Eric Swalwell makes a complete idiot of himself in hearing

T. A. Gardner said:
Watch the video embedded in it. Swalwell asks Mr. Lyons several questions. They're almost laughable they're so leading and bad. It's like he has a staff of retards working for him since he's reading them off a laptop screen.
Click to expand...
And this stallwell idiot is running for governor of that failed state of kalifornicator. Camela may also run for governor of that failed state, and it currently has the most useless, destructive loser as it's current gov in newscum.
 
anonymoose said:
There’s really nothing wrong with admitting you’re gay.
I don’t know why you deny it.
It’s an open secret on JPP.
Click to expand...
I didn't see where he denied that he is a full blown gay blade. This would be a good time for him to come to the forum to reveal his gay pride status. Woops, just saw where he lied about his sexual preference.
 
anonymoose said:
Yet you openly admit you have sex with corpses.
But not being gay.

Diseasel claims he’s not gay too. What is it with you people?
Click to expand...
Don't bring up other posters, bitch - your issues with anyone else isn't my problem. Not surprised you're trying to be a dick to others, tho.

Bitch.
 
Ross Dolan said:
Swallwell's question sounds to me like a perfectly legitimate, reasonable question...and one that MANY people in our country are asking.

The answer Mr. Lyons gave sounds to me like the kind of bullshit only a MAGA moron would acceopt.
Click to expand...
Of course it does to an idiot like you that couldn't debate your way out of wet paper sack against a 6-year-old. Swalwell's whole diatribe went nowhere. He was completely ineffective.

His opening anecdote, which I transcribed, accurately, word-for-word, is dubious in itself. He met with a grocery cashier? Met with her? Since when do House Representatives meet one-on-one with some working stiff? Then he says she used "van." How many vans have you seen ICE using in their operations? I haven't seen any. They use large SUV, large passenger cars, and sometimes pickup trucks.

Then, finished with that meaningless drivel, he asks Mr. Lyons a question he should have already had the answer to. Anyone that's watched video or seen pictures of ICE operations would know their uniforms have a placard front and back identifying them. Jackets are marked front and back. They have badges on. So, Swalwell wasted his time asking a question with a known and solid conclusion.

What was the purpose of that? To make other Leftists feel good about Swalwell? To pontificate in front of the cameras? Maybe Swalwell is so stupid he thought Mr. Lyons would be equally or more so and give some off the wall answer. Well, that fell through totally. Swalwell should fire whatever aids wrote up that whole line of questioning he used.
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
Of course it does to an idiot like you that couldn't debate your way out of wet paper sack against a 6-year-old. Swalwell's whole diatribe went nowhere. He was completely ineffective.

His opening anecdote, which I transcribed, accurately, word-for-word, is dubious in itself. He met with a grocery cashier? Met with her? Since when do House Representatives meet one-on-one with some working stiff? Then he says she used "van." How many vans have you seen ICE using in their operations? I haven't seen any. They use large SUV, large passenger cars, and sometimes pickup trucks.

Then, finished with that meaningless drivel, he asks Mr. Lyons a question he should have already had the answer to. Anyone that's watched video or seen pictures of ICE operations would know their uniforms have a placard front and back identifying them. Jackets are marked front and back. They have badges on. So, Swalwell wasted his time asking a question with a known and solid conclusion.

What was the purpose of that? To make other Leftists feel good about Swalwell? To pontificate in front of the cameras? Maybe Swalwell is so stupid he thought Mr. Lyons would be equally or more so and give some off the wall answer. Well, that fell through totally. Swalwell should fire whatever aids wrote up that whole line of questioning he used.
Click to expand...
I just think it's hilarious that you're obsessing over Swalwell, when the people you worship, trump, Kegsbreath, Bondi, Nut-Lick, Bessert, etc. who mumble and lie like morons.

Choke on Putin's cock, Bitch.

Tell us more about how the 2020 election was "stolen" and how Haitians "eat pets" you piece of hammered shit. Here, got something for you to jerk off to, demon:

1770918111322.png
 
Swallowell has three wonderful attributes,



He was screwing a Chinese spy named Fang Fang.
He farted on national TV.
He embarrasses himself every time there is a camera around.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Of course it does to an idiot like you that couldn't debate your way out of wet paper sack against a 6-year-old. Swalwell's whole diatribe went nowhere. He was completely ineffective.

His opening anecdote, which I transcribed, accurately, word-for-word, is dubious in itself. He met with a grocery cashier? Met with her? Since when do House Representatives meet one-on-one with some working stiff? Then he says she used "van." How many vans have you seen ICE using in their operations? I haven't seen any. They use large SUV, large passenger cars, and sometimes pickup trucks.

Then, finished with that meaningless drivel, he asks Mr. Lyons a question he should have already had the answer to. Anyone that's watched video or seen pictures of ICE operations would know their uniforms have a placard front and back identifying them. Jackets are marked front and back. They have badges on. So, Swalwell wasted his time asking a question with a known and solid conclusion.

What was the purpose of that? To make other Leftists feel good about Swalwell? To pontificate in front of the cameras? Maybe Swalwell is so stupid he thought Mr. Lyons would be equally or more so and give some off the wall answer. Well, that fell through totally. Swalwell should fire whatever aids wrote up that whole line of questioning he used.
Click to expand...
I am sure Swalwell realized that there were MAGA morons like you to poke fun at his question. I think it is an appropriate, reasonable question to ask...and I assure you I can debate my way out of a wet paper sack (bag)...against a 6 year old. This administration should be nauseating any reasonable, intelligent citizen of America...and any other country, except perhaps Russia and China.

You are part of the most treasonous element of American society ever. I hope that makes you satisfied. I can only imagine that your revel in being part of the element intent on destroying our Republic in the interests of Trump...a totally unworthy individual.

If you win this war, I hope that when the realization of what you have done does not happen while you are repairing a roof...or doing an electrical repair on a 220X...line.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's start with his opening question.

Swalwell starts off with this unverified, and in my opinion, dubious anecdote. I call it dubious because you don't see US Representatives chatting it up with grocery cashiers every day.

Swalwell: A couple of nights ago, I met with a woman who works as a cashier at a grocery store, and I told her I was coming to see you, Mr. Lyons. And she said, "Will you ask him"--and she didn't want to give her name. She was terrified to give her name--But she said, "When I get off my shift at midnight and walk through the parking lot to my car," She said, "If somebody rolls up in an unidentified van and gets out wearing all black, and their faces (are) covered (and) they don't have any identification, and ask me to get in the van, how do I know who they are?"

How does she know Mr. Lyons?

How does she know if they're an ICE agent or bad guys?

Mr. Lyons: Sir, ICE agents have identifiable placards on their uniforms as well as their badges representative. But you won't see ICE agents rolling though parking lots and just snatching someone up. ICE does intelligence driven, targeted, enforcement operations.

Swalwell's anecdote smells like week old fish. Maybe she was a cheap date, given Swalwell's history of those things?

That aside, Mr. Lyons' answer demolishes his leading question. And it is a leading question as Swalwell gives the answer he's looking for in his diatribe.

When that falls flat on its face, Swalwell shifts to a new line of attack having failed miserably with his first. He gives no follow up question.
Click to expand...
Here you go, TA. You can hide from all those "performative Democrats" :)
1770920677403.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top