E Jean Wins Again

[ptif219]

They even had to get the statute of limitations changed to allow the case in the first place.

Plus they had to go to Federal court to allow hearsay to be used

 

[ptif219]

That he raped her d'uh.

TRUMP IS A RAPIST and anyone can call him that legally for and he cannot sue them successfully defemantion as TRUTH and FACT is an absolute defense to defamation and his case would be instantly dismissed and he would face sanctions.


God you are a terrible person.

The history of 'date rape' type allegation, where it is he said/she said, has NEVER been a place where many of those raped want to go.

Women raped by men, who take them 'shopping' and 'grab them by the pussy' because they 'can't help themselves', etc, or Young boys raped by Coaches or priests.

Shame, a hostile legal system that puts the victim on trial, and power disparities often make it such that a person, in the moment does not want to bring a charge and does not have the emotional stability to do so.

For any women seeking to advance a career, especially back then, a rape accusation, even a successfully proven one, could greatly harm the entire rest of her career.

He was not charged with Rape and that was not proven. There was no proof it was mostly he said she said no evidence. Waiting 20 years shows how political it was

 

[ptif219]

All he did is quote things Trump said. Grow up and get real with life -- such as yours is.

Wheren is the trial? Typical Democrat that took what was said out of context

 

[QP!]

He was not charged with Rape and that was not proven. There was no proof it was mostly he said she said no evidence. Waiting 20 years shows how political it was

And yet a civil jury did find he sexual assualted/raped her. That was body #1.

Then when Trump tried to sue E Jean for liable when she stated he 'raped her' a Judge looked at the case and made a judicial finding, that in FACT he did rape her and thus he could not sue her for defamation. So that is body 2.


Trump needs to quit while he is behind as he may get a 3rd and 4th body to all also label him a rapist before this is done.


I think we all should celebrate that anyone anywhere can PROPERLY label Trump a rapist now and citre the Judicial filing, if Trump tried to sue, to get it dismissed because 'Truth and fact are an absolute defense to libel'.

 

[serendipity]

How many imaginary dicks have you sucked off of 80-something strangers on the internet today, Toxic? Did you get your fill for the day? Does our fat cow need another load down her "teacher's" throat or will you go watch football silently like a good girl?

You're a truly loathsome human being, truly beyond the pale.

 

[ptif219]

And yet a civil jury did find he sexual assualted/raped her. That was body #1.

Then when Trump tried to sue E Jean for liable when she stated he 'raped her' a Judge looked at the case and made a judicial finding, that in FACT he did rape her and thus he could not sue her for defamation. So that is body 2.


Trump needs to quit while he is behind as he may get a 3rd and 4th body to all also label him a rapist before this is done.


I think we all should celebrate that anyone anywhere can PROPERLY label Trump a rapist now and citre the Judicial filing, if Trump tried to sue, to get it dismissed because 'Truth and fact are an absolute defense to libel'.

They had no evidence it even happened besides hearsay

 

[serendipity]

And yet a civil jury did find he sexual assualted/raped her. That was body #1.

Then when Trump tried to sue E Jean for liable when she stated he 'raped her' a Judge looked at the case and made a judicial finding, that in FACT he did rape her and thus he could not sue her for defamation. So that is body 2.


Trump needs to quit while he is behind as he may get a 3rd and 4th body to all also label him a rapist before this is done.


I think we all should celebrate that anyone anywhere can PROPERLY label Trump a rapist now and citre the Judicial filing, if Trump tried to sue, to get it dismissed because 'Truth and fact are an absolute defense to libel'.

It's spelt libel not liable, dumb fuck!!

 

[QP!]

They had no evidence it even happened besides hearsay

Which is the case with the vast, vast majority of date rape situations where it is not penile rape done.

Which is the case with the vast, vast majority of Priest, Coach (etc) rape of minors when it is not penile rape done.

Especially if the person is traumatized, or feels the power imbalance and society will revictimize them, if they report it.

 

[Diesel]

Wheren is the trial? Typical Democrat that took what was said out of context

Where the rape happened. That's how it works. I'm not a Democrat.

