DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
That's still less than 2 standard deviations.....
The US Census, lol. You must be kidding? The lowest number in studies I have seen put it at 2-3%. You have some other source?....

That's still less than 2 standard deviations.....
The US Census, lol. You must be kidding? The lowest number in studies I have seen put it at 2-3%. You have some other source?....
Because queers and their enablers insist that their behavior is normal, which is a lie. Liars can't be trusted.If it is neither good nor bad then why is it relevant? ....
Because queers and their enablers insist that their behavior is natural, which is a lie. Liars can't be trusted.BTW, why does it matter whether they are untrue to their chosen behavior? ....
Because queers and their enablers insist that their behavior is normal, which is a lie. Liars can't be trusted.
Nah, you just lost the debate is all.More non sequitur bullshit.
Nah, you just lost the debate is all.![]()
For once you're right.Poor Solitary. He's been in the closet so long.
I think Damo was objecting to the legality. We should not throw them in jail for such an act.
Nah, you just lost the debate is all.![]()
Because queers and their enablers insist that their behavior is natural, which is a lie. Liars can't be trusted.
Because queers and their enablers insist that their behavior is normal, which is a lie. Liars can't be trusted.
Not possible when you fail to offer any argument. All you do is make assertions. All of those have been countered and your only response is more baseless assertions.
Normal and natural are issues YOU brought up. I don't ever recall hearing any advocate of equal rights raising the issues of whether homosexuality is normal or natural. Those are the talking points of homophobes.
You are claiming that the relevance of your assertion is found in the fact that others deny the validity of your assertion. That is just circular, non sequitur bullshit.
You are not going to win any debate with this grade school garbage. I don't even feel as if you have entered the debate. I thought you were chicken shit but maybe this is just the best you have to offer.
LOL Your insults prove my point again, loser.
You appear to be backing off on your normal and natural assertions, since after debating these same points for several days you're now attempting to claim that they are not part of the debate.
LOL Your insults prove my point again, loser.
You appear to be backing off on your normal and natural assertions, since after debating these same points for several days you're now attempting to claim that they are not part of the debate.
Actually, no.As has been pointed out numerous times, your arguments have been shot down over and over and over.
....
Yeah, your usual method for exiting. What insult? I have only attacked your arguments. If you are too sensitive to handle that then this might not be the place for you.
Normal and natural are part of the debate because you raised the issues. I am not backing off anything. They are still not valid. They are also not relevant and your reasoning for their relevance is complete nonsense.
Actually, no.
You stated: "I thought you were chicken shit", which is clearly an insult. Since you can't admit that, its no wonder that you can't admit defeat.
Then you claim that I'm being sensitive, which is a deflection of the fact that you lamely insulted me.![]()