Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
On the philosophy front, Thomas Dewey reigns supreme...
In Educational psychology, Piaget and Vygotsky are the big two, with guys like Gardner and Maslow ranked pretty high, as well.
Good teachers know how to meet the needs of those academically at the ends, though when extreme, if parents can afford I'd suggest gifted schools or public schools for very low, (IQ in 80's and below).
For kids with IQ's up to high 140's, more in depth study is called for. The problem with not-so-good teachers is that they give 'more work', not different work. Worst of all, make that kid their mini-me and have him/her helping the slow students.
what about those above 155, like me - i tried to hide my intelligence because i learned that people like me were not welcome
That is in the range where differentiated lessons and alternative assessment are no longer effective. There is no way for a teacher with a regular classroom to deal with that far off the norm, just as dealing with IQ's in the 70's and below really is not doable in regular classroom.
Special schools for the gifted, not 'gifted' classes are the best recourse. Truth is, homeschooling works better than regular classroom in most cases.
true, 'gifted' classes sucked
but gifted schools are undemocratic as are classes for the challenged
Are you sure you're a genius? seems like not. The point of school is for each child to get the educational experience that works for them, not to whitewash human difference. Or maybe...?
i was being sarcastic
too many school boards have decided that students need to have the experience of going to school with their age peers rather than with their intelligence peers
i am not doing well these days, my doctor has spotted a 'dark' spot in my neck that looks like the thyroidectomy did not get all of the cancerous materials and i go in next week for various scans and tests
true, 'gifted' classes sucked
but gifted schools are undemocratic as are classes for the challenged
The educational profession emphasizes the ideal that every student should graduate from high school, and thus you can see a concerted effort in all areas to achieve that goal. Differentiated instruction is an attempt to "teach to all students" and not just certain ones, which is a common charge made about the education system in the past.
There are of course, many other areas in which changes have occurred to help yield this ideal, and many people believe that quality of education has been sacrificed in favor of quantity of graduates. Is this your guys' assessment of the matter?
On the philosophy front, Thomas Dewey reigns supreme...
Dewey was a socialist who served to ultimately undermine classical education.