FBI completes Clinton email probe, recommends no criminal charges

Fuck you. You will never make a war hawk, racist, misogynistic, muck raking or pro-police state post without my comment.
It is still a free country despite you.
suit yourself. your problem is your comments are 99% asinine. The other 1% are worthless personal attacks
start posting some solid critiques ABOUT IDEAS and i'll be more then happy to engage.
 
suit yourself. your problem is your comments are 99% asinine. The other 1% are worthless personal attacks
start posting some solid critiques ABOUT IDEAS and i'll be more then happy to engage.

I am here to point to your war mongering, fear peddling, muckraking and dulplicity.
I couldn't care less wheter you engage or not.
 
I am here to point to your war mongering, fear peddling, muckraking and dulplicity.
I couldn't care less wheter you engage or not.
...but you are still stuck on stupid!

"muckraking" is a joke; you couldn't do the Google if your life depended on it. warmongering is a Hillary trait - as is duplicity.
fear peddling? that's new....you forgot misogynist...
 
...but you are still stuck on stupid!

"muckraking" is a joke; you couldn't do the Google if your life depended on it. warmongering is a Hillary trait - as is duplicity.
fear peddling? that's new....you forgot misogynist...

Muckraking is exactly what you have been doing to Hillary for months on end.
In other threads you peddle fear...the bombing Saudi Arabia thread being the perfect example; Saudi Arabi has n incredibly stable true monarchy, amongst the most stable ever.

A house of cards it is not.

Further claiming ISIS is an existential threat borders on hysteria, the ultimate fear mongering.
You are a fearful foolish child who would gladly trade liberty for freedom, a spineless coward.
 
Muckraking is exactly what you have been doing to Hillary for months on end.
In other threads you peddle fear...the bombing Saudi Arabia thread being the perfect example; Saudi Arabi has n incredibly stable true monarchy, amongst the most stable ever.

A house of cards it is not.

Further claiming ISIS is an existential threat borders on hysteria, the ultimate fear mongering.
You are a fearful foolish child who would gladly trade liberty for freedom, a spineless coward.
nobody said SA was a "hose of cards" -it was merely pointed out that SA is at risk as is any ME state from ISIS ( both jihad and ultra-Salafism).
The House has a shifting population of more younger foreign educated youth, coupled with a dire clergy, and a poor economy based on oil revenue entitlements.
remove any of those pillars and the place can quickly collapse - just like any other ME state.

ISIS is an existential threat -if you cannot see that -then there isn't any reason to continue.
it's goal is a apocalypse in our lifetime - and the caliphate is a step in that direction.

"muckraking" is exactly what the FBI investigation was about.. since you are too stupidly partisan i'm not going to describe it.
Have you read Comeys statement yet? * of course not*
 
This dude Sally Kohn of CNN just tweeted:

Sally Kohn ‏@sallykohn · 26m26 minutes ago

Sally Kohn Retweeted Jerry the Bastage

Uh, actually FBI not prosecuting *literally* means there wasn't evidence of illegal wrongdoing!!!!


Uh, the FBI said she broke the law but they still aren't prosecuting. How did this dude get on a national news station and be this ignorant?
 
nobody said SA was a "hose of cards" -it was merely pointed out that SA is at risk as is any ME state from ISIS ( both jihad and ultra-Salafism).
The House has a shifting population of more younger foreign educated youth, coupled with a dire clergy, and a poor economy based on oil revenue entitlements.
remove any of those pillars and the place can quickly collapse - just like any other ME state.

ISIS is an existential threat -if you cannot see that -then there isn't any reason to continue.
it's goal is a apocalypse in our lifetime - and the caliphate is a step in that direction.

"muckraking" is exactly what the FBI investigation was about.. since you are too stupidly partisan i'm not going to describe it.
Have you read Comeys statement yet? * of course not*

Unreal.
No, the FBI invetigation is real.
Muckraking is what your anti Hillary threads are. You don't get to redefine words to suit you.

Yes I read the statement.
No criminal intent, ie no charges.
I know you don't understand but without criminal intent there is no crime ie with criminal intent a homicide is murder, without it is
Manslaughter.
Intent is very importantin criminal procedings.

ISIS is in no way shape or form an existential threat to us. This is classic fear peddling also known as beating the drums of war. You excel at this.

As to the house of cards YOU said it.
No Saudi Arabia is not as vulnerable as any other MEcountry suggest you research some before you continue this tact, you couldn't be more incorrect.
 
Unreal.
No, the FBI invetigation is real.
Muckraking is what your anti Hillary threads are. You don't get to redefine words to suit you.

