Dream Team?

christiefan915

Catalyst
If he asks Palin to be his running mate, my dreams will be fulfilled.

Santorum considers presidential campaign
Saturday, January 16, 2010
By Daniel Malloy, Post-Gazette Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum is actively considering a run for president in 2012, according to a letter he sent to supporters.

The Republican, who has a home in Penn Hills but has lived in northern Virginia since he lost his Senate seat in 2006, sent a letter and email this month to supporters of his political action committee, America's Foundation. In the missives, Mr. Santorum accused President Barack Obama of overspending and not paying enough attention to threats against America.

"I hope you'll join me today to lay the groundwork for taking back our country," Mr. Santorum wrote. "I promise you, I will stop at nothing when it comes to defending our freedom and our values. That's the real reason why -- after talking it over with my wife, Karen, and our kids -- I am considering putting my name in for the 2012 presidential race."

Mr. Santorum, 51, has publicly flirted with the idea of a presidential run in recent months, but the letter was his strongest statement on the issue to date. He has visited early primary states Iowa and South Carolina in the past few months.

"I'm convinced that conservatives need a candidate who will not only stand up for our views, but who can articulate a conservative vision for our country's future," he wrote. "And right now, I just don't see anyone stepping up to the plate."

A noted social conservative and foe of homosexuality and abortion, Mr. Santorum could have a strong appeal for Republican religious conservatives in the primary. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin are also seen -- at this early date -- as potential standard bearers for the party's social conservatives.

But those views at times brought Mr. Santorum controversy, and contributed -- along with his strong association with the unpopular president George W. Bush -- to the senator's loss to Democrat Bob Casey in 2006. The 18-point margin of defeat was the worst for a sitting senator since 1980.

Mr. Santorum's message to supporters, which included a request for a donation for his "Launch 2010" strategy to help Republicans take back Congress and later the White House, urged less spending and "traditional values Americans hold dear." He wrote that Mr. Obama, one year into his term, has undermined the nation's fiscal health and national security.

"I have no great burning desire to be president, but I have a burning desire to have a different president of the United States," Mr. Santorum wrote.

"So you can count on me to make certain that whoever is the Republican nominee for president in 2012 is someone who shares our values and will fight for them as president -- and who can ultimately defeat Obama."

Santorum media strategist John Brabender said Mr. Santorum is planning another trip to Iowa in the spring.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10016/1028745-454.stm#ixzz0cnUIEKir
 
If Dan Quayle can be a VP, Palin is certainly qualified.
LOL That's a good point! I always used to joke during Bush I that Marylin Quayle was better qualified to be VP then her hubbie (and she was). All he had going for him was his patrician name. It just makes me chuckle and it's indicitive of how far into trailer trash politics the Republican party has fallen when it comes to women in their party and they have a woman of the abilities and qualifications of Condaleza Rice and the morons in their party would prefer a light weight like Palin. Fairly boggles the mind.
 
I can remember in 98 moderate Republicans (Who were the majority of the party at the time) saying there was no way in hell the Republican party would be foolish enough to nominate a post turtle like George W. Bush. Need I say more?

You are comparing Santorium to W.? Please. I'll bet you a $1,000 he doesn't last more than a few weeks if he trys to run.
 
if Obama is qualified the job is probably below Palin's pay scale.....
Well it just so happens that the majority of Americans disagree with you. LOL So that's an argument that's been put to bed. Now if you can get Palin a JD in Constitutional Law from an Ivy League University, we might start to change our mind about her.
 
You are comparing Santorium to W.? Please. I'll bet you a $1,000 he doesn't last more than a few weeks if he trys to run.
Well let me be clear. I pray to God that you are right. We need a reactionary like Santorum in office like we need a collective hole in our heads. I'm just saying don't underestimate the man or overestimate the American public. As for Palin. If the Republicans want a woman on the ticket why in the name of Sam Hell would they nominate her when then have a woman of Rice's qualifications, education and experience? Palin isn't even remotely qualified. The American public was emphatic about that. Rice is!
 
Well let me be clear. I pray to God that you are right. We need a reactionary like Santorum in office like we need a collective hole in our heads. I'm just saying don't underestimate the man or overestimate the American public. As for Palin. If the Republicans want a woman on the ticket why in the name of Sam Hell would they nominate her when then have a woman of Rice's qualifications, education and experience? Palin isn't even remotely qualified. The American public was emphatic about that. Rice is!

Because Rice is tainted by being in W's administration. Pretty much ruined her national political aspirations if she had any. With all the talk about 'change' in '08 do you really believe Rice would have been a good choice? Because of Palin McCain's loss was a lot less than it likely would have been. However that is irrelevent because losing is losing.
 
Because Rice is tainted by being in W's administration. Pretty much ruined her national political aspirations if she had any. With all the talk about 'change' in '08 do you really believe Rice would have been a good choice? Because of Palin McCain's loss was a lot less than it likely would have been. However that is irrelevent because losing is losing.
I don't think Ike or Lincoln could have gotten elected as President on the Republican ticket after W. 2012 may be a different ball game but you're point is a valid one.
 
LOL That's a good point! I always used to joke during Bush I that Marylin Quayle was better qualified to be VP then her hubbie (and she was). All he had going for him was his patrician name. It just makes me chuckle and it's indicitive of how far into trailer trash politics the Republican party has fallen when it comes to women in their party and they have a woman of the abilities and qualifications of Condaleza Rice and the morons in their party would prefer a light weight like Palin. Fairly boggles the mind.

How about a Colin Powell/Condie Rice ticket?

I doubt they would win, but it would make the debates a blast to watch. Those two would slaughter the competition.
 
It's tempting to wish that extremist candidates would win so that your party can slaughter them, but have these people that close to the presidency would worry me regardless. What if Obama made a huge stumble and they won? It's a possibility.

Mitt Romney would make a fine president even if he did win - once all of our liberal legislation is passed.
 
Well it just so happens that the majority of Americans disagree with you. LOL So that's an argument that's been put to bed. Now if you can get Palin a JD in Constitutional Law from an Ivy League University, we might start to change our mind about her.

omigorsh, that's never happened before....
 
Back
Top