Into the Night
Verified User
Okay. She is accelerating her car into an officer in front of the car. He's the one the fired the shots.Watch the entire video in post 305 and you'll see that's not what happened. Focus on 2:20 and forward.
Okay. She is accelerating her car into an officer in front of the car. He's the one the fired the shots.Watch the entire video in post 305 and you'll see that's not what happened. Focus on 2:20 and forward.
His own link is proving him wrong, Phanty.He’s not going to see it, he’s made up his mind, no evidence will change it.
So you can keep braying that line like Maga jackass until doomsday. BUT the detailed video totally debunks the White House narrative. All you've got are a bunch of Maga smoke coupled with moot points.So she attempted to run down a federal agent in order to evade arrest.
We already know this.
You support the assault and attempted murder of police because you don't like the laws they enforce. Laws passed by the bipartisan, elected members of congress.
But you hate democracy and instead promote mob rule.
That's the thing, gumby.... it's not edited. That's the same footage frame for frame that originally was released to the public and commented on by the Trump chumps claiming it vindicates Ross. What you have in the NY Times video STOPPING the video in order to highlight EXACTLY Ross' movements in relation to the moving car. Even the body cam footage shows Ross adjacent to the left headlight MOVING IN AND PARTIALLY ONTO THE HOOD AS THE CAR IS TURNING AWAY FROM HIM.Even that heavily edited video shows clearly that she struck him with her vehicle.
We get that you of the insurrection object to laws passed by the elected members of congress. However in a democracy, the correct action is to elect representatives who support the laws you prefer.
You of the insurrection instead choose to obstruct, assault, and attempt to murder police who are enforcing those laws.
You don't have the right to kill police because you object to the laws they enforce.
They had no jurisdiction or authority to extricate her from her car. Violation of her constitutional right to unreasonable search and seizure. That’s just fir starters.ICE enforces immigration law dummy
Enforcement is in the name
She was asking for trouble and she found it. Tragic but unavoidable on her part. Hopefully other leftists learn not to play such games
One more time.That's not why the dumb bitch was shot ass wipe but you have to keep up the narrative right? Bad things happen when you fuck with law enforcement officials. That's not fascism that's common fucking sense which you completely lack.
Yep. Except that’s not what happened here. Not one video indicates she was driving at him or that he was struck. Just the opposite.I believe that driving a car at them can make them defend their lives.
These guys are not officers. They had no authority to extricate her from her car. Unreasonable search and seizure to start. Finish with murder charges.Do you believe that shouting at an officer and not obeying an officer makes it okay for him to kill you?
So you can keep braying that line like Maga jackass until doomsday. BUT the detailed video totally debunks the White House narrative. All you've got are a bunch of Maga smoke coupled with moot points.
Let us all know when you can point for point, logically refute the conclusion of the NY Times video. We'll wait.
That's the thing, gumby.... it's not edited. That's the same footage frame for frame that originally was released to the public and commented on by the Trump chumps claiming it vindicates Ross. What you have in the NY Times video STOPPING the video in order to highlight EXACTLY Ross' movements in relation to the moving car. Even the body cam footage shows Ross adjacent to the left headlight MOVING IN AND PARTIALLY ONTO THE HOOD AS THE CAR IS TURNING AWAY FROM HIM.
The rest of your post is the usual BS you get from Noem, Patel, Bondi, Vance and the rest to the Cheeto Jeezus clown show.
We already did this dance, gumby (posts #344 and #345). The body cam footage clearly shows Ross moving ADJACENT to the left headlight as he proceeds to MOVE IN towards the car as it begins to move. The car IS TURNING RIGHT, AWAY FROM ROSS. He jostles further left, firing 3 times.The fact remains. You support the assault and attempted murder of police because you don't like the laws they enforce. Laws passed by the bipartisan, elected members of congress.
Fuck the little Goebbels.
View: https://x.com/townhallcom/status/2009687784420978812?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2009687784420978812%7Ctwgr%5Efd23c34b2361896e23a2eb724893637bc8492f23%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2026%2F01%2F09%2Fwell-the-latest-video-of-the-ice-shooting-in-minneapolis-just-nuked-the-lefts-murder-narrative-n2669187
Timestamp 0:42
She hit him with her car. I don't care what Nazi vermin say to try and lie it away - she hit him with her car as she attempted to evade arrest.
That you promote violence against police because they are enforcing laws you don't like doesn't change reality.
And when faced with irrefutable evidenced; www.instagram.com/reel/DTQT6VrAX-Q/Here's the thing Comrade Insurrectionist, Good struck a federal officer with her car as she attempted to evade felony arrest for obstructing law enforcement in the performance of their duty.
I understand that your party objects to the immigration laws they helped pass. But you don't have the right to obstruct, assault, or kill police for enforcing laws you don't like. If you assault officers with a deadly weapon, then you run a high risk of death.
Don't take my word for it, try it for yourself. Borrow a car and try to run down a police officer in your area - then report back to us.
Lie.So you can keep braying that line like Maga jackass until doomsday. BUT the detailed video totally debunks the White House narrative.
MAGA isn't smoke, Libby.All you've got are a bunch of Maga smoke coupled with moot points.
RQAA.Let us all know when you can point for point, logically refute the conclusion of the NY Times video. We'll wait.
It also clearly shows the feet of officer in front getting hit, and firing his shots.That's the thing, gumby.... it's not edited. That's the same footage frame for frame that originally was released to the public and commented on by the Trump chumps claiming it vindicates Ross. What you have in the NY Times video STOPPING the video in order to highlight EXACTLY Ross' movements in relation to the moving car. Even the body cam footage shows Ross adjacent to the left headlight MOVING IN AND PARTIALLY ONTO THE HOOD AS THE CAR IS TURNING AWAY FROM HIM.
The rest of your post is the usual BS you get from Noem, Patel, Bondi, Vance and the rest to the Cheeto Jeezus clown show.
They had both jurisdiction and the authority.They had no jurisdiction or authority to extricate her from her car.
It was not a search, Dumber.Violation of her constitutional right to unreasonable search and seizure. That’s just fir starters.
He was hit. He suffered internal injuries as a result of it too.Every video I’ve seen clearly shows he was not hit and, in fact, was drawing for his weapon immediately.
No trial, Dumber. The driver BROKE THE LAW by interfering with federal officers, BROKE THE LAW by failing to following lawful orders, and BROKE THE LAW by attempting to run over a federal officer, and BROKE THE LAW by attempting to flee.This fucker is toast at trial.
Lie. An ICE officer is a law enforcement officer.One more time.
ICE is not law enforcement.
Not a traffic stop, Dumber.They have no authority to engage in traffic stops like this nor try to extricate her from her car.
They violated nothing, Dumber. DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!They violated safety, training, jurisdiction, authority and the Constitution. This was an unreasonable search and seizure.
No trial.This fucker is toast at trial.
Lie.Yep. Except that’s not what happened here. Not one video indicates she was driving at him or that he was struck. Just the opposite.
No trial.This fucker is toast at trial.
The are federal officers.These guys are not officers.
They have all the authority they need.They had no authority to extricate her from her car.
No search was conducted until afterwards, and it was valid.Unreasonable search and seizure to start.
No murder.Finish with murder charges.