Domestic Terrorists Threaten Justice Barrett and Her Family At Their Home

[Stone]

So if they were protesting the people that live at the house across from the justice's house, it's illegal? Let me see how you weasel your way out of this one.

Its illegal...

 

[Bigdog]

Good. So she had no right to be there. We're making progress.

Is that the new Gestapo rule for all cops? Shoot trespassers on sight?

Many people were trespassing, just like the Stephen Colbert Staffers were the other nite. They had no right to be there either.

 

[AProudLefty]

Its illegal...

"Your Honor, the defendant protested in front of a Justice's house."
"What did they protest about?"
"They protested about the relentlessly gay yard across the street from the Justice's house, Your Honor."
"Uh what???"

 

[Bigdog]

Here we go again.

You expect me to answer your question while you ignore mine.

Was Schumer's statement about the Justices reaping the whirlwind, a death threat?

You left the term "death threat" open only to your own personal interpretation.

 

[BidenPresident]

Is that the new Gestapo rule for all cops? Shoot trespassers on sight?

Many people were trespassing, just like the Stephen Colbert Staffers were the other nite. They had no right to be there either.

She was attacking secure rooms with congressmen. You need to stop lying.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Exactly. The education is for free. You're welcome.

Glad you admit when you are using it.

 

[AProudLefty]

Glad you admit when you are using it.

I never denied it. Heck I even pointed it out in other post of mine just for you.

 

[Bigdog]

She was attacking secure rooms with congressmen. You need to stop lying.

Stop lying. She wasn't attacking any congressmen. And it was a window to a hallway, not a room. She was trespassing as were some others that day, who were not murdered.

All cops should shoot trespassers on sight is what you are still saying.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[T. A. Gardner]

She was attacking secure rooms with congressmen. You need to stop lying.

You are the one that's lying. She was shot in the back as she climbed through a broken window into a hallway by a Capitol police officer, who ignored his training and federal use-of-force guidelines entirely, and even worse, then fled the scene. If she was such a threat, why did the officer who shot her run away immediately after he shot her rather than stay and deal with his actions and the rest of the crowd?

 

[BidenPresident]

You are the one that's lying. She was shot in the back as she climbed through a broken window into a hallway by a Capitol police officer, who ignored his training and federal use-of-force guidelines entirely, and even worse, then fled the scene. If she was such a threat, why did the officer who shot her run away immediately after he shot her rather than stay and deal with his actions and the rest of the crowd?

I have contempt for you traitors.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I have contempt for you traitors.

And, I have contempt for delusional imbeciles who refuse to face reality and facts--like you.

 

[BidenPresident]

And, I have contempt for delusional imbeciles who refuse to face reality and facts--like you.

You never post facts. I think your brain imploded.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

You never post facts. I think your brain imploded.

Then prove anything I said in post #70 wrong with facts.

 

[BidenPresident]

Then prove anything I said in post #70 wrong with facts.

Babbitt had no right to be in the building.

 

[Bourbon]

Hey Dumb Ass, there’s an Umbilical Cord and guess who that belongs to?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Babbitt had no right to be in the building.

Doesn't change anything I stated. Trespass is a misdemeanor, not a felony and in any case she was neither an immediate threat or being violent to anyone when shot. That puts the officer in violation of his training and federal use-of-force guidelines he is supposed to follow.

 

[BidenPresident]

Doesn't change anything I stated. Trespass is a misdemeanor, not a felony and in any case she was neither an immediate threat or being violent to anyone when shot. That puts the officer in violation of his training and federal use-of-force guidelines he is supposed to follow.

It was not trespass.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

It was not trespass.

Then what was it? She wasn't armed. She wasn't attacking anyone when shot. She wasn't given a warning and the officer that shot her made zero attempt to use less than lethal force as his training and federal use-of-force guidelines REQUIRES. So, what crime are you claiming she was committing when shot?

 

[Earl]

"Faith Leaders have since called on the Department of Justice to investigate, prosecute and "publicly condemn these unlawful attacks."

"We call on you to publicly condemn these unlawful attacks; to commit to vigorous efforts to prevent them, and to investigate and prosecute them; and to proactively engage with the affected faith communities to ensure their concerns and security needs are being met," the letter sent to the Attorney General's Office last week by CatholicVote reads."


Why won't Garland prosecute these people who are violating the law.