blackascoal
The Force is With Me
There is no need for that, I shall kill myself and, like Christ, take on the sins of all.
You are right.
I apologize.
There is no need for that, I shall kill myself and, like Christ, take on the sins of all.
um dude its the right who is wittleing away at their own ability to win elections here with all this racism.
Pointing out traitors to our side is healthy
Once you are fanatically attempting to find and punish traitors to "our side", you know you are deep in the pits of mania.
It's all good Onceler, they'll try to silence you, ironically by saying you are somehow trying to silence them. The thing of it is, the "agree damn you!" mentality doesn't help the conversation at all. If we are ever to get to a point where Dr. King has a shot of seeing his dream we have to be able to actually talk about it.
Would you like me to "link" the 1,300 posts, psycho?
got nothing huh?
remember how I told you people who have a great piece of evidence jump at the chance to reproduce it on call.
you are outed
Once you are fanatically attempting to find and punish traitors to "our side", you know you are deep in the pits of mania.
Yes, and not dismiss it or tell a black man that his response is over the top or words to that effect.
Your post was so helpful in bringing about a discussion, lol
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...An-Awakening-to-Racist-Evil-in-America/page14
Read this thread... it is all here.
displaying for all to see someones true nature is freedom for that persons true nature.
No punishment here
Some people (Lorax, myself) think the evidence in the case and the ineptness of the prosecution led to the acquittal of Zimmerman. Others (BAC, Desh) proclaim that we are racists for thinking that.
Have I said that? I'd appreciate you showing where that happened. Being able to say, "I think you are wrong in this case, and that the comparison case you use has these differences, and this is why." must be part of the conversation if we are ever to hold a conversation on the issue.
If one side isn't allowed to speak at all per the rules of "agree or we'll call you racist regardless of past and current agreements" it becomes a net loss. A conversation can't even be contemplated because if one doesn't agree with you the are monstrous hideous beasts who believe something they've never shown a proclivity to believe.
No it isn't, don't listen to his take, it is incorrect, sheesh, he doesn't even realize, STILL, why BAC is upset, could he please buy a clue.
Rune
Rune is offline Mjölner
Join Date:Jan 2011Location:VinlandPosts:15,030Thanks:10,341Thanked 3,607 Times in 2,802 Posts Groans:2,310 Groaned 3,056 Times in 2,711 Posts Blog Entries:4
Default
Quote Originally Posted by Thing1 View Post
I'm not trying to "silence" anyone. Comparing this to Emmett Till is patently absurb. Does intent mean nothing to you?
Are you on fucking drugs?
I really want to know, because whatever you have is a hell of a lot better than what I am smoking.
do you really think this is completely unlike the till case?
really?
The Till case was worse because Till was younger, it was totally premeditated, and there were basically no overly broad laws that can be said to have forced the juries hand, the jury just totally ignored the law because it was a black kid.
um dude its the right who is wittleing away at their own ability to win elections here with all this racism.
Pointing out traitors to our side is healthy
yet when I ask you to explain it, you refuse.
You all seem to see some 'code' in what was written.