FBI found sensitive documents lying in unsecured places

why you fucksticks have to continue on with the whole 'everyone is a trumper' bullshit is beyond me........but the events of 1/6 should have told you something, but apparently you're too fucking stupid to recognize it. There are some crazy fuckers out there who only need a small push to start shooting for trump............but you go on thinking it's ok, you'll regret it.

Be honest; had Trump won the day on 1/6 eventually his own WSE Praetorian Guard would have thrown him off the roof of the White House, amirite? LOL
 
you've been 'misunderstanding' most all of my posts............not sure if it's because you're shit stupid or trolling

Sure, it's all my fault. :laugh:

If you were correct, then why did I keep asking you so many questions about your WSE ideology, support for the violent overthrow of the United States government and your justifying the mass murder of Americans because they worked for the government?

There's literally dozens of these posts from you justifying your desires. You are free to correct me where I am wrong.
 
why you fucksticks have to continue on with the whole 'everyone is a trumper' bullshit is beyond me........but the events of 1/6 should have told you something, but apparently you're too fucking stupid to recognize it. There are some crazy fuckers out there who only need a small push to start shooting for trump............but you go on thinking it's ok, you'll regret it.

Oh dammit. I dropped my RavingLunatic-to-English translator in the toilet, again. Maybe later.
 
that's cool. I can drop you in the same troll toilet that dutch is in...........you'll get an education in reality soon. trust me.

7vCksP3.gif
 
Earlier this year, federal law enforcement officials asked former President Donald Trump to better secure the storage room at his Mar-a-Lago resort where he was keeping presidential records -- and his staff complied by putting a padlock on the storage room door.

However, the Wall Street Journal reports that when FBI agents searched the resort earlier this month, they found national security documents outside of the designated area that Trump said he had secured.

Specifically, writes the Journal, agents "found highly sensitive and classified documents lying in unsecure places outside the storage room."

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-documents-mar-a-lago-2657903332/

Butbutbutbut he was just keeping them safe, he told us!

Trump is going to prison for this

Republicans will kill people because trump is indicted

sensitive places?......a lib'rul's ass?......

Agreed on both points.

6rdzq9.jpg

Why didn't Trump prosecute her? He had a revolving door of AGs looking for Yes Men. WTF happened? Yes, Hillary should have at least been censored for her actions, if not prosecuted.

How does that justify Trump keeping our nation's top secrets in a storeroom accessible by several people?

Like even staunch Republicans are saying now. twump is a clear and present danger to the security of the United States of America.

Hahahaha! Yeah, right. #TRE45ON does not listen to advice because in what passes for his mind, HE is the smartest one of all, smarter than doctors, generals, career pols, other "businessmen," etc. Nope, that's not why he didn't prosecute Hillary. He didn't because even his loyal lapdog Attorneys General had no prosecutorial legs to stand on. Clinton did not remove classified material to her personal residence where it could be accessed by anyone. She did not refuse to return classified material in her (illegal) possession. She did not keep classified material -- or any other documents rightfully belonging to the United States -- once she left office.

Your #MalignantMussolini is going down on this one. Charges will be filed between election day and the end of the year, IMO.





where did I justify that?
[/QUOTE]

I am curious what paper documents Hillary had that were marked "Top Secret." Can you provide a link showing where that was ever shown to be true?
The fact of the matter is not a single electronic document Hillary had was marked "Top Secret" at the time it was on her server. Information in the emails was later deemed to be classified but the documents themselves were not clearly marked when she had them. If you don't see the difference between a paper document that clearly is marked "Top Secret" and an electronic document that has no markings then you must be a complete moron.

Can't "ignore" what hasn't been seen. As much as you believe so, I seldom read your posts. What about your dogs?

Bad news for corrupt FBI agents and those who wish harm:

https://clintonfoundationtimeline.com/february-14-2017-mar-a-lago-has-a-scif/

 

Sean Spicer

30th White House Press Secretary
In office
January 20, 2017 – July 21, 2017
President Donald Trump
Deputy Sarah Sanders
Preceded by Josh Earnest
Succeeded by Sarah Sanders


Congratulations. You discovered that there was a SCIF in 2017. Something that no one has denied. It has no bearing on 2021 or 2022.

A SCIF was established at Mar-a-Lago, but it operated as a secure facility only during the Trump presidency
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...mar-a-lago-files-spell-out-jeopardy-for-trump
 
Why didn't Trump prosecute her? He had a revolving door of AGs looking for Yes Men. WTF happened? Yes, Hillary should have at least been censored for her actions, if not prosecuted.

How does that justify Trump keeping our nation's top secrets in a storeroom accessible by several people?

Can Congress censure somebody no longer in office?
 
Can Congress censure somebody no longer in office?

IDK. In Hillary's case, it should have been done as soon as the FBI investigation revealed that she'd lied about having classified material on her server.
 
Do you think classified material violations should prevent a person from running for national office?

It cannot be a requirement but it is probably a political disqualification.

A classified document could be a minor issue but it could be very serious. Seems like Hillary included a newspaper article about drones which was a still classified topic but obviously not too secret if it was in the newspaper.
 
It cannot be a requirement but it is probably a political disqualification.

A classified document could be a minor issue but it could be very serious. Seems like Hillary included a newspaper article about drones which was a still classified topic but obviously not too secret if it was in the newspaper.

Anyone who has ever handled classified material should know that just because it's in the paper doesn't mean it's declassified. Both Hillary and Trump knew better then did it anyway.
 
Anyone who has ever handled classified material should know that just because it's in the paper doesn't mean it's declassified. Both Hillary and Trump knew better then did it anyway.

Yes, they should know but I don't think anybody is going to consider that a serious threat to national security. Trump's biggest risk is those documents revealing human assets.
 
Yes, they should know but I don't think anybody is going to consider that a serious threat to national security. Trump's biggest risk is those documents revealing human assets.

It's a violation of classified material protocols, as Comey pointed out during his testimony. Hillary didn't even get a wrist slap. Now look at where we are with Trump and the arguments being made in his defense vis-à-vis Hillary.

This is akin to the Broken Window theory, where a society that repeatedly lets small crimes slide will end up letting big crimes slide. It's not good for the nation.

On a related note, once we started electing lying, draft-dodging adulterers in 1992 then look what happened in 2016.

IMO, our nation needs to hold our leaders to a higher standard because what we're doing now isn't working.

6k6asf.jpg
 
Back
Top