Casual Leftist
Verified User
There's nothing wrong with wanting both.
Wow - Jesus literally said you cannot have 2 masters.
There's nothing wrong with wanting both.
That would require reading it as Jesus talking to his disciples in the 3rd person. But while you fixate on a possible mistake you drop everything else - namely the words that were said to the rich man - a message not just for those 12 to observe.
Absolutely. We have a family member who, for a brief time, lived in a HUD-managed apartment complex. The nearby evangelical church occasionally had offerings of used clothing and canned food for the complex's residents, which of course came with invitations to attend the church. That was okay; obviously no one was forced to go there to get free stuff. But they also canvassed the complex weekly with some of their more zealous parishioners, some of whom would not take no for an answer. They especially liked it when a child answered the door, as you might imagine... their firewalls aren't as strong as adults'.
You're right about that "Prosperity Gospel." They have forgotten the words of their own gods, in exchange for material wealth.
"But if anyone has the world's goods and sees his brother in need, yet closes his heart against him, how does God's love abide in him?" -- Jesus, 1 John 3:17
"“If among you, one of your brothers should become poor, in any of your towns within your land that the Lord your God is giving you, you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother, but you shall open your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be. Take care lest there be an unworthy thought in your heart and you say, ‘The seventh year, the year of release is near,’ and your eye look grudgingly on your poor brother, and you give him nothing, and he cry to the Lord against you, and you be guilty of sin. You shall give to him freely, and your heart shall not be grudging when you give to him, because for this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in all that you undertake. For there will never cease to be poor in the land. Therefore I command you, ‘You shall open wide your hand to your brother, to the needy and to the poor, in your land.’" -- God, Deut. 15: 7-11
Indeed2 Thessalonians 3:8 ESV
Nor did we eat anyone's bread without paying for it, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not be a burden to any of you.
Today, 11:18 AM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.
Today, 11:24 AM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.
I don't need to disprove demmycunt memes.........they fail on the weight of their own stupidity.....
really?......so killing unborn children isn't a constitutional right that needs to be protected?.....
...new definitions of marriage don't have to be imposed on the public when even the majority of Californifucks vote against it?
.....the world isn't going to drown if the government doesn't require you to stop driving cars?......
Translation:
LOOK AT ME - LOOK AT ME
The cry of a coward.
but the assertion of secular values in government is the assertion of a secular ideology......just because its a really sick and evil ideology doesn't mean its not an ideology......A lack of christian values in government is not an ideology. .
the complaint of a demmycunt meme-tosser.....
but the assertion of secular values in government is the assertion of a secular ideology......just because its a really sick and evil ideology doesn't mean its not an ideology......
I'm able to talk about the nuance of ideology, all you have is name calling. You're boring AF.
Ah, so the Founders were sick and evil when they brought about their secular Constitutional government.
lol.....no.....the founders didn't suggest killing unborn children was a good thing.......or pretending marriage was the relationship between people of the same sex.........
They proposed a government free of the influence of Christian dogma. The founders did mention naturally born citizens - didn't mention rights to the unborn citizen. If you can provide non-relgious arguments as to why abortion and gay marriage should be illegal under the Constitution then put forth a case in a new topic relevant thread. But you cannot deny the US was intended to be secular -that's not an imposition of political ideology other than the church doesn't get a say. But 'not getting a say' doesn't tell us anything about what policy will be put forth.
They proposed a government free of the influence of Christian dogma. The founders did mention naturally born citizens - didn't mention rights to the unborn citizen. If you can provide non-relgious arguments as to why abortion and gay marriage should be illegal under the Constitution then put forth a case in a new topic relevant thread. But you cannot deny the US was intended to be secular -that's not an imposition of political ideology other than the church doesn't get a say. But 'not getting a say' doesn't tell us anything about what policy will be put forth.
Wow - Jesus literally said you cannot have 2 masters.
Oops. Not happening, but maybe if you go create a tribute thread for her your toxic gf might quote you in hopes that I'll see it and respond to your pathetic attention whoring.
Today, 11:44 AM
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
This message is hidden because USFREEDOM911 is on your ignore list.