Neither would oppose censorship. A very stupid question. You can do better.
A person more concerned with the collective, not the individual. It puts people into groups. It abuses the groups it does not like and supports the ones that toe their line. That is what you fraudulently elected. The purge is going to backfire.
Lol, collectivists seem to make more sense.
We are made up of groups, family, ethnicity, religion & nation among political ones.
Individualists appear to be socially detached from groups.
Our Constitution is about individual rights. We do not do collectives.That is what the Democrats wants because that is what China wants.
What Individual rights, by the Founding Fathers!?
They would be borderline Fascist by today's standards.
The Founding Fathers only allowed 6% of the USA to vote,or White land owning men.
Their Naturalization Act of 1790 only allowed Free Whites of good character to become USA citizens.?
Even corporate charters were super strict.
Even universal stock ownership was discussed & they had revolutionary healthcare for all sailors in the An Act for the relief of sick and disabled seamen.
Our Constitution is about individual rights. We do not do collectives.That is what the Democrats wants because that is what China wants.
What about the Individual rights of Capitalist enterprise!?
China has Communist capitalism, soon ours will be a mirror image.

I am not a lawyer or an economist.

Naw, you're just a run-of-the-mill dumbfuck.
![]()
Flynn was lying over and over about Biden and Trump. He should still be in jail. Sydney was a crazed incompetent righty who jor thrown out of court for stupid cases and is now being sure by Dominion for 1.3 billion dollars.
Welcome to the Communist States Of America.
https://thefederalist.com/2021/01/0...lice-open-the-doors-and-invite-protesters-in/
And you just the run of the mill troll.
