Employment still below levels when GWB was president

And again you don't address the post at all....you ramble about not supporting the Iraq war....which couldn't have taked place without yes votes from Democrats like Kerry and Hillary, etc....and then you parrot the predictable playgournd name calling.....how droll....
You should write it all once and save it to cut and paste just to save you time.....

5.2 % avg. Unemploy. rate over an entire two terms, in spite of a Demo. congressional takeover, 2 wars, and the biggest terrorist attack we've ever
had to endure.........thats leadership at its finest.........now don't you have homework to do or something....maybe ICarly is on TV...
 
Last edited:
You never presented any facts in the first place, merely someone's OPINION, so no facts were required to counter your "point".

I don't expect someone stupid enough to post an Op-Ed piece as fact to understand, but with every new day comes renewed hope that Yurt might buy himself a clue...LOL!

Zit Sister, you are stupid and dishonest. Have you even read the opinion piece that you are whining about? This is highlighted after the very first paragraph:

The Business and Media Institute reports:

Unemployment shot up in 2009 from 7.7 percent in January to 10.1 percent in October before settling at 10 percent in December. Behind those percentages were more than 4.1 million people who lost their jobs during the year. According to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, that’s the most job losses in a year since 1940.
 
why not address the OP?

are you scared of facts?

I just gave you sources of more facts than you tiny little brain can handle. You live in a partisan vacuum. In your little pea, the day Obama was sworn in, the carnage that preceded him was his fault.

You can change your avatar, and your screen name, but you're still an asshole.
 
i am doing the right thing, voting for gary johnson.
That would have been OK in some primary but this is the general, and there are only two candidates with a chance to carry the required electoral votes; Johnson is not one of them. He will receive zero. :nono:
 
I just gave you sources of more facts than you tiny little brain can handle. You live in a partisan vacuum. In your little pea, the day Obama was sworn in, the carnage that preceded him was his fault.

You can change your avatar, and your screen name, but you're still an asshole.

and you're still a bullshit artist, with the same boring screen name and avatar.

you can't address the OP because you're a partisan hack.

take your ball and go home.
 
i didn't mean he is literally evil...rather...i don't like obama or romney.
I was just yanking your chain on that one. Romney was far down on my list, which was based solely on conservative credentials, but I always thought of him as a good candidate. After his selection of Ryan I gave him a closer look. He's been saying all the right things since then.

He's smart enough to say something like he did in the second debate, that he would look at all the programs and put them to a test: is it that important that we should borrow money that our children and grandchildren will have to pay for? If it were me, I'd be more blunt and bring up my old argument of enumerated powers, and liberals have a ready ridicule for that. He's left himself a lot of wiggle room, but to me he is saying basically the same thing, just with a much smarter argument since it hits his opposition with their own favorite weapon: emotion. He's destroyed their argument before they made it.

I also like how he subtlety uses The Obama's words against him. I'm not sure if many have noticed that, but he's obviously studied up on his opponent and knows how to get his digs in without seeming petty. He's winning over independents and not giving Democrats any reason to hate him when he becomes President.

He's obviously very smart and a good leader. His reputation is squeaky clean, almost impossibly so, but the Mormons that I know are like that. They are impeccable people and to be greatly admired.
 
Back
Top