T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
How so? I have little empathy for either side in that war. It's none of my business.It does.
How so? I have little empathy for either side in that war. It's none of my business.It does.
To the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence, I'd say it is proven. To one of beyond doubt, no, it hasn't been.Prove it.
What do you think, Biden called Putin and told him to do it?... and the USA (under "Biden's" shadow government) played absolutely NOOOOOOOOOOOO part in that choice...![]()
![]()
![]()
Someone should take it to Court, where evidence would be required... stop pretending.To the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence, I'd say it is proven. To one of beyond doubt, no, it hasn't been.
![]()
Satabank used for alleged $10 million bribe to Hunter Biden from Ukrainian gas firm
Documents from Satabank found in leaked cache of Hunter Biden laptop connecting son of US President to Ukrainian gas firmwww.maltatoday.com.mt
![]()
Hunter Biden's Burisma Malta Account: Emails Reveal Bribery And Money Laundering Concerns
Emails from the laptop associated with Hunter Biden shed light on Burisma’s involvement in opening a bank account for Hunter Biden in Malta in 2016. This development aligns with allegations made by an FBI source suggesting that Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma Holdings, potentially paid...lovinmalta.com
![]()
Attempts by Biden's son Hunter to open account in Malta come under the spotlight
According to leaked documents, the account opening process in 2016 was facilitated by Maltese auctioneer Pierre Grech Pillowtimesofmalta.com
That particular case is definitely one that could be proven in civil court proceedings, and might even rise to the standards of a criminal trial.
Whether it has gone to court or not, the evidence is there and is pretty damning. You just want to use the reductio ad absurdum fallacy to ignore what's plainly in front of you. Bagman was on the take bigtime, and he was enough of a drug addled moron to not be able to cover his tracks.Someone should take it to Court, where evidence would be required... stop pretending.
I do not see any significant evidence. I am sure you pretend to see it.Whether it has gone to court or not, the evidence is there and is pretty damning. You just want to use the reductio ad absurdum fallacy to ignore what's plainly in front of you. Bagman was on the take bigtime, and he was enough of a drug addled moron to not be able to cover his tracks.
I do not see any significant evidence. I am sure you pretend to see it.
If it is true, why wont Bondi prosecute?
Your ilk makes up so much shit, its hard to take anything seriously, especially from unknown sources.![]()
You just refuse to see what's plainly in front of your face.
Don't have to tell me that you don't care.How so? I have little empathy for either side in that war. It's none of my business.
Both the Malta Times, and Times of Malta are newspaper sources local to Malta--that's a country in the Mediterranean. They are known sources.Your ilk makes up so much shit, its hard to take anything seriously, especially from unknown sources.
There is nothing to these stories but innuendo. The guy worked with a now defunct bank, so?Both the Malta Times, and Times of Malta are newspaper sources local to Malta--that's a country in the Mediterranean. They are known sources.
Here's a few more saying the same thing:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hu...rows?msockid=21fbbea4efa763842064acc4ee526280
![]()
Burisma had Hunter Biden help open account with corrupt Malta bank
Hunter Biden coordinated with executives at the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma to open an account at a corrupt Maltese bank, according to emails from the first son’s abandoned laptop.nypost.com
![]()
Hunter Biden and Burisma 'set up account with corrupt bank Satabank'
Ukrainian gas firm Burisma worked with Hunter Biden to set up an account in Malta at Satabank, emails from the First Son's laptop reveal.www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
Hunter Biden ayudó a Burisma a crear una cuenta en el cuestionado banco SataBank en Malta
La entidad financiera fue cerrada tras una investigación de lavado de dinero que involucraba a la empresa ucraniana.voz.us
He cares since he's clearly siding with the Orange Jesus on the issue.Don't have to tell me that you don't care.
The Reds held congress for 2 years of Biden's term. They investigated him nonstop. They promised to find great crimes, and fools like you bought into it 100 percent. There was NOTHING. You still are unable to see the truth. You never will. Joe was charged with nothing. If they found anything, they would have put on a show trial.Both the Malta Times, and Times of Malta are newspaper sources local to Malta--that's a country in the Mediterranean. They are known sources.
Here's a few more saying the same thing:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hu...rows?msockid=21fbbea4efa763842064acc4ee526280
![]()
Burisma had Hunter Biden help open account with corrupt Malta bank
Hunter Biden coordinated with executives at the Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma to open an account at a corrupt Maltese bank, according to emails from the first son’s abandoned laptop.nypost.com
![]()
Hunter Biden and Burisma 'set up account with corrupt bank Satabank'
Ukrainian gas firm Burisma worked with Hunter Biden to set up an account in Malta at Satabank, emails from the First Son's laptop reveal.www.dailymail.co.uk
![]()
Hunter Biden ayudó a Burisma a crear una cuenta en el cuestionado banco SataBank en Malta
La entidad financiera fue cerrada tras una investigación de lavado de dinero que involucraba a la empresa ucraniana.voz.us
That is no proof that the Bidens weren't engaged in quid pro quo and money laundering, instead there's plenty to show they were. Unlike the Democrats, the Republicans didn't bring charges prematurely based on bullshit evidence. They wanted an airtight case. That was necessary to bring criminal charges. Civil charges wouldn't fly for the most part because there was no one bringing a case that could show they were the one(s) harmed.The Reds held congress for 2 years of Biden's term. They investigated him nonstop. They promised to find great crimes, and fools like you bought into it 100 percent. There was NOTHING. You still are unable to see the truth. You never will. Joe was charged with nothing. If they found anything, they would have put on a show trial.
The bank of Cyprus was run by Ross, one of Trump's administration people. One of the presidents of that bank was Putin.
No proof that they did not? You actually typed that? If you claim they did, it is your job to provide proof. Yes, wild-ass right-wing claims are all people of your level require. You should be ashamed.That is no proof that the Bidens weren't engaged in quid pro quo and money laundering. Unlike the Democrats, the Republicans didn't bring charges prematurely based on bullshit evidence. They wanted an airtight case. That was necessary to bring criminal charges. Civil charges wouldn't fly for the most part because there was no one bringing a case that could show they were the one(s) harmed.
Now that Biden's out of office, like with the Clinton's, the Bidens aren't going to get piles of cash to buy their influence as they have no influence to sell anymore. The case is dead politically.
It's the Democrats (and Left) that do show trials. Those only work in a dictatorship which is why they failed against Trump.
There's plenty of proof they engaged in quid pro quo and money laundering. Sorry if I poorly worded that, your ad hominem aside.No proof that they did not? You actually typed that? If you claim they did, it is your job to provide proof. Yes, wild-ass right-wing claims are all people of your level require. You should be ashamed.
What do you think, Biden called Putin and told him to do it?
No. That's you.Silly, you believe every inch of propaganda don't you?
"You can always tell a MAGAt, but you can't tell him much".No proof that they did not? You actually typed that? If you claim they did, it is your job to provide proof. Yes, wild-ass right-wing claims are all people of your level require. You should be ashamed.
No. That's you.
There is absolutely none. Do you think the Reds would have let Joe slide if they had proof? You are so sucked in by right wing sources. the you are completely illogical. Why did they let him go?There's plenty of proof they engaged in quid pro quo and money laundering. Sorry if I poorly worded that, your ad hominem aside.