You tell me what we "all know" first.
Don Lemon
- Thread starter FastLane
- Start date
Yakuda
Verified User
I'm sure that idiots thinks it was because don is a lemon puff
Ok I found the video.
View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTsbzTvjlQN/
That was AFTER the service was interrupted by the protesters.
View: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTsbzTvjlQN/
That was AFTER the service was interrupted by the protesters.
Can reporters go in and film abortion clinics if protesters go in ?
Last edited:
BartenderElite
Verified User
Well, it was fairly predictable that you wouldn't be able to answer.
I think you just like saying the word "centrist."
Yakuda
Verified User
There no need to take anyone's word for it you can watch the footage for yourself
https://www.law.cornell.edu/donate
(2)
by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship;
Did you see the part where the Pastor told him to leave and Lemon did not. He kept interviewing people.
Well...it looks as though all the MAGA morons are here to defend the right of Trump to turn our Republic into a dictatorship with Trump himself as the dicktator.
Good for them. They are assholes...and have every right to conduct themselves as assholes.
Doing a damn good job of it, I must say.
Good for them. They are assholes...and have every right to conduct themselves as assholes.
Doing a damn good job of it, I must say.
He is not charged with entering the church. Though, again, churches are private property and when asked to leave you either do or are then trespassing...
However, that is not what he is charged with. Just as I would not be charged with entering the mythical restaurant you came up with if I went in to rob the store, but my actions would still be illegal. If I were a reporter and followed them in to video it I would be fine, I have no duty to report... However, if we are going to continue this analogy, if I was a reporter and giddily announced we were going somewhere to do something that I could not tell you about then stuck my microphone into the face of the manager as you held a gun on him and demanded the money in your behalf... well, now I've crossed a line and became a participant... even if I told you it was my first amendment right to say things and report on them.
QP!
Verified User
You are doing what Damo is doing.Irrelevant
(2)
by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship; or
18 U.S. Code § 248 - Freedom of access to clinic entrances
www.law.cornell.edu
If you post in the OP list of crimes you and Damo keep stating and simply say 'who will defend someone doing these crimes' we do have this issue.
Instead we start by discussing what a reporter can and cannot do, and you guys cite private property wrongly as a reason he could not enter as a reporter but then when I PROVE you wrong you switch and assert crimes
I love pointing out your lie about being a "Centrist" . So now answer what do "we all know"?
Tobytone
Verified User
I hear you, but you can't let an aggreges act like that go unpunished. Seriously, if we ignored this incident, the victims wouldn't get a chance for justice and the scumbags would not only repeat the same thing in more churches, they'd immediately look for ways to step it up until they got the arrests they were looking for. Also, I don't see anyway they could avoid arresting the little scumbag and keep any credibility.
It isn't subtitled. I'll take your word for it. He could have left.
I have told you what a reporter can and cannot do.
He could have followed them in and filmed them at their nefarious purpose, they would commit the crime and not him. He has every right to do that and no duty to report. However the moment he crossed the line and became a participant he was no longer covered by that "First Amendment" he was so eager to tell the pastor about, but ironically the pastor was covered by that First Amendment....
I then describe what actually happened. I tell you, in your own words: "Things that are crimes are crimes"... because I am telling you what happened.
Aren't they private?
BartenderElite
Verified User
All you're doing is projecting your self-consciousness about being an extreme partisan. You haven't pointed out anything I've lied about, and bringing up "centrist" in non-ideological issues is only a form of projection.
They are open to the public. Aren't Churches privately owned.
They are private in the same way churches are private. You can enter the place legally for its stated purpose, but if you are asked to leave then you must leave or you are violating the law. If protestors invaded them... well, we'd be hearing a whole different thing here now wouldn't we?
You don't understand sarcasm. I guess you just aren't smart enough to understand it.
NOW TELL ME what do "we all know".