DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[CFM]

He wasn't drunk. Contextomy fallacy.

Were you there? How do you know?

 

[CFM]

Void argument fallacy.

Speaking the truth is never void. Driving while drunk, something you support someone being able to do, shows a void in mental ability.

 

[Scut Farkus]

Why do you think it's OK to be a drunk driver? Hopefully a drunk driver will hit your family members since you believe it's OK for them to drive drunk.

you couldn't piss your way out of a cotton candy prison.

 

[CFM]

you couldn't piss your way out of a cotton candy prison.

Why do you think I have the need to do so drunkard?

 

[Scut Farkus]

Why do you think I have the need to do so drunkard?

im just saying. byeeeeeeeeee.

 

[CFM]

im just saying. byeeeeeeeeee.

Since you can't answer, that's called talking shit you can't defend.

Run like the typical drunkard when his problem is addressed.

 

[Scut Farkus]

Since you can't answer, that's called talking shit you can't defend.

Run like the typical drunkard when his problem is addressed.

poopy

 

[CFM]

poopy

Stop drinking and driving. Innocent lives might be saved.

 

[Scut Farkus]

Stop drinking and driving. Innocent lives might be saved.

stop being ignorant of the constitution. freedom may ensue.

 

[CFM]

stop being ignorant of the constitution. freedom may ensue.

The Constitution does not protect your desire to drive drunk. Why do you think it does?

 

[Scut Farkus]

The Constitution does not protect your desire to drive drunk. Why do you think it does?

it protects from unwarranted searches and seizures, which checkpoints clearly are.

 

[domer76]

it protects from unwarranted searches and seizures, which checkpoints clearly are.

The Constitution says "unreasonable search and seizure", not "unwarranted", moron.

Sitz ruled the stops are reasonable.

CONSTITUTIONAL!

 

[CFM]

it protects from unwarranted searches and seizures, which checkpoints clearly are.

You only consider checkpoints unwarranted because you want to drive drunk. Why would rather see an INNOCENT person harmed/killed because of your selfish desire to do drink and drive?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You only consider checkpoints unwarranted because you want to drive drunk. Why would rather see an INNOCENT person harmed/killed because of your selfish desire to do drink and drive?

only an absolutist moron considers the extremes between rights and tyranny, all in the manner to feel safe

 

[Scut Farkus]

You only consider checkpoints unwarranted because you want to drive drunk. Why would rather see an INNOCENT person harmed/killed because of your selfish desire to do drink and drive?

stop your totalitarian propaganda, ya idjit.

 

[CFM]

only an absolutist moron considers the extremes between rights and tyranny, all in the manner to feel safe

Only a sloppy drunk that can't control his selfish desires believes it's OK to drive drunk. Get off the bottle, boy.

 

[CFM]

stop your totalitarian propaganda, ya idjit.

Why can't you answer the question? Too fucking drunk, selfish, and/or stupid?

 

[gfm7175]

You only consider checkpoints unwarranted because you want to drive drunk. Why would rather see an INNOCENT person harmed/killed because of your selfish desire to do drink and drive?

Did Domer hack your account?

 

[gfm7175]

Only a sloppy drunk that can't control his selfish desires believes it's OK to drive drunk. Get off the bottle, boy.

Nobody said it WAS okay, boy. It's called reading comprehension, boy.

 

[gfm7175]

Why can't you answer the question? Too fucking drunk, selfish, and/or stupid?

Already answered countless times, boy.