Irish Exit
Verified User
^^^^Another inbred techno-optimist cult member who thinks big fonts lives matter because they are black.
Experts on Climate Change Assessment: ‘Every Conclusion of Latest Government false
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
^^^^Another inbred techno-optimist cult member who thinks big fonts lives matter because they are black.
^Another whiny snowflake who is on the verge of crying when he is called out for a buffoonish remark.
Irish Exit
Verified User
Maybe at Chik-Fil-A where all you white Christians eat they are called Freedom Fries, served up by straight white children, but not on Sunday, but in my house damn it, they are still called......well curly fries because those are the only ones we eat, but you get the picture
"It does not have the endorsement of this Administrarion," ah, who issued the report?
Are you trying now to tell us the Trump Adminstrarion released a report in thier name, which was approved by thirteen Administration Departments, that they didn't endorse? How does that happen? Has it ever happened before?
Out of your league here "fogcatcher"
Irish Exit
Verified User
^Another whiny snowflake who is on the verge of crying when he is called out for a buffoonish remark.
^^^^Another democrat who doesn't know that snowflakes have been extincted by global hot air.
Oh, I got it, now we got "AGW alarmists" in the Administration, now are they part of the "deep state," or a conspiratorial element of their own?
Just to bring you up to date, the report was conducted and approved by thirteen separate Departmemts in the Trump Administration, which last I knew, had Trump appointees heading those Departments, try to keep up
cancel2 2022
Canceled
They are no more dodgy than the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, or websites like Skeptical Science, started by John Cook of the infamous 97% consensus bullshit, or DeSmogBlog started by an embezzler and now run by a Canadian renewable energy PR company?
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Repeating the same bullshit over and over doesn't make it any more true, Trump had no choice it is the law.
Do you always have to be a whiny, dishonest moron on steroids? That was, of course, rhetorical.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
.
Here is a far more considered view on that travesty of a report!!
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...onal-climate-assessment-southeast/#more-36399
Here is a far more considered view on that travesty of a report!!
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...onal-climate-assessment-southeast/#more-36399
Last edited:
Perfect "fogcatcher," cites a source which he thinks discredits a 1600 page report by "analyzing one particular claim"
As I said previously, he creates a distorted paradigm, as if one "scientist" analyzing "one claim" equally measures against the preponderance of findings offered in the report.
Been there, done that, listed umpteen reputed Science organizations that support the theory of man made global warming and he'll return with couple two three fringe individuals off of an obvious website who he presents as a balance discrediting any evidence offered. Same old, same old
"truthie" is done, anytime he has to resort to regurgitating the same insults and corny copy and pastes you know he got anything more, like the towel hitting the canvas
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
I've yet to see anything OTHER than that from him.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
You're a total waste of time, can't be bothered with a fool like you anymore. All you ever do is spout platitudes, clichés and nonsense.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Scientists rip new federal climate report as ‘tripe’ – ’embarrassing’ – ‘systematically flawed’ – Key claim based on study funded by Steyer & Bloomberg
Climate expert Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: The claim of economic damage from climate change is based on a 15 degree F temp increase that is double the "most extreme value reported elsewhere in the report." The "sole editor" of this claim in the report was an alumni of the Center for American Progress, which is also funded by Tom Styer."
Climate analyst Paul Homewood: ‘Cherry picks’ a few bad weather events…extrapolates using the most scary scenarios’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels on the report: ‘Systematically flawed’ – Report ‘should be shelved’
Dr. Ken Haapala: 'The global warming chorus immediately seized on the new USGCRP report claiming the Trump administration is contradicting President Trump’s claims about global warming. Amusingly, some of the chorus interviewed people who worked on the USGCRP, who were political appointees under the Obama Administration.'
Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore: "The science must be addressed head-on. If POTUS has his reasons for letting this Obama-era committee continue to peddle tripe I wish he would tell us what they are."
Dr. John Dunn: "Two years into the Trump administration it is sad to see this 400-page pile of crap."
Climate Depot's Morano: "It is a political report masquerading as science. The media is hyping a rehash of frightening climate change claims by Obama administration holdover activist government scientists. The new report is once again pre-determined science. The National Climate Assessment report reads like a press release from environmental pressure groups — because it is!
Two key authors are longtime Union of Concerned Scientist activists, Donald Wuebbles and Katharine Hayhoe.
MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen wrote of the National Academy of Sciences: "Regardless of evidence the answer is predetermined. If the government wants carbon control, that is the answer that the Academies will provide."
http://www.climatedepot.com/2018/11...ey-claim-based-on-study-funded-by-tom-steyer/
Climate expert Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: The claim of economic damage from climate change is based on a 15 degree F temp increase that is double the "most extreme value reported elsewhere in the report." The "sole editor" of this claim in the report was an alumni of the Center for American Progress, which is also funded by Tom Styer."
Climate analyst Paul Homewood: ‘Cherry picks’ a few bad weather events…extrapolates using the most scary scenarios’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels on the report: ‘Systematically flawed’ – Report ‘should be shelved’
Dr. Ken Haapala: 'The global warming chorus immediately seized on the new USGCRP report claiming the Trump administration is contradicting President Trump’s claims about global warming. Amusingly, some of the chorus interviewed people who worked on the USGCRP, who were political appointees under the Obama Administration.'
Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore: "The science must be addressed head-on. If POTUS has his reasons for letting this Obama-era committee continue to peddle tripe I wish he would tell us what they are."
Dr. John Dunn: "Two years into the Trump administration it is sad to see this 400-page pile of crap."
Climate Depot's Morano: "It is a political report masquerading as science. The media is hyping a rehash of frightening climate change claims by Obama administration holdover activist government scientists. The new report is once again pre-determined science. The National Climate Assessment report reads like a press release from environmental pressure groups — because it is!
Two key authors are longtime Union of Concerned Scientist activists, Donald Wuebbles and Katharine Hayhoe.
MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen wrote of the National Academy of Sciences: "Regardless of evidence the answer is predetermined. If the government wants carbon control, that is the answer that the Academies will provide."
http://www.climatedepot.com/2018/11...ey-claim-based-on-study-funded-by-tom-steyer/
Last edited:
Then amazing he goes out and does the exact same thing again, he'll never get it
"climate depot," a site funded by Exon, supported by Scaife, and headed by a guy who got his start working for Rush Limbaugh, what the blueberries did you think it was going to say?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/climate-depot/
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Climate_Depot