Citation
Democrats hit rock bottom as party plummets to all-time low: poll
Just 19% of voters questioned in a new national poll give Democrats in Congress a thumbs up on how they're handling their duties, with 72% disapproving.
Citation
Thanks Earlhttps://www.rollingstone.com › politics › politics-news
Jul 16, 2025 — Only 19 percent of respondents to a new Quinnipiac University poll approve of the way Democrats in Congress are doing their job.
Oh, thats different, not the Democratic party generally. Its because they were unable to prevent the huge spending Bill.https://www.rollingstone.com › politics › politics-news
Jul 16, 2025 — Only 19 percent of respondents to a new Quinnipiac University poll approve of the way Democrats in Congress are doing their job.
Can you provide a direct quote? Answer my other questions also.I believe it because it was the finding of the Republicans Senate report, chaired by Marco Rubio. They found that Russia was working to benefit Donald Trump.
That is who leads EVERYONE. The Politicians ARE the party.Oh, thats different, not the Democratic party generally. Its because they were unable to prevent the huge spending Bill.
CitationI believe it because it was the finding of the Republicans Senate report, chaired by Marco Rubio. They found that Russia was working to benefit Donald Trump.
Citation
The receptionist:For whom specifically? Why do you believe that? Did it effect anything? Did the Trump campaign collude with Russia.
Here is the MAJOR flaw.![]()
Bipartisan Senate Intel report backs intelligence assessment of 2016 Russian interference
This is the fourth and penultimate chapter resulting from the committee's more than 3-year investigation into the Russian government's actions.www.cbsnews.com
Correct, but it does say that information was shared by the Russians with the Trump campaign.The receptionist:
I believe it because it was the finding of the Republicans Senate report, chaired by Marco Rubio. They found that Russia was working to benefit Donald Trump.
The report does not say that the election was affected or that Trump colluded with Russia.
Indeed…Clapper too.Here is the MAJOR flaw.
Politics
Bipartisan Senate Intel report backs intelligence assessment of 2016 Russian interference
By Olivia Gazis
Updated on: April 21, 2020 / 2:11 PM EDT / CBS News
The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed the accuracy and integrity of a 2017 joint assessment by U.S. intelligence agencies, who determined that Russia's coordinated campaign to influence the 2016 presidential election was meant to benefit President Trump.
The committee's review is the fourth and penultimate chapter resulting from the committee's investigation into the Russian government's actions, a probe that has spanned more than three years.
In its heavily redacted 158-page report, the committee found that the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) commissioned by former President Barack Obama in late 2016
This is EXACTLY what DNI Gabbard proved was a faulty ICA. They based it on the laughable Steel dossier and 3 other unreliable sources one was an anonymous email. The others were deemed unreliable by CIA and FBI analyst. You really do need to read all the document that have been released. There are more to come. On December 9th 2016 Obama held a White House meeting with Clapper, Bennan, Comey, Rice and others. Until that time the Intelligence Community assessment was Russia had no preference for Trump and was resigned to the fact that Hilary would win. They wanted to foment chaos but not sway the election. Obama told them to write a new ICA saying Russia hacked the election for Trump. The next day there was an article in the NYT because it was leaked to them.
Gabbard has the proof. The DOJ has form a strike force to investigate. Things are about to get serious. I predict at least Brennan will get arrested and charged.
No collusion, as you posted there was and no report that it affected the election.Correct, but it does say that information was shared by the Russians with the Trump campaign.
How did she prove it was faulty? If it was faulty, is there evidence it was intentionally faulty? If there was such evidence did Obama have anything to do with it? If he did, was his involvement criminal and how so.Here is the MAJOR flaw.
Politics
Bipartisan Senate Intel report backs intelligence assessment of 2016 Russian interference
By Olivia Gazis
Updated on: April 21, 2020 / 2:11 PM EDT / CBS News
The Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday reaffirmed the accuracy and integrity of a 2017 joint assessment by U.S. intelligence agencies, who determined that Russia's coordinated campaign to influence the 2016 presidential election was meant to benefit President Trump.
The committee's review is the fourth and penultimate chapter resulting from the committee's investigation into the Russian government's actions, a probe that has spanned more than three years.
In its heavily redacted 158-page report, the committee found that the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) commissioned by former President Barack Obama in late 2016
This is EXACTLY what DNI Gabbard proved was a faulty ICA. They based it on the laughable Steel dossier and 3 other unreliable sources one was an anonymous email. The others were deemed unreliable by CIA and FBI analyst. You really do need to read all the document that have been released. There are more to come. On December 9th 2016 Obama held a White House meeting with Clapper, Bennan, Comey, Rice and others. Until that time the Intelligence Community assessment was Russia had no preference for Trump and was resigned to the fact that Hilary would win. They wanted to foment chaos but not sway the election. Obama told them to write a new ICA saying Russia hacked the election for Trump. The next day there was an article in the NYT because it was leaked to them.
Gabbard has the proof. The DOJ has form a strike force to investigate. Things are about to get serious. I predict at least Brennan will get arrested and charged.
They did not say there was no collusion.No collusion, as you posted there was and no report that it affected the election.
And the CIA found out Russia did not try to influence the election for Trump. Then because of Obama Clapper, Comey, and Bennan started to use faulty intel to turn the narrative 180 degrees and say Russia hacked the election for Trump.https://www.americanbar.org › abanews › 2019/03 › m...
Mueller finds no collusion with Russia
Mar 25, 2019 — Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump's campaign coordinated with Russia.
Yes Mueller did.They did not say there was no collusion.
This is untrue. Mueller found no criminal collusion, because mere collusion is not criminal.Yes Mueller did.