He's in Afghanistan.To convict them of what? Pulling them out of Iraq where they are in the position to hurt someone (or actually, it might be afghanistan that he's in), is not convicting anyone .
A link to the snapshot? Nobody, not even the Army is denying what was on the page Damo. After the Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch "investigations" which you I'm sure also gave the "benefit of the doubt to" I don't have any faith whatsoever in these liars. Once someone lies to me, I no longer believe them. Now, I know that's "anti-American" but I'm just funny that way. And there is no way I would want to see anyone in this guy's way until this "investigation" plays out. I wouldn't want to be in an isolated situation with him until the investigation was over, and since I wouldn't I don't feel that it's ok to put Iraqis or Afghanis in that situation. That's another way that I'm peculiar.
I guarantee you, if the dude wrote the story, he got a snapshot of the page. Also whomever brought the page to his attention, they probably took one as well.
Anyway,
I did notice that he used "heathenistic" instead of "hedonistic".
However, taken in context of sarcastic remark the comment could be viewed entirely differently. "Not even the army is denying" is rubbish, the Army has said that it is investigating. So far, they came out with the truth on Tillman, and on Jessica.... So, "giving them the benefit of the doubt" so far has worked out well.
The schadenfruede comes from, "See she's no good, her son did this!"
And yes, I prefer to wait to find out more information before trashing anybody. I always will.