FBI completes Clinton email probe, recommends no criminal charges

Comey was forced IMO to ignore the law with regards to the lying liar Hellary.

His outlining her guilt was his attempt at justice in the midst of the corrupt Obama administration.
 
The Democrats are the party of lying liars who believe their agenda is so important that the ends (lies) justifies the means (more lies)
 
anatta said:
unbelievable. explaining his actions by statement is "smearing"

according to the Clintonistas the entire decision making process should have been done by 1 man..and with no words of explanation.
awesome.
Click to expand...

Need an ointment for your butt hurt?
 
anatta said:
my bad. because this is the final action since Lynch has recused/semi-recused herself - he is indeed prosecutor and jury.
what a colossal conglomeration of powers to one man. definitely not how our justice system should work.
Click to expand...

Liar she didn't recuse herself.
 
The last time I saw this much evidence without a conviction was the O.J. Simpson case. #Comey ( Tweet)
 
She wiped servers, she lied about wanting to use a single device. She lied about sending classified information. The woman is a devious liar.

If not, then she's clearly too incompetent to be president.
 
Rune said:
Need an ointment for your butt hurt?
Click to expand...

Their tears fall like a refreshing summer rain.
They cry and wail because this hope for a Clinton indictment was the only outside chance they had of electing the great orange racist. Now today that hope has evaporated.
The smart ones realize this.
The stupider ones still think Trump has a chance.
LOL
 
Rune said:
No retard.
Prosecutors bring cases to grand juries only if the facts are sufficient to indict.

Does the butt hurt never end?
Click to expand...
Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification.....

Now let me tell you what we found:

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government.

With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...lary-clintons-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Alright Legal-Beagle - now tell us why a grand jury referral wasn't in the best interest of justice here??
 
She's above the law. The FBI is corrupted by the clintons and Obama.

There's no way Obama's DOJ or AG would ever bring charges against their darling. Especially now that he's campaigning for her.

Bill put Loretta lying Lynch in place.

The whole system is corrupt. She was clearly culpable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top