Federal judges are headed into a constitutional crisis

You know this how? Walter?
He doesn't know and he lies a lot.

Expedited removal, also known as expedited deportation, is a process where certain non-citizens can be deported without an immigration court hearing, typically for those who lack proper entry documents or entered through fraud.
 
On top of the federal judge that is demanding a stop to deportation of cartel members, gangsters, and terrorists, now another radical Leftist judge in Baltimore is demanding Trump rehire, restaff, and start all functions of USAID back up claiming his actions were "unconstitutional"--without citation to anything in the constitution of course...



It's overtime. The American people are tired of being ruled by a Judicial Dictatorship.
 
On top of the federal judge that is demanding a stop to deportation of cartel members, gangsters, and terrorists, now another radical Leftist judge in Baltimore is demanding Trump rehire, restaff, and start all functions of USAID back up claiming his actions were "unconstitutional"--without citation to anything in the constitution of course...




It's amusing that you #TRE45ONv2.0 Cult members think that upholding the law is "unconstitutional." You truly do want a despotic fascist dictator rather than a president. Anyone who issues orders to stop unlawful actions is "a radical leftist" judge. What is wrong with you?
 
It's amusing that you #TRE45ONv2.0 Cult members think that upholding the law is "unconstitutional." You truly do want a despotic fascist dictator rather than a president. Anyone who issues orders to stop unlawful actions is "a radical leftist" judge. What is wrong with you?


AI Overview
Learn more

In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review decisions by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke previously approved visa petitions, as these revocations are considered discretionary agency actions and therefore not subject to judicial review.
 
What the judge is asking for is evidence of these claims. For all we know these deporties are law abiding US citizens.
Exactly. It's Due Process as stated in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. I'm fine with flying violent criminals halfway across the Gulf of America and releasing them, but the Constitution requires due process to make sure they are really violent criminals and not just people the DOGE doesn't like.

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
 
AI Overview
Learn more

In a recent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Bouarfa v. Mayorkas that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review decisions by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke previously approved visa petitions, as these revocations are considered discretionary agency actions and therefore not subject to judicial review.
Will you be remembering this when it's a Democrat President doing it to Nazis, be they American or Canadian, vols?

7f0p9y.jpg
 
Back
Top