Yes I read the statement.
No criminal intent, ie no charges.
I know you don't understand but without criminal intent there is no crime ie with criminal intent a homicide is murder, without it is
Manslaughter.
Intent is very importantin criminal procedings.

ISIS is in no way shape or form an existential threat to us. This is classic fear peddling also known as beating the drums of war. You excel at this.

As to the house of cards YOU said it.
No Saudi Arabia is not as vulnerable as any other MEcountry suggest you research some before you continue this tact, you couldn't be more incorrect.

I still think this is one of the best arguments I have read on the issue. It is why I never thought there would be a indictment.

http://lawnewz.com/politics/nothing...secute-hillary-clinton-based-on-what-we-know/
 
nobody said SA was a "hose of cards" -it was merely pointed out that SA is at risk as is any ME state from ISIS ( both jihad and ultra-Salafism).
The House has a shifting population of more younger foreign educated youth, coupled with a dire clergy, and a poor economy based on oil revenue entitlements.
remove any of those pillars and the place can quickly collapse - just like any other ME state.

ISIS is an existential threat -if you cannot see that -then there isn't any reason to continue.
it's goal is a apocalypse in our lifetime - and the caliphate is a step in that direction.

"muckraking" is exactly what the FBI investigation was about.. since you are too stupidly partisan i'm not going to describe it.
Have you read Comeys statement yet? * of course not*

He's a loon and a tool so he won't read it.

Interesting point about the House of Saud. I don't think it would be terribly hard for ISIS or ISIS sympathizers to infiltrate them and blow some princes up and get things started.

I'll guarantee the thought's occurred to them.
 
He's a loon and a tool so he won't read it.

Interesting point about the House of Saud. I don't think it would be terribly hard for ISIS or ISIS sympathizers to infiltrate them and blow some princes up and get things started.

I'll guarantee the thought's occurred to them.

LMFAO.
You are now dumbest member of JPP.
Even Nova is smarter.

You think our NSA is invassive?
You know NOTHING about Saudi Arabia.
Idiot
 
Unreal.
No, the FBI invetigation is real.
Muckraking is what your anti Hillary threads are. You don't get to redefine words to suit you.

Yes I read the statement.
No criminal intent, ie no charges.
I know you don't understand but without criminal intent there is no crime ie with criminal intent a homicide is murder, without it is
Manslaughter.
Intent is very importantin criminal procedings.

ISIS is in no way shape or form an existential threat to us. This is classic fear peddling also known as beating the drums of war. You excel at this.

As to the house of cards YOU said it.
No Saudi Arabia is not as vulnerable as any other MEcountry suggest you research some before you continue this tact, you couldn't be more incorrect.
complete wrong regarding "intent" once AGAIN READING iS FUNDAMENTAL!
All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct;
apparently the "vast quantities" threshold was not met ( for indictment) for the gross negligence criteria.
To be clear - gross negligence does NOT REQUIRE INTENT.
The rest of your blathering about "intent is very important blah blah is superfluous worthlessness i.e. your typical 'reasoning'.
++
You are now 100% truly insane to say ISIS is not an existential threat -do you comprehend what ISIS uses to justify it's existence?
Why it's "terrorism" is embraced by jihadists worldwide?? WTF is ISIS's endgame but an apocalypse??
Left unchecked how long would it take to aquire the caliphate? It's got presences all over the ME -not just Iraq and Syria
and Libya, and Somalia, and Nigeria,and Pakistan and India, and Afghanistan..Yemen..now Saudi Arabia..
++
Nobody claimed SA was "as vulnerable" now - the claim was keep digging at it and it can be..it'shas much more vulnerabilities
then just counting how many Princes there are in how many posts.
It has a potential to drop as fast as anyplace given the enabling circumstances.
Once again you cannot connect dots. You can see a static situation on a good day ( rare) but you cannot see how factors interrelate.
and because you are so freaking dense - you miss concepts.
 
He's a loon and a tool so he won't read it.

Interesting point about the House of Saud. I don't think it would be terribly hard for ISIS or ISIS sympathizers to infiltrate them and blow some princes up and get things started.

I'll guarantee the thought's occurred to them.
It's not so much as infiltration -it's turning the populace against the monarchy.
SA has a mixture of young 'liberals' (who obviously want more freedom) and older Wahhabists who see any reform as damning.
Then you add extreme religious fervor that ISIS brings to the situation -coupled with a tanking economy ( oil revenues)
and Shi'a unrest from the east....
 
