Draft: Articles of Impeachment

Given how hysterical Conservatives responded to Mueller's report, there's no reason to think they won't go totally insane if impeachment based on that report happens.

:lolup:Willful idiot thinks Conservatives are the one's who are responding with hysterics. :laugh:
 
You're keeping hope alive 60 out of 435 house members.... means 375 don't care or think there is a clear case for impeachment, huh?

Not yet.

Once impeachment proceedings start, that number will grow as Conservatives will be forced to defend the criminal activity of the President they support 100%.

Would love to watch you defend Trump's obstruction.

"It's OK for the President to obstruct an investigation because the investigation will make him look bad" - You, probably
 
Conservatives are the minority, yes.

We just had an election that you lost by 10,000,000 votes in total in the House.

Trump lost the popular vote by 3,000,000.

Whether or not a trial happens in the Senate is meaningless...it's a lose-lose for Conservatism because impeachment in the House will drive Trump insane, and McConnell's inaction will make the 2020 election a referendum on Conservative governance in the Senate and White House.

You won't win that election if that's the case. You will lose by the same massive margins you lost by last November.

Better prep your teabag now.

:lolup:Willful idiot thinks Democrats are winning. :laugh:
 
Only a minority of people supported impeaching Nixon at first too...then it grew once the impeachment proceedings started and Nixon and his allies were forced to defend their criminal activity.

The same will be the case here...only it'll be worse for you because Conservatives today are way more emotional, dumb, and hysterical than they were in 1974.

Is that why they are calling on John Dean to testify? Are they stuck in 1974?
 
Not yet.

Once impeachment proceedings start, that number will grow as Conservatives will be forced to defend the criminal activity of the President they support 100%.

Would love to watch you defend Trump's obstruction.

Do you work for the California psychic hotline?
 
Is that why they are calling on John Dean to testify? Are they stuck in 1974?

He got the last criminal Conservative President, so why not bring him in again?

You sound scared.

Your lifeboat's been burned, so this is it for you; it's Trump or nothing.

If Trump's gone, you're gone.

Sure, you'll try to re-brand yourself because you can't go long without needing accommodation. But unlike the last time you re-branded, we know your trick...so stapling a teabag to your face this time isn't going to make us forget you supported the disastrous Republican Conservative POTUS and defended his criminal activity, all because your ego is too fragile to admit he took you for a sucker.
 
You're keeping hope alive

60 out of 435 house members.... means 375 don't care or think there is a clear case for impeachment, huh?

Once impeachment proceedings start, that number will grow as Conservatives will be forced to defend the criminal activity of the President they support 100%.

Doesn't the House of Representatives have to pass a resolution listing the charges or “Articles of Impeachment” against the official being impeached? How do they have the votes?

Here's an inconvenient fact for shrill liberal morons like yourself: no American President has ever been forced from office due to impeachment. Dunce.
 
He got the last criminal Conservative President, so why not bring him in again?

You sound scared.

Your lifeboat's been burned, so this is it for you; it's Trump or nothing.

If Trump's gone, you're gone.

Sure, you'll try to re-brand yourself because you can't go long without needing accommodation. But unlike the last time you re-branded, we know your trick...so stapling a teabag to your face this time isn't going to make us forget you supported the disastrous Republican Conservative POTUS and defended his criminal activity, all because your ego is too fragile to admit he took you for a sucker.

Scary that idiots like this vote. Translation:

giphy.gif
 
Do you work for the California psychic hotline?

"Obstruction of Justice is OK because _______"
-You, in a few months, probably

Like I said, watching Conservatives justify and defend illegal and criminal behavior is exactly what we want heading into 2020; you will paint yourselves as lawless, craven, and completely irresponsible. Defending criminal activity will be all the GOP and Conservatives will be known for. Voters aren't going to like that you defend lawbreaking.

But please...defend criminal activity.

Make the case that obstruction of justice isn't really a crime if it's done to preserve the fragile ego of Donald Trump.

I want you to die on that hill.
 
"Obstruction of Justice is OK because _______"
-You, in a few months, probably

Like I said, watching Conservatives justify and defend illegal and criminal behavior is exactly what we want heading into 2020; you will paint yourselves as lawless, craven, and completely irresponsible. Defending criminal activity will be all the GOP and Conservatives will be known for. Voters aren't going to like that you defend lawbreaking.

But please...defend criminal activity.

Make the case that obstruction of justice isn't really a crime if it's done to preserve the fragile ego of Donald Trump.

I want you to die on that hill.

Here you go LV426.

https://chm.tbe.taleo.net/chm03/ats/careers/apply.jsp?org=OUTLOOKAMUSEMENTS&cws=1

good luck, I am supporting you.
 

Fact is that you defend lawlessness and criminal behavior because that's what you engage in, isn't it?

That's what drew you to Trump in the first place, wasn't it?

Nothing to do with economic anxiety, it's that you instinctively knew you shared the same morality as Trump, so you could live vicariously through his success because you tasted no success of your own, on your own.
 
Back
Top