 

[Diesel]

You're a truly loathsome human being, truly beyond the pale.

Not really, but I say some wild shit to the forum MAGA morons. They are deplorable human beings and deserve to be talked to like that.

 

[serendipity]

Which is the case with the vast, vast majority of date rape situations where it is not penile rape done.

Which is the case with the vast, vast majority of Priest, Coach (etc) rape of minors when it is not penile rape done.

Especially if the person is traumatized, or feels the power imbalance and society will revictimize them, if they report it.

Rape in English law

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1[1] of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_English_law

 

[ptif219]

Where the rape happened. That's how it works. I'm not a Democrat.

You just hate Trump like a Democrat does?

 

[ptif219]

Not really, but I say some wild shit to the forum MAGA morons. They are deplorable human beings and deserve to be talked to like that.

You show you are a Democrat. You love hate just like the Democrats

 

[QP!]

Rape in English law

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1[1] of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.
(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_in_English_law

Yes but Trump lives in the US where that outdated law has been updated.

...“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” ...

 

[serendipity]

Yes but Trump lives in the US where that outdated law has been updated.

2003 is outdated ffs, are you serious?

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1[1] of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

 

[serendipity]

Yes but Trump lives in the US where that outdated law has been updated.

As I already stated, activists pushed to get the definition changed so that it was much easier to charge somebody with rape rather than sexual assault.

Wasn't Biden accused of much the same thing, why didn't he get charged with your definition of rape aka fingering?

 

[QP!]

2003 is outdated ffs, are you serious?

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1[1] of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

And Trump lives in the US where like most of the rest of the first world they have updated rape to be more reflective of what it is.

As I already stated, activists pushed to get the definition changed so that it was much easier to charge somebody with rape rather than sexual assault.

Wasn't Biden accused of much the same thing, why didn't he get charged with your definition of rape aka fingering?

I don't care what you said when you are wrong.

The original definition of 'rape' came out of an age when it was thought only women could be raped, and that the ultimate crime you could do to a woman was have sex with her (forced) when not married to her, and ruin her for any other man. Even a married woman would be shamed if raped by a stranger.

Those ideas have been outgrown. Now we accept a man sent to jail, and 'prison raped' by a group of men, do not need to use their penis. He can be raped with broom handles, being fisted or in other ways.
This idea that the penis is so uniquely offensive to be raped with that it needs its own category and everything else a lessor sub category is out dated and wrong.

It is not due to activism, and is due to common sense.

 

[serendipity]

And Trump lives in the US where like most of the rest of the first world they have updated rape to be more reflective of what it is.




I don't care what you said when you are wrong.

The original definition of 'rape' came out of an age when it was thought only women could be raped, and that the ultimate crime you could do to a woman was have sex with her (forced) when not married to her, and ruin her for any other man. Even a married woman would be shamed if raped by a stranger.

Those ideas have been outgrown. Now we accept a man sent to jail, and 'prison raped' by a group of men, do not need to use their penis. He can be raped with broom handles, being fisted or in other ways.
This idea that the penis is so uniquely offensive to be raped with that it needs its own category and everything else a lessor sub category is out dated and wrong.

It is not due to activism, and is due to common sense.

I don't care about what you say either, rape is defined precisely in English common law. If you don't like it then fuck you preferably with a broomstick.

 

[QP!]

I don't care about what you say either, rape is defined precisely in English common law. If you don't like it then fuck you preferably with a broomstick.

And why would Americans care what you say?

The US clearly defines rape, and Trump fits in that definition as a RAPIST.

You have your view of the US only changing the law due to "Activists" but again WTF do you think we should care what YOU think the reason is? you think way too much of your derp opinion. We care about US law and what it says.

 

[serendipity]

And why would Americans care what you say?

The US clearly defines rape, and Trump fits in that definition as a RAPIST.

You have your view of the US only changing the law due to "Activists" but again WTF do you think we should care what YOU think the reason is? you think way too much of your derp opinion. We care about US law and what it says.

I will say this, anybody who uses derp in a sentence is truly fucking creepy.