It's not so much as infiltration -it's turning the populace against the monarchy.
SA has a mixture of young 'liberals' (who obviously want more freedom) and older Wahhabists who see any reform as damning.
Then you add extreme religious fervor that ISIS brings to the situation -coupled with a tanking economy ( oil revenues)
and Shi'a unrest from the east....

You'd have to be a special breed of idiot to think they are invincible lol.

But idiocy abounds.
 
Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail,participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
there are all kinds of stuff in the Comey Statement like this -yet no recommendation??
Clinton of course denied all this ever happened.
 
complete wrong regarding "intent" once AGAIN READING iS FUNDAMENTAL!
apparently the "vast quantities" threshold was not met ( for indictment) for the gross negligence criteria.
To be clear - gross negligence does NOT REQUIRE INTENT.
The rest of your blathering about "intent is very important blah blah is superfluous worthlessness i.e. your typical 'reasoning'.
++
You are now 100% truly insane to say ISIS is not an existential threat -do you comprehend what ISIS uses to justify it's existence?
Why it's "terrorism" is embraced by jihadists worldwide?? WTF is ISIS's endgame but an apocalypse??
Left unchecked how long would it take to aquire the caliphate? It's got presences all over the ME -not just Iraq and Syria
and Libya, and Somalia, and Nigeria,and Pakistan and India, and Afghanistan..Yemen..now Saudi Arabia..
++
Nobody claimed SA was "as vulnerable" now - the claim was keep digging at it and it can be..it'shas much more vulnerabilities
then just counting how many Princes there are in how many posts.
It has a potential to drop as fast as anyplace given the enabling circumstances.
Once again you cannot connect dots. You can see a static situation on a good day ( rare) but you cannot see how factors interrelate.
and because you are so freaking dense - you miss concepts.

Lie upon lie upon idiotic ignorance
It isn't my "reasoning you blithering retard,it is based on centuries of common law and should be public knowledge, so much so that it is ndicative of your general ignorance.
The rest of your post is just childish bullshit.
 
complete wrong regarding "intent" once AGAIN READING iS FUNDAMENTAL!
apparently the "vast quantities" threshold was not met ( for indictment) for the gross negligence criteria.
To be clear - gross negligence does NOT REQUIRE INTENT.
The rest of your blathering about "intent is very important blah blah is superfluous worthlessness i.e. your typical 'reasoning'.
++
You are now 100% truly insane to say ISIS is not an existential threat -do you comprehend what ISIS uses to justify it's existence?
Why it's "terrorism" is embraced by jihadists worldwide?? WTF is ISIS's endgame but an apocalypse??
Left unchecked how long would it take to aquire the caliphate? It's got presences all over the ME -not just Iraq and Syria
and Libya, and Somalia, and Nigeria,and Pakistan and India, and Afghanistan..Yemen..now Saudi Arabia..
++
Nobody claimed SA was "as vulnerable" now - the claim was keep digging at it and it can be..it'shas much more vulnerabilities
then just counting how many Princes there are in how many posts.
It has a potential to drop as fast as anyplace given the enabling circumstances.
Once again you cannot connect dots. You can see a static situation on a good day ( rare) but you cannot see how factors interrelate.
and because you are so freaking dense - you miss concepts.

Lie upon lie upon idiotic ignorance
It isn't my "reasoning you blithering retard,it is based on centuries of common law and should be public knowledge, so much so that it is ndicative of your general ignorance.
The rest of your post is just childish bullshit.
 
Lie upon lie upon idiotic ignorance
It isn't my "reasoning you blithering retard,it is based on centuries of common law and should be public knowledge, so much so that it is ndicative of your general ignorance.
The rest of your post is just childish bullshit.
you claim you read Comey's Statement..it even lays it out for you " or vast quantities" -not requiring intent....you got nothing..
 
you claim you read Comey's Statement..it even lays it out for you " or vast quantities" -not requiring intent....you got nothing..

I think you'll find that it's you Trumptards who got nothing.


tumblr_inline_ntndc0F1P11tv36fq_500.gif
 
I think you'll find that it's you Trumptards who got nothing.
can you explain why "gross negligence" ( which does not require intent") isn't at play here? The only other phrase I can find is "vast quantities "
maybe that threshold wasn't met?
 
This dude Sally Kohn of CNN just tweeted:

Sally Kohn ‏@sallykohn · 26m26 minutes ago

Sally Kohn Retweeted Jerry the Bastage

Uh, actually FBI not prosecuting *literally* means there wasn't evidence of illegal wrongdoing!!!!


Uh, the FBI said she broke the law but they still aren't prosecuting. How did this dude get on a national news station and be this ignorant?

Where did they say she broke the law? WOW, you are willing to spit out any shit today arnt you?
 
Back
Top