FBI Director Patel: We Know Who's Bankrolling Antifa, and We're Coming for Them

[Into the Night]

Just to repost:

Just to repeat your lie.

 

[Into the Night]

Which for some reason trump's lawyers cannot prove?

Prove what? Void argument fallacy. Do you even know what you are talking about, Wally?

 

[Into the Night]

Walt said it so it has to be true even though he can't provide a credible link.

No link is a proof. His source was just Democrat propaganda quoting made up numbers again.

 

[Into the Night]

Anyone who is decent should be happy that DOJ needs to have evidence.

Evidence for what, Sybil? What are you talking about?

 

[Into the Night]

As do MAGA.

True Americans shrug off politics to do what is best for the country.

True Scotsman fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Libs and cons do it all the time. MAGA and alt right rarely do.

Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your problems on Trump.

 

[Into the Night]

Any American man who hides behind a sock is equivalent to a married man who pays strangers to suck their cock.

Not all the time, of course. Just every once in awhile since that's the lie all MAGAts choose to live. Weird.

You can't blame your socks on anybody else, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Extremists always do, left or right. Do you agree? Fair chance.

I like people who favor justice and fairness, not abuse and domination.

Lie. You advocate violence. You support organized crime, rioting, looting, arson, and civil war. DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS, SYBIL!

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Just to repeat your lie.

What did your mom say about the question?

 

[Walt]

I already proved it... But I will repeat the post a second time(three times posting the same post, because apparently you have trouble reading).

OK

Last year, nationally, only 0.2% of federal criminal cases resulted in an acquittal. Federal prosecutors do not usually take on cases they cannot win, he says.

That policy seems to have changed. In the past six months not a single federal prosecution of a protester nationally has resulted in a conviction. Some have been thrown out by grand juries, which used to be almost unheard of. When people are prosecuted for complaining about the government, it seems jurors have some questions of their own. ■

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2026/02/05/federal-prosecutors-in-minnesota-are-cracking-down-on-dissent

In the end we all have to decide whether we will believe real statistics from a reputable source, or the "feelings" of the alt right posters.

 

[Walt]

Walt said it so it has to be true even though he can't provide a credible link.

So you need me to provide a credible link four times? You must have real trouble reading.

OK

Last year, nationally, only 0.2% of federal criminal cases resulted in an acquittal. Federal prosecutors do not usually take on cases they cannot win, he says.

That policy seems to have changed. In the past six months not a single federal prosecution of a protester nationally has resulted in a conviction. Some have been thrown out by grand juries, which used to be almost unheard of. When people are prosecuted for complaining about the government, it seems jurors have some questions of their own. ■

https://www.economist.com/united-states/2026/02/05/federal-prosecutors-in-minnesota-are-cracking-down-on-dissent

 

[Walt]

Appears Democrats are very happy with this.

The actual courts still stand. That is part of the American system still working. How much longer is anyone's guess.

 

[Walt]

No link is a proof. His source was just Democrat propaganda quoting made up numbers again.

The Economist is a British conservative magazine. It is nearly 200 years old.

 

[Walt]

Prove what? Void argument fallacy. Do you even know what you are talking about, Wally?

You say there is proof of "criminal activity", but cannot present the proof in court?

 

[evince]

What 'Epstein File', Sybil?? You are still hallucinating.

Poly is a racist cracker

 

[evince]

Appears Democrats are very happy with this.

Republicans are doing it ass face

 

[Phantasmal]

is this the same Kash Patel who claimed he had looked at the Epstein files, before any of this current information was forced out, and he lied to us at every stage trying to protect the wealthy men and ensure there was no accountability?

That Kash Patel??

Kash Patel, whose living the high life on the tax payers dime!

 

[Into the Night]

I already proved it... But I will repeat the post a second time(three times posting the same post, because apparently you have trouble reading).



In the end we all have to decide whether we will believe real statistics from a reputable source, or the "feelings" of the alt right posters.

Attempted proof by void. True Scotsman fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

So you need me to provide a credible link four times? You must have real trouble reading.

Repetition fallacy. False authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

The actual courts still stand. That is part of the American system still working. How much longer is anyone's guess.

Void argument fallacy. What are you talking about, Wally?