far right rushes to embrace Tucker Carlson’s FBI-Capitol riot conspiracy theory

Lionfish said:
Summed up, the-alt leftie trolls are scared shitless of Tucker Carlson.
Click to expand...

Sure we are.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully. According to the judge that no reasonable person should take what Tucker Carlson says seriously.
 
guno said:
Screwy Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.) rose to speak on the floor of the House on Thursday, a sheaf of news articles in his hand and the spirit of a Breitbart commenter in his heart.

There’s been so much appropriate concern about January 6,” Gohmert said. “What happened that day. Unfortunately, we don’t know all that happened that day. There are some major, major questions that need to be answered.”

Among them? A report that had been elevated the night prior by Gohmert’s “friend,” Fox News host Tucker Carlson: that perhaps a significant part of the violence that day was spurred by FBI agents embedded in the crowd.

“This is scary stuff,” Gohmert said of the sketchy claims made by Carlson. “This is third-world stuff. This is not only third-world stuff but this is like [Russian President Vladimir] Putin kind of activity.”

The sketchy and quickly debunked claims made by Carlson. The Fox News host was elevating a story written for the website Revolver by a former Trump administration official (later fired for links to white nationalists) arguing that “unindicted co-conspirators” referred to in Justice Department charging documents referred to government law enforcement agents.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...t-conspiracy-theory/ar-AALbKp7?ocid=Peregrine
Click to expand...

it's not a theory, deep state lie-bag.
 
no worries said:
Sure we are.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully. According to the judge that no reasonable person should take what Tucker Carlson says seriously.
Click to expand...

:tardthoughts:
 
no worries said:
Sure we are.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully. According to the judge that no reasonable person should take what Tucker Carlson says seriously.
Click to expand...

I love judges' rulings. This one sounds like it had the teeth of a blowfish.

I am soooo happy Tucker continues to trigger the alt-lefties.
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
You have any proof whatsoever he's wrong? Who "debunked" them? Certainly not CNN or MSNBC, they've been too focused on Trump to notice something like this...
Click to expand...

It was Fox's claim. Therefore they have to provide the proof. You really do not know how that works? I can make any claim and it is your job to prove it wrong? You have it backward..
 
AssHatZombie said:
you're an imbecile.
Click to expand...

I'm not the moron listening to the Huckster.

September 28 2020

The latest example of this is Tucker Carlson, who last week was thrown under the bus by his own network in court when they claimed that NO REASONABLE PERSON would take Tucker’s comments seriously.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully.

That makes you the imbecile.
 
no worries said:
I'm not the moron listening to the Huckster.

September 28 2020

The latest example of this is Tucker Carlson, who last week was thrown under the bus by his own network in court when they claimed that NO REASONABLE PERSON would take Tucker’s comments seriously.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully.

That makes you the imbecile.
Click to expand...

Carlson has spent entire shows calling out major Republican donors in the past, so it wouldn't be surprising if the only reason he has a show is because of the high ratings. The upper management of Fox is very much part of the establishment elite, whereas Carlson is more of a populist, which puts him at odds with the establishment in terms of stances.

It's a clever legal argument though. It's similar to the one that was used by Alex Jones.

The difference is that Carlson does take himself seriously, so maybe he should leave Fox for an outlet that doesn't view him in this light.
 
no worries said:
I'm not the moron listening to the Huckster.

September 28 2020

The latest example of this is Tucker Carlson, who last week was thrown under the bus by his own network in court when they claimed that NO REASONABLE PERSON would take Tucker’s comments seriously.

Late last week, a federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone. That’s actually a part of the ruling by the way. Uh, and the reason by the way that this judge ruled Tucker Carlson should not be taken seriously by anyone is because lawyers for Fox news who were fighting a defamation suit against Tucker actually went into court and argued successfully.

That makes you the imbecile.
Click to expand...

shut your filth hole.
 
Pax Mongolica said:
Carlson has spent entire shows calling out major Republican donors in the past, so it wouldn't be surprising if the only reason he has a show is because of the high ratings. The upper management of Fox is very much part of the establishment elite, whereas Carlson is more of a populist, which puts him at odds with the establishment in terms of stances.

It's a clever legal argument though. It's similar to the one that was used by Alex Jones.

The difference is that Carlson does take himself seriously, so maybe he should leave Fox for an outlet that doesn't view him in this light.
Click to expand...

Another loon made the same claim.

March 22 2021
Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Admits In Court That Her Rigged Election Claims Were Total Bullshit That ‘No Reasonable Person’ Should Have Believed".

A former lawyer for Donald Trump who made several false claims of voter fraud in regard to the 2020 presidential election is now arguing that “no reasonable person” would have believed her conspiracy theories.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top