Evander Holyfield says homosexuality not normally.

NOVA said:
a harmless joke when Hillary says it....a mortal racist sin if it was Romney or any Conservative.

How about....

“White folks was in caves while we was building empires… We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
- Rev. Al Sharpton

Did this bring out any liberal rage ?
Click to expand...

Honestly? I pay zero attention to Sharpton and no real interest in researching his quotes.
 
Rana said:
Was it a recent quote, I am sure it would now, when did Al state this?
Click to expand...

Indeed, who could forget the dulcet tones of Sharpton’s 1994 speech at New Jersey’s Kean College, where he lavished an audience of students and professors with pearls of eloquence and sensitivity like this:
“White folks was in the caves while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”[1]

Lest you think that Sharpton was being unkind in his reference to homosexuals, he subsequently explained that while his use of the word “homos” may have been “irresponsible,” it certainly “is not a homophobic term”[2]—leaving us to conclude that he probably meant to use the word only in its best sense. “Ho,” as Sharpton would lecture us in the wake of Don Imus’s April 2007 “nappy-headed hos” fiasco, is supremely offensive. But “homo,” technically, is not. Get it?
Click to expand...

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/articles/outragedagainsharptonrecord.html
 
NOVA said:
So if an 'emperor' is a pedophile and its also 'accepted' in some prison, by your logic, that would also not considered deviant behavior ?.....morons.

does 1+1=3 in your world ?
Click to expand...

Most cultures do not classify people by their sexual encounters, and in some societies, particularly the much-admired classical Greek one, homosexual relationships were held to be higher than the heterosexual ones most men also entered into. You are a temporal provincial. Read more.
 
iolo said:
Most cultures do not classify people by their sexual encounters, and in some societies, particularly the much-admired classical Greek one, homosexual relationships were held to be higher than the heterosexual ones most men also entered into. You are a temporal provincial. Read more.
Click to expand...

I am not sure that all their sexual practices were admired, of course in Wales it is the sheep that are much admired by the menfolk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece
 
iolo said:
Most cultures do not classify people by their sexual encounters, and in some societies, particularly the much-admired classical Greek one, homosexual relationships were held to be higher than the heterosexual ones most men also entered into. You are a temporal provincial. Read more.
Click to expand...

Love of a female was for procreation, real love was man love!

My the times have changed! Or maybe not ;)
 
Damocles said:
So you have no reasoned argument how "normal" could set the standard for exclusion then. Got it. This is a child's argument to begin with. It isn't normal for me to treat childlike simplicity with respect, such as asking for your logical reasoning.

Let's go into something sexually not "normal" but for which you wouldn't exclude people from participation in society. Some people have a balloon fetish, they get sexually excited by popping balloons, this isn't "normal" behavior yet also not behavior that would prompt you to exclude them from society. Tell me what is the reason that one "not normal" behavior is more important than the other.
Click to expand...

As per the bolded part; you're the one comparing homosexuality with flying airplanes and doctors; dense to say the least.

I think my argument was cogent and fact based. Men were not intended to mate with men. Women were not intended to mate with women. It is aberrant behavior that defies nature and God. It isn't very complicated unless you want to appear stupid.

Now you are free to tell me how being sexually oriented towards those of the same sex is somehow "normal" and "intended", I am all eyes. Excuse if I laugh out loud at your attempts and childlike comparisons to flying airplanes and doctors.
 
Truth Detector said:
As per the bolded part; you're the one comparing homosexuality with flying airplanes and doctors; dense to say the least.

I think my argument was cogent and fact based. Men were not intended to mate with men. Women were not intended to mate with women. It is aberrant behavior that defies nature and God. It isn't very complicated unless you want to appear stupid.

Now you are free to tell me how being sexually oriented towards those of the same sex is somehow "normal" and "intended", I am all eyes. Excuse if I laugh out loud at your attempts and childlike comparisons to flying airplanes and doctors.
Click to expand...

I am pointing out that "not normal" means something, and much of the time it means things you care nothing about. It isn't "normal" you are worried about, it is things you find "icky". Things that are not "normal" that you find not to be icky you are fine with. This is why "normal" is a child's argument. Too many things aren't "normal" to make this even close to a reasonable argument.

The "Men are not intended to mate" thing is just nonsense. Men are hardwired to do what they like, those men find something pleasurable that you find gross. What they are doing doesn't hurt you at all, but you still want it cast away into hidden corners.

Since you find what they like to be icky, you want it to be cast from your sight. I get that, but it is an emotional and childish reaction. What they do that doesn't hurt you is simply none of your danged business, including who they want to "marry" or where.
 
SJJRSJJS said:
And look what happened to the "Fall of The Roman Empire"? Also, how would you know about this Emperor Hadrian, do you study gay history, like I study Communism? I read a lot and I never knew about this dude, but I will try to find out what happened to him and his Right hand men, no pun intended.
Click to expand...

last I checked the fall of the roman empire happened when they converted to christianity. Things were cruising for them for nearly a thousand years while they were pagans. As soon as constantine brought jesus into the fold and he named a city after himself... well shit that was the beginning of the end.

do you study gay history,
Click to expand...

nope, it's pretty common knowledge if you know a bit about the emperors and roman history.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top