DOGE: Social Security Officially Removes 12.3 Million Individuals Listed Age 120+

DOGE: Social Security Officially Removes 12.3 Million Individuals Listed Age 120+​

111
Elon Musk holds a chainsaw reading Long live freedom, damn it during the annua
SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty
Hannah Knudsen26 May 20253,179

2:03


Social Security has removed from its rolls 12.3 million individuals listed as 120 years old or older, according to the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

The discrepancies in the Social Security figures and the alarming ages of some of the individuals listed have garnered national attention over the last several months.

As a result, in March DOGE began to update the American people on the massive cleanup begun by Social Security. In a March 18 update, DOGE said Social Security had marked 3.2 million social security number holders aged 120 or older as deceased, warning that there was still more work to be done.
Weren’t any, the Trump/Musk lie was debunked as quick as it came out
 
Weren’t any, the Trump/Musk lie was debunked as quick as it came out

If there were not any, then why are you worried about the payments to nobody being stopped?

If there isn't any vote fraud, then why do you object to purging the vote rolls of duplicate names, fictional cartoon characters, and people registered in multiple precincts?

If the "Administrative Over-head" of the USAID isn't 80% of the program budget, then why are you so mad that the new rules require it be no more than 10%?

Clearly, you're one of the people on the take... I hope you are arrested soon.


"There are no Cats in America, and the streets are paved with cheese!"

-
 
Newsweek says the same thing/ Anchovies.
Earl, if you read that article you will find this paragraph, so what Musk is spewing out is very questionable.

In February, Elon Musk brought attention to the out-of-date records by sharing a spreadsheet that highlighted discrepancies. The sheet showed the number of individuals in each age group whose death status was marked as "FALSE!"—indicating they were listed as alive.

According to a report by the Brookings Institution, the absence of a death date "doesn't necessarily mean the person is still alive; it may simply mean the death was never reported." The nonpartisan think tank added that Numident was introduced at a time when "record-keeping was paper-based and less reliable."
 
If there were not any, then why are you worried about the payments to nobody being stopped?

If there isn't any vote fraud, then why do you object to purging the vote rolls of duplicate names, fictional cartoon characters, and people registered in multiple precincts?

If the "Administrative Over-head" of the USAID isn't 80% of the program budget, then why are you so mad that the new rules require it be no more than 10%?

Clearly, you're one of the people on the take... I hope you are arrested soon.


"There are no Cats in America, and the streets are paved with cheese!"

-
No one is arguing against removing names of people not receiving SS payments, but that is not the claim that Trump/Musk echoed, they implied these people were actually getting payments (https://apnews.com/article/social-s...-claims-doge-ed2885f5769f368853ac3615b4852cf7)

Once again, no one is opposed to removing names of people who can no longer vote from registration rolls, it is done yearly, but rather the indiscriminate removal of names/voters, in some districts even including those that has voted in three years

And I have no idea what you are talking about regarding USAID
 
Earl, if you read this article, it does not confirm that their are million collecting SS, it says that the records have not been updated.
Who do you believe is receiving those benefits, Trumper, the man or woman in the caskets or the relatives of them?
 
Back
Top