Epstein bar syndrome (you have to be drunk in one to believe what Democrats are saying)

[QP!]

Did you?

I did.

A smarter person would see that. Thus why you do not.

 

[Diogenes]

I did. A smarter person would see that. Thus why you do not.

Says you.

 

[Ross Dolan]

So you say. You cannot state with any certainty what might have happened in an alternate reality.

You are correct. I was stating an opinion, but I do not add the words, "In my opinion..." every time.

BUT...you are correct.

 

[Ross Dolan]

The USSC is set to rule on Louisiana v. Callais (consolidated with Robinson v. Callais) soon; hopefully they will wrap things up before the midterms.

In base 10...14 + 10 = 24. That is not so in base 8.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So you say.

So you showed.

 

[Diogenes]

So you showed.

So you say.

Prove it.

I'll wait.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

So you say.

Prove it.

I'll wait.

So you'll wait in denial.

 

[Diogenes]

So you'll wait in denial.

Still waiting.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Still waiting.

Are you sure you aren't just playing in the current?

 

[Diogenes]

Are you sure you aren't just playing in the current?

Still waiting.

 

[Diogenes]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1979692825551028475

View: https://x.com/NapoleonBonabot/status/1979692825551028475

 

[archives]

Sworn testimony before a Congressional subcommittee is generally considered credible evidence, as it is given under oath with legal consequences for perjury. Isn't it, Anchovies?

You really can e that naive

Let’s see, Kavanaugh said he said he believed in precedential law: RFK said he believed in vaccines; Roger Clemons swore he never used steroids; Casper Weinberger said no arms were ever sold to Iran; Michael Cohen swore Trump had nothing to do with business in Russia; Carter Page lied about campaign connections with Russia; should I go on, the list could be endless

 

[Diogenes]

You really can e that naive Let’s see, Kavanaugh said he said he believed in precedential law: RFK said he believed in vaccines; Roger Clemons swore he never used steroids; Casper Weinberger said no arms were ever sold to Iran; Michael Cohen swore Trump had nothing to do with business in Russia; Carter Page lied about campaign connections with Russia; should I go on, the list could be endless

If you have evidence that Acosta perjured himself, contact the appropriate authorities, Anchovies.

Of course, I'll understand completely if you don't.

 

[archives]

If you have evidence that Acosta perjured himself, contact the appropriate authorities, Anchovies.

Of course, I'll understand completely if you don't.

How would anyone know, all we have is what Comer/Jordan released, and I said, neither is known for their honesty

 

[Diogenes]

How would anyone know, all we have is what Comer/Jordan released, and I said, neither is known for their honesty

I guess you're shit out of luck, then.

Poor Anchovies.

 

[archives]

I guess you're shit out of luck, then.

Poor Anchovies.

Why, because I question everything coming out of Comer/Jordan, who outside of the MAGA algorithm does

 

[Diogenes]

Why, because I question everything coming out of Comer/Jordan

No, Anchovies, because you're powerless to prove that Acosta perjured himself, by your own admission.

 

[archives]

No, Anchovies, because you're powerless to prove that Acosta perjured himself, by your own admission.

And you can not prove he didn’t, as logic dictates, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it sure as hell isn’t an elephant

 

[Diogenes]

And you can not prove he didn’t, as logic dictates, if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, and walks like a duck, it sure as hell isn’t an elephant

I don't need to prove he's innocent, Anchovies.

The Fifth Amendment ensures due process, protecting individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without fair legal procedures.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees rights to a fair trial, including an impartial jury and the right to counsel, which support the concept of innocence until proven guilty.

The Fourteenth Amendment extends due process protections to state actions, reinforcing fairness in legal proceedings.

The principle is also rooted in common law and was affirmed in cases like Coffin v. United States (1895), where the Supreme Court recognized the presumption of innocence as a bedrock of criminal law, requiring the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[archives]

I don't need to prove he's innocent, Anchovies.

The Fifth Amendment ensures due process, protecting individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without fair legal procedures.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees rights to a fair trial, including an impartial jury and the right to counsel, which support the concept of innocence until proven guilty.

The Fourteenth Amendment extends due process protections to state actions, reinforcing fairness in legal proceedings.

The principle is also rooted in common law and was affirmed in cases like Coffin v. United States (1895), where the Supreme Court recognized the presumption of innocence as a bedrock of criminal law, requiring the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

None of which anything to do with Acosta saying Trump had nothing to do Epstein