Education in the news

Diogenes

You have insufficient privileges to post facts
Gfa7hP4XkAAmkhB



Between 2019 and 2023, US math scores cratered, dropping by 18 points for fourth graders and a whopping 27 points for eighth graders—huge declines on a scale where 30 points roughly equates to a year of learning.

In science, declines weren't statistically significant but were in the same direction.


 

U.S. Students Posted Dire Math Declines on an International Test​

On the test, American fourth and eighth graders posted results similar to scores from 1995. It was a sign of notable stagnation, even as other countries saw improvements.



 



The United States spends significantly on K-12 education when compared internationally.

In terms of expenditure per student, the U.S. allocates about $15,000 per student annually for elementary and secondary education, which places it above the median spending of OECD countries by 30%.

This figure ranks the U.S. among the top spenders, specifically fifth highest after Luxembourg, Norway, Austria, and South Korea.

However, despite this high level of spending, the U.S. does not lead in educational outcomes, often ranking below many other developed nations in international assessments like PISA (Program for International Student Assessment).

There's also an ongoing debate about the efficiency of spending, as the U.S. has seen a consistent increase in inflation-adjusted education spending since the 1970s, yet outcomes have not scaled proportionally.

Critics argue that the focus should not just be on increasing spending but on how funds are utilized, including teacher quality, class sizes, and educational policy reforms.

In summary, while the U.S. ranks high in per-student expenditure for K-12 education, the effectiveness of this spending is often questioned when compared to educational outcomes and the spending strategies of other countries
 

NEA embraces the woke agenda — but votes down “student learning”​



 

BECAUSE YOU SUCK AT YOUR JOB?
If you pay for the best, you get the best. If you pay bottom dollar, then you get whoever is willing to teach for bottom dollar. We have a teacher shortage, because we are stuck with whoever will work for bottom dollar.

Many of the teachers we have are great teachers, willing to sacrifice and make less just to teach, but apparently not enough.
 
Many of the teachers we have are great teachers, willing to sacrifice and make less just to teach, but apparently not enough.
Many of the teachers nonetheless push the Climate Change religion in the science classroom and teach children that LGBTQIAMVPPIPROLSTNCZUWXMLY+ are superior to mere ordinary people. Many of the teachers nonetheless push political agendas that go against their family values as established by the parents. Many of the teachers just suck as human beings and are in it only for the power rush of intimidating students. Many teachers just suck at teaching, and simply aren't stellar at explaining arithmetic, English grammar, science, or really anything else.

There's a reason that, despite the importance parents place on education, they don't want to pay teachers any more than bottom dollar, i.e. teachers are perceived as not really teaching their children, but are more or less only babysitting them. This the motivation for so many parents looking into home schooling.
 
Is that so?
Nope. If you increase the pay of people who suck, you get grossly overpaid people who suck.

Walt is neglecting to consider the detrimental impact of unions on a society and on an economy. His statement that "If you pay for the best, you get the best" doesn't apply where unions are involved. With unions, you can't easily get rid of the sucky shits who have "seniority" and who perform at minimum acceptable contract levels just to hire great people and pay them more.

Oh, and teachers cling to their union like Alabama ticks.
 
Back
Top