Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional

No, it would take all the states to enact similar laws and then about 20-30 yrs time. People were making your stupid comment 40 yrs ago and if this happenned then it most certainly would be making a difference by now.

Wrong too. People commit crimes not tools. A firearm is a tool. Then there's technology... You can 3D print a magazine for a gun today at home. If you don't plan on using it for years, it doesn't even have to be very reusable. So, limiting magazines to 10 rounds or less is simply asinine. It assumes people are too stupid to just go around that if they want.

If you are so inclined, a small mill and a lathe are all you need to make your own firearm from scratch.

We need to focus on the people doing these crimes and figure the fuck out how to get them where they can't or won't do them, not on taking away their 'toys.'
 
your opinion of what constitutes 'psychotic' is just an opinion......and a wrong one. We all know that you're a statist, preferring to have a 'benevolent' overlord than to enjoy freedom and liberty, so your opinion isn't even worth a grain of salt

Indeed, an ancient who is a nutter.
 
You forget the 1st confederacy.

Despite the British, you could carry any gun you wanted. The British hated it, of course, but they could not stop it. Why do you think the Battle of Lexington happened? What were the British trying to do there? Why did they lose that battle?

The right of self defense is inherent, you see. No government in the world can prevent it.

The Confederacy was in violation of British Law - and the Brits reacted by sending troops to disarm the public. Very much like the democrats today. Where we as Americans fail is in that democrats are not dealt with in the same way the British were dealt with at that time.
 
Nope. Most colonists did not live in cities; gun ownership was common generally and often considered necessary protection against Indians as well as for militia activity against Indians.

Tell that to the colonists in Lexington, VA.

Tyranny depends on a disarmed, subservient populace. The British knew this well.
 
Do a 10 year test run where you mandate that every single federal, state, and municipality law enforcement officer be restricted to 10 round mags.................if THEN they think it's a good idea, maybe we'll try it for civilians
 
I'm confident that the thugs in Oregon will obey these new gun laws.

Wait...they are thugs...

Everyone on every side knows this law is patently unconstitutional. That an Obama judge upheld it just shows the contempt the left has for the Constitution. The appeal will very likely see it thrown out - even the 9th won't support such a blatant attack on Constitutional law.
 
1. I inherited property.

2. Europe has tough immigration laws.

3. My obligation as an American citizen who has stayed
is to try to improve America, not pretend that it's perfect when it's fucked up..

Any other stupid questions, my esteemed Vanderbilt graduate?

Wouldn't North Korea be a better choice for you than Europe, given your political views?
 
No, it would take all the states to enact similar laws and then about 20-30 yrs time. People were making your stupid comment 40 yrs ago and if this happenned then it most certainly would be making a difference by now.

Certainly.

For one thing, we wouldn't be talking about the two party system anymore, as we would have one party rule. Without and armed populace to keep democrat fascism at bay, America would be a cross between North Korea and California. The majority impoverished with a 30% apparatchik class serving an tiny 0.01% ruling caste.

But you can't impose your vision on armed victims.
 
Nope. Most colonists did not live in cities; gun ownership was common generally and often considered necessary protection against Indians as well as for militia activity against Indians.

City or country. The war was the same. Why do you think the battle of Lexington happened? Why do you think the Boston Tea Party happened? You think these are somehow not related?????!?
The indians fought against the British too. Didn't you know that?
 
If you are in the military you can have a machine gun and a howitzer too but as a citizen you can't have them. the 2nd amendment right to bear arms does not include ALL arms. You can't have nuclear weapons either.


In the vernacular of the 18th century, "Arms" were man carriable. One cannot "bear" a nuclear weapon. This is just a strawman advocates of tyranny - the Marxist/fascist democrats - employ in their quest to disarm their intended victims.
 
1. I inherited property.
You mean you want to retain the property you inherited, as protected by the document you despise.
2. Europe has tough immigration laws.
You mean you want to travel freely, as protected by the document you despise.
3. My obligation as an American citizen who has stayed
is to try to improve America, not pretend that it's perfect when it's fucked up..
You mean you want to live in a nation of laws and not a nation ruled by tyrants, protected by the document you despise.
Any other stupid questions, my esteemed Vanderbilt graduate?
You've already answered them.

You are a selfish unthinking ingrate that hates the very document that protects private property, your ability to travel, and IS the very core of what makes the United States unique among nations.
 
I agree America is near to being a banana republic since Biden assumed the presidency.

You can sell your property and emigrate to Europe. Many Americans have. Socialists are welcomed there.

Improving America would be an exploit accompli if you left.

It has been said that America's most important export is the U.S. Constitution. This is because the principles laid out in the text have been replicated by every major (and many minor) democratic countries. Without the principles of the Constitution, the principles of a free society would be impossible.

James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay, were they alive today, would disagree with your stupid, Mal-informed assessment of the US Constitution.

Perhaps the Constitution of China, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela or the Russian Federation would be a better match for you.

Heh. These nations have no constitution!
 
Back
Top