Executive Order #13524

Norman Paperman said:
Well this is disturbing news indeed.
Click to expand...

its unbelievable....and just today jarod was moaning about how bush stole our freedoms etc....

what is the purpose of granting an international police agency total immunity or am i reading this wrong....are you aware they have an office in the DOJ?
 
Actually, I did know they had an office in the DOJ, I'm not sure why or how I knew this...

I, for one, would like to know why an international law enforcement agency, assisting a court we as a nation are not a signatory to has been elevated to a status above our Constitution on U.S. soil. It makes me wonder, is this a precursor to Obama subjecting the United States to the jurisdiction of the ICC?

I am not one who has ever bought into the whole NWO idea, but I have to say, things like this do make me question my own opinion.
 
Last edited:
CaptBillyTheKid said:
It depends what exemptions are present in the articles mentioned.
Click to expand...

http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/...egal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/

It essentially eliminates the ability for Americans to hold Interpol agents accountable. We no longer have the ability to access information from Interpol via a FOIA request.

Interpol agents are now free to act in the US with complete immunity.

Both of the above were exceptions that Reagan spelled out so that Americans would have access to the information and be able to hold Interpol agents to the same level of standards as the FBI and other American law enforcement agencies.
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
It depends what exemptions are present in the articles mentioned.
Click to expand...

http://www.ipu.org/finance-e/PL79-291.pdf

the act ^

at least the way i read it, maybe i'm wrong, obama takes away the exceptions to immunities from 2(c) and pretty much grants them full immunity

Property and assets of international organizations, wherever located and by whomsoever held, shall be immune from search, unless such immunity be expressly waived, and from confiscation. The archives of international organizations shall be inviolable.

reagan did not allow interpol to have those immunities listed in 2(c)....obama has given them those immunities
 
Superfreak said:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/...egal-constraints-as-american-law-enforcement/

It essentially eliminates the ability for Americans to hold Interpol agents accountable. We no longer have the ability to access information from Interpol via a FOIA request.

Interpol agents are now free to act in the US with complete immunity.

Both of the above were exceptions that Reagan spelled out so that Americans would have access to the information and be able to hold Interpol agents to the same level of standards as the FBI and other American law enforcement agencies.
Click to expand...

Then my rage towards this administration shall know no bounds.
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
It depends what exemptions are present in the articles mentioned.
Click to expand...

http://www.ipu.org/finance-e/PL79-291.pdf

the effect of the amendment would be to make them immune to search and confiscation. 2C specifically speaks of the archives of international organizations.

Section 3 deals with tariffs and duties on imports, Section 4 deals with income taxes due on incomes earned in the US by foreign diplomats (apparently we will now be taxing Interpol agents)......Section 5 deals with Social Security withholdings....Section 6 deals with property taxes due to the District of Columbia.....

a bit confusing though.....between the two orders I think there is a triple negative.....not sure if they used to be taxed and now won't be.....or weren't and now will be........
 
Last edited:
CaptBillyTheKid said:
Then my rage towards this administration shall know no bounds.
Click to expand...

I am looking for something... anything... to show this is a hoax. If this is real, then the collective rage of this country should be raised against this administration. The Patriot act was bad enough... this is quite frankly... an outrage.

Especially given the fact as the link I posted states...

It does mean, though, that Interpol officers would have diplomatic immunity for any lawbreaking conducted in the US at a time when Interpol nations (like Italy) have attempted to try American intelligence agents for their work in the war on terror, a rather interesting double standard.
Click to expand...
 
Superfreak said:
I am looking for something... anything... to show this is a hoax. If this is real, then the collective rage of this country should be raised against this administration. The Patriot act was bad enough... this is quite frankly... an outrage.

Especially given the fact as the link I posted states...
Click to expand...

Especially when viewed in conjunction with the brief the admin sent the supreme court in support of the no standing right not to be framed stance.
 
Superfreak said:
I am looking for something... anything... to show this is a hoax. If this is real, then the collective rage of this country should be raised against this administration. The Patriot act was bad enough... this is quite frankly... an outrage.

Especially given the fact as the link I posted states...
Click to expand...

you missed the link i gave in the OP....from the WH

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-amending-executive-order-12425

its no hoax, unless someone has hacked the WH website
 
anyone should clearly understand that as a socialist/communist politician, Obama is all for an ever increasing and completely unaccountable police force.....unaccountable to all except him. So, by restoring these immunities to INTERPOL, he will soon have his civilian security force that is not constrained by the constitution.

This is what Liberals want, that's why you're not hearing about it.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
anyone should clearly understand that as a socialist/communist politician, Obama is all for an ever increasing and completely unaccountable police force.....unaccountable to all except him. So, by restoring these immunities to INTERPOL, he will soon have his civilian security force that is not constrained by the constitution.

This is what Liberals want, that's why you're not hearing about it.
Click to expand...

i absolutely agree

interestingly, fox hasn't even talked about it, at least to my knowledge
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top