You think it is relevant. Don't know why. Clinton did not make 50 percent. That had meaning to you. Daffy Donald did not get it, so you slough it off. In both cases, they held the presidency. A difference is that Clinton did a good job.And?
You think it is relevant. Don't know why. Clinton did not make 50 percent. That had meaning to you. Daffy Donald did not get it, so you slough it off. In both cases, they held the presidency. A difference is that Clinton did a good job.And?
I do? Nothing I have stated says it is relevant other than the fact that Perot affected that election significantly. Everything else you read into it is all you, my friend.You think it is relevant. Don't know why. Clinton did not make 50 percent. That had meaning to you. Daffy Donald did not get it, so you slough it off. In both cases, they held the presidency. A difference is that Clinton did a good job.
You got the order wrong. trump used egg prices being high as an example of something he would correct on day one. We are several months in, and only a drop in demand temporarily dropped the price of eggs. It turns out that trump's not thinking does not solve problems.Basically, the left used "eggs" as an example as their rising cost was outside of inflation due to a bird flu epidemic.
It is you who are wrong. Egg prices have been steadily falling.You got the order wrong. trump used egg prices being high as an example of something he would correct on day one. We are several months in, and only a drop in demand temporarily dropped the price of eggs. It turns out that trump's not thinking does not solve problems.