Elon Musk says he'll reveal 'what really happened' with Twitter suppression of Hunter

Whereas you are probably correct about the reason for the severe decline in his mental acuity, if you peruse his recent posts you'll understand that I was offering his own debate guidelines as proof that he has lost this debate.

He's confusing two near homonyms, but he believes it's simply a matter of spelling.

It's a deterioration of his cognitive abilities. IDK why.
 
If the DNC or Biden campaign asked Twitter to censure stories or people that is In Kind Contribution. If the DNC or Biden didn't pay for it it's a campaign finance violation.

ROFLMAO. Not posting something is a campaign contribution? Try to convince a court of that one. Heck, try to find a competent lawyer willing to argue that to the court.
 
Whereas you are probably correct about the reason for the severe decline in his mental acuity, if you peruse his recent posts you'll understand that I was offering his own debate guidelines as proof that he has lost this debate.

He's confusing two NEAR homonyms, but he believes it's simply a matter of spelling.

Censure and Censor ARE HOMOPHONES which ARE HOMONYMS not NEAR HOMONYMS. Gees if you are going to TRY to be a grammar teacher at least TRY to be a good grammar teacher .

:facepalm:
 
First rule of internet debate.

When the person that you are debating starts correcting your spelling you are winning the debate. :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

Actually the first rule is when the person you are debating doesn't know the meaning of words they are using they aren't even debating. They are just flailing.
 
Censure and Censor ARE HOMOPHONES which ARE HOMONYMS not NEAR HOMONYMS. Gees if you are going to TRY to be a grammar teacher at least TRY to be a good grammar teacher .

:facepalm:

Censure and censor are not pronounced the same.

cen·sure
/ˈsen(t)SHər/

cen·sor
/ˈsensər/

Are sure and sir pronounced the same where you live?
 
ROFLMAO. Not posting something is a campaign contribution? Try to convince a court of that one. Heck, try to find a competent lawyer willing to argue that to the court.
Twitter did what they did to HELP the Biden campaign that is an in kind campaign contribution.


An in-kind contribution is a non-monetary contribution. Goods or services offered free or at less than the usual charge result in an in-kind contribution. Similarly, when a person or entity pays for services on the committee's behalf, the payment is an in-kind contribution.
https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates...nd contribution is,is an in-kind contribution.

Example:

DNC: "Hey Twitter we want you to ban James Wood's Twitter account."
Twitter: "Handled"

Twitter performed a service at the DNC behest.
 
Last edited:
Censure and censor are not pronounced the same.

cen·sure
/ˈsen(t)SHər/

cen·sor
/ˈsensər/

Are sure and sir pronounced the same where you live?
The are still homophones moron.

The words censure, censor and sensor are homophones and all three of them have similar pronunciation which is s-en-sur. The words have very different and distinguished meanings however as they do not relate to each other.

https://www.grammar.com/censure_vs.... censure, censor and,not relate to each other.
 
What is the monetary value of not posting something?
Invaluable prevention of negative press. It probably gave Biden the Presidency.

Nearly four of five Americans who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that “truthful” coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, according to a new poll.

A similar percentage also said they’re convinced that information on the computer is real, with just 11% saying they thought it was “created by Russia,” according to the survey conducted by the New Jersey-based Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics.

And an even higher number — 81% — said US Attorney General Merrick Garland should appoint a special counsel to investigate matters related to the first son’s infamous laptop, the existence of which was exclusively revealed by The Post in October 2020.
https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/2020-...iffer-with-hunter-biden-laptop-coverage-poll/
 
Oh look, a dietician that also doesn't know how to pronounce censure.
It's possible to find anything on the internet. I'll bet I can find where ExpressLane has been called an idiot. Since it's on the internet, it must be true.
If sir and sure are not homophones then censor and censure are not homophones.
 
I’m getting the impression that these guys are really disappointed they couldn’t see more of Hunter’s “supposed” dick.
Maybe YOU want to know how many M&Ms Hunter can balance on his dick but I'm more interested in the evidence of Joe Biden's corruption that is on the laptop. That is probably why the Biden campaign colluded with Twitter to suppress the story.
 
Oh look, a dietician that also doesn't know how to pronounce censure.
It's possible to find anything on the internet. I'll bet I can find where ExpressLane has been called an idiot. Since it's on the internet, it must be true.
If sir and sure are not homophones then censor and censure are not homophones.

My source was grammar.com take your stupid argument to them . I'm done with this.
 
Maybe YOU want to know how many M&Ms Hunter can balance on his dick but I'm more interested in the evidence of Joe Biden's corruption that is on the laptop. That is probably why the Biden campaign colluded with Twitter to suppress the story.
Projection
 
Lol, no it wouldn’t women and youth determined the election outcome and they don’t care about Hunter Biden’s laptop. Americans do want Hunter investigated, but Murdoch’s Post is wrong about the election outcome.
Just 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin cost Trump the election.


Media Research Center, a conservative watchdog organization, tested that theory recently in a poll of 1,750 voters in seven swing states.

What they learned in an admittedly small survey was that one of every six Biden voters (17%) said they would not have voted for him had they known the facts about several of the news stories the national media refused to investigate thoroughly because they might have hurt his candidacy.

Had one of six voters not voted for Biden in the swing states, or voted for Trump instead, the election would have turned out differently.

The survey showed that 45.1% of Biden voters were unaware of the financial scandals of Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and how Hunter's business had been wrapped up in Biden's work in foreign affairs while vice president under President Barack Obama.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2020/nov/26/cooper-biden-voters/
 
Back
Top