretended to understand that "word games" like the one you are playing should make you revisit your moral compass. You're like a four year old asking why the clouds don't fall from the sky and not getting the answer you want so you keep changing the "rules".

If you want a specific answer, then ask the question correctly.
 
Damocles said:
And you were the one that pretended to understand that "word games" like the one you are playing should make you revisit your moral compass. You're like a four year old asking why the clouds don't fall from the sky and not getting the answer you want so you keep changing the "rules".

If you want a specific answer, then ask the question correctly.
Click to expand...
blah. blah.

my questions fine,

you're an assjacking sophist, and bad at it.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
blah. blah.

my questions fine,

you're an assjacking sophist, and bad at it.
Click to expand...
Keep moving the goalposts and pretending you are somehow "elite". I answered the question, and gave you the reason one is worse than the other. It doesn't matter which situation you put it in. If a "man" is being abused by his girl and becomes violent that is his choice. If a dog is abused there was never a time the dog could make a choice.

Now try again and pretend that humans somehow are never responsible for their actions, and that this is the "same thing"... Move the goalposts again and the answer still remains the same. At some point, you cannot excuse your bad actions on the abuse you have received from others, even if you really really want it to be okay.

Let's say you are in a trial for murder, you may get mitigation in your sentence from abuse, but you will not got released because of it, because you are still responsible for your action.
 
Damocles said:
Keep moving the goalposts and pretending you are somehow "elite". I answered the question, and gave you the reason one is worse than the other. It doesn't matter which situation you put it in. If a "man" is being abused by his girl and becomes violent that is his choice. If a dog is abused there was never a time the dog could make a choice.

Now try again and pretend that humans somehow are never responsible for their actions, and that this is the "same thing"... Move the goalposts again and the answer still remains the same. At some point, you cannot excuse your bad actions on the abuse you have received from others, even if you really really want it to be okay.

Let's say you are in a trial for murder, you may get mitigation in your sentence from abuse, but you will not got released because of it, because you are still responsible for your action.
Click to expand...
I'm talking about the abuse tactic, not the legality.

you're trying to move the goalposts, hector projector.

foiled again.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
no i'm not.

you're trying to drill down and make it a consent issue, in err.

your bullshit has failed again.

you're bad at this.
Click to expand...
You wanted to know which was worse, I answered and told you why. It does not matter which context, it is always worse with the one that has no power to consent. Then you've tried to get a specific answer from me by vaguely moving around and trying to dodge the central reality. Humans make choices, the dogs they force to do things do not.
 
Damocles said:
You wanted to know which was worse, I answered and told you why. It does not matter which context, it is always worse with the one that has no power to consent. Then you've tried to get a specific answer from me by vaguely moving around and trying to dodge the central reality. Humans make choices, the dogs they force to do things do not.
Click to expand...
yes.

thank for you contribution, and your answer.

however, i think you arrived at your conclustion through an irrelevant issue, and not the issue I even want to talk about.

the abuse and regimes to make other creatures violent is what I want to focus on.

you don't have to focus on that.

but quit being a belligerent dumbass.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
yes.

thank for you contribution, and your answer.

however, i think you arrived at your conclustion through an irrelevant issue, and not the issue I even want to talk about.

the abuse and regimes to make other creatures violent is what I want to focus on.

you don't have to focus on that.

but quit being a belligerent dumbass.
Click to expand...
If you want to talk about something specific then you should actually talk about it rather than "around" it while actually avoiding actually asking the question that includes the thing you want to talk about.
 
Damocles said:
If you want to talk about something specific, you should actually talk about it rather than "around" it while actually avoiding actually asking the question that includes the thing you want to talk about.
Click to expand...
I have repeatedly discussed my interest in the abuse used to make other creatures violent.

you're the one just meddlesome duncing.

you can't make yourself lie enough to say "that's not happening", like the immoral princess.

that why I like you damo.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
I have repeatedly discussed my interest in the abuse used to make other creatures violent.

you're the one just meddlesome duncing.
Click to expand...
No, you have specifically avoided actually asking anything related to what you want to discuss, while telling others to "stop playing with words" you posted something about fighting, didn't mention anything about "abuse" and then chose to avoid simply asking the question you want an answer to....

You should follow your own advice. If you have to play with words, it is your moral compass that needs a focus, not mine.

Be direct. Ask what you want to know. Do not be vague, if you want to talk about abuse then ask questions about abuse not "dog fighting" compared to "human fighting" with nothing at all about abuse in the OP...

What you've done here is everything you are accusing others of doing. You are acting like the Democrat Party. Accusing others of doing what you are actually currently doing.
 
Damocles said:
No, you have specifically avoided actually asking anything related to what you want to discuss, while telling others to "stop playing with words" you posted something about fighting, didn't mention anything about "abuse" and then chose to avoid simply asking the question you want an answer to....

You should follow your own advice. If you have to play with words, it is your moral compass that needs a focus, not mine.

Be direct. Ask what you want to know. Do not be vague, if you want to talk about abuse then ask questions about abuse not "dog fighting" compared to "human fighting" with nothing at all about abuse in the OP...

What you've done here is everything you are accusing others of doing. You are acting like the Democrat Party. Accusing others of doing what you are actually currently doing.
Click to expand...
I want to discuss abuse used to make other creatures violent.

this is consistent with my op.

you want to take about something else.

consent is a facet, but not really my main thrust.

I can repeat stuff as long as you can, captain lie.
 
Freddy Figbottom said:
I want to discuss abuse used to make other creatures violent.

this is consistent with my op.

you want to take about something else.

consent is a facet, but not really my main thrust.

I can repeat stuff as long as you can, captain lie.
Click to expand...
Then my answer remains the same, the context does not change the response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top