DOGE Heads Musk and Ramaswamy Signal Social Security Cuts Are Coming Trump vowed to “not cut one penny” from Social Security, but his other statements

Earl said:
Well, Walter, do you really believe we would vote for a president who would hurt us?

Really? You far left loons elected a president who hurt the working class and you have lost them, hopefully, forever.

Then you voted for a president who hurt all Americans. Go figure, Walter.

Americans no longer trust you or care what you say, Walter.

How do you like that, Walter?
Click to expand...
Is your autism medicated or do you just serve full crazy all the time?
 
TOP said:
I posted the pictures of the donations given to be taken to NC...I never donate cash...;) As you can see, they asked for supplies...
Animal hospital, in this case, btw...;)
Click to expand...

You did post a picture of alleged donations. However, nothing in your picture supports your claim that you personally donated the items or collected them from someone else, or that they were ever even in your possession. Which of course they weren't, because you found the photos on the Internet. If anyone cared enough, which none of us do, we could park one of "your" photos in a Google image search and find out where you got them. Lucky for you, we have better things to do than debunk your incessant virtue-signaling and public bragging about your pretend generosity.

As Jesus once said in the book of Matthew, chapter 6: "“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.

“So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you."
 
Last edited:
Diesel said:
Preach, sister. I will never understand why @Earl sucks on @TOP's shriveled nipple, but I do know that demon wench is a pathological liar. How dare she invoke the name of charity during the Christmas season knowing full well that she doesn't do anything to benefit anyone, ever.
Click to expand...
I know why. They are both angry and bitter rejects who have found each other here. They live fantasy lives online where everything is like the end of a Disney princess movie. They are lacking in self esteem and are needy attention whores. What kind of sickness infects someone who deliberately bumps a thread where they've been having their phony ass handed to them?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
No, we don't believe that. She used to claim that she got up at 4 am to post on the forum because she went out creeping from one Panera's to another, collecting bread for the poor. Poor = herself, of course. And after that, she went golfing and/or swimming -- while simultaneously posting all morning on the forum. That's the trouble with lying constantly; you just can't keep your stories straight or believable. :laugh:
Click to expand...
@TOP does win first place for being the worst. And her lies are beyond pathological. Someone should study her rotten brain.
 
Walt said:
There is no financial reason that a very rich person needs any earned income, and more than half of them have no earned income. If you have $100 million in investments, you do not need to work 40 hours a week to get another $100k a year. So for those the number would be 0%, which does matter in regards to whether they pay payroll taxes, because it is zero.

Some of the very rich feel the need to control something, and therefore have a job in controlling it. Before Jeff Bezos quit his job, he had a job controlling Amazon. To avoid paying taxes, they generally take the lowest salary possible. The days of a $1 salary are mostly gone, the IRS caught on to that, but they can set their salary very low. So Bezos went with $80k a year.

Cawacko will say that is something, and I will respond that is nearly nothing. It is about 0.001% of his income. More importantly, the tiny amount that the very rich pay in payroll taxes is about one millionth of the payroll taxes.

One millionth of the payroll taxes paid, and yet they benefited from about half of the surplus in payroll taxes.


The concept of working age does not apply to the very rich.
Click to expand...
I’m not even sure the point you are trying to argue here. Is it in debate that there are very wealthy people for whom most or extremely large portions of their income come from investments rather than salary? If yes, who is arguing that? And what is its relevance to the thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TOP
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top