Exoplanet K2-18b

Doc Dutch said:
Anyone want to guess what's wrong with this picture?

tumblr_na9invhkBl1tvgexko1_400.gif
Click to expand...

Retrograde spin?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Retrograde spin?
Click to expand...

As the solar system coalesced, it began to spin and eventually everything began spinning in the same direction. IIRC, Mercury, like our own Moon, is basically gravity locked to facing the Sun; it rotates every 58 days but only takes 88 days to go around the Sun. Something knocked Uranus over so it's spinning almost 100 degrees off from the other planets, but its orbit remains counterclockwise like all other planets.

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/mercury/in-depth/
Mercury's highly eccentric, egg-shaped orbit takes the planet as close as 29 million miles (47 million kilometers) and as far as 43 million miles (70 million kilometers) from the Sun. It speeds around the Sun every 88 days, traveling through space at nearly 29 miles (47 kilometers) per second, faster than any other planet.

Mercury spins slowly on its axis and completes one rotation every 59 Earth days. But when Mercury is moving fastest in its elliptical orbit around the Sun (and it is closest to the Sun), each rotation is not accompanied by sunrise and sunset like it is on most other planets. The morning Sun appears to rise briefly, set, and rise again from some parts of the planet's surface. The same thing happens in reverse at sunset for other parts of the surface. One Mercury solar day (one full day-night cycle) equals 176 Earth days – just over two years on Mercury.
Click to expand...
 
Doc Dutch said:
As the solar system coalesced, it began to spin and eventually everything began spinning in the same direction. IIRC, Mercury, like our own Moon, is basically gravity locked to facing the Sun; it rotates every 58 days but only takes 88 days to go around the Sun. Something knocked Uranus over so it's spinning almost 100 degrees off from the other planets, but its orbit remains counterclockwise like all other planets.

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/mercury/in-depth/
Click to expand...

I think Venus is an outlier in that it rotates in the opposite direct to the rest of the planets. I don't remember why, but vaguely recall maybe Venus had a massive collision with a planetoid billions of years ago.
 
Cypress said:
I think Venus is an outlier in that it rotates in the opposite direct to the rest of the planets. I don't remember why, but vaguely recall maybe Venus had a massive collision with a planetoid billions of years ago.
Click to expand...

Good point. The NASA website doesn't explain why Venus rotates so slowly or in retrograde manner, but, from what I can understand, the Wiki link says it's a combination of the Sun's gravity and the dense Venusian atmosphere over the course of a billion years+ that have slowed the planet's rotation and started it moving in the opposite direction, albeit very slowly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venus#Orbit_and_rotation
All planets in the Solar System orbit the Sun in an anticlockwise direction as viewed from above Earth's north pole. Most planets rotate on their axes in an anticlockwise direction, but Venus rotates clockwise in retrograde rotation once every 243 Earth days—the slowest rotation of any planet. This Venusian sidereal day lasts therefore longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days).

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/venus/in-depth/
Spending a day on Venus would be quite a disorienting experience – that is, if your ship or suit could protect you from temperatures in the range of 900 degrees Fahrenheit (475 Celsius). For one thing, your “day” would be 243 Earth days long – longer even than a Venus year (one trip around the Sun), which takes only 225 Earth days. For another, because of the planet's extremely slow rotation, sunrise to sunset would take 117 Earth days. And by the way, the Sun would rise in the west and set in the east, because Venus spins backward compared to Earth.
 
Doc Dutch said:
What kind of life would exist in that atmosphere? The anaerobic life previously discussed?
Click to expand...

I'm not an expert and haven't read what the exobiologists say. But the absence of free oxygen in the atmosphere would likely indicate an absence of photosynthesis, and an associated biosphere that requires O[sub]2[/sub] for respiration.

That leaves you with chemosynthesis, or some other anerobic process for energy and metabolism.
 
Cypress said:
I'm not an expert and haven't read what the exobiologists say. But the absence of free oxygen in the atmosphere would likely indicate an absence of photosynthesis, and an associated biosphere that requires O[sub]2[/sub] for respiration.

That leaves you with chemosynthesis, or some other anerobic process for energy and metabolism.
Click to expand...

Ironically enough dimethyl sulfide is produced by PHYTOPLANKTON. That indicates photosynthesis must be happening at some level. Where is the O2?
 
Doc Dutch said:
Primary doesn't equal sole.

Still, the presence of DMS on K2 18B is a curious phenomenon. How do you explain it?
Click to expand...

Fair point. I honestly don't know. On the NASA page they note that "On Earth, this [DMS] is only produced by life. The bulk of the DMS in Earth’s atmosphere is emitted from phytoplankton in marine environments." (SOURCE)

I'm guessing there might be some other means of production of DMS that is possible, maybe even a non-life source? It's curious.
 
Oscillator said:
Fair point. I honestly don't know. On the NASA page they note that "On Earth, this [DMS] is only produced by life. The bulk of the DMS in Earth’s atmosphere is emitted from phytoplankton in marine environments." (SOURCE)

I'm guessing there might be some other means of production of DMS that is possible, maybe even a non-life source? It's curious.
Click to expand...

I'm certain NASA will take a look at it again over time to verify the results.
 
Doc Dutch said:
I'm certain NASA will take a look at it again over time to verify the results.
Click to expand...

Like I wrote earlier, NASA is not jumping to any conclusions. They are practicing good, objective science and intend to do a lot more confirmation and validation.
 
Cypress said:
Like I wrote earlier, NASA is not jumping to any conclusions. They are practicing good, objective science and intend to do a lot more confirmation and validation.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Also mentioned earlier is that NASA reports facts and the media seeks to make money. The dumbasses in our society do not understand the difference and, therefore, blame science.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Agreed. Also mentioned earlier is that NASA reports facts and the media seeks to make money. The dumbasses in our society do not understand the difference and, therefore, blame science.
Click to expand...

Trumpeting DSM as evidence of alien life your tabloid headline is good clickbait.
 
Cypress said:
Trumpeting DSM as evidence of alien life your tabloid headline is good clickbait.
Click to expand...

Agreed on both clickbait and tabloid fodder. Finding DMS is an interesting find, but, as you've mentioned previously, assuming things across the universe are the same as on Earth is a risky assumption.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top