Filthy lying bastards

If you read and believe what the Federalist publishes, then you're the greatest fool.

Anyone with critical thinking skills can glean facts from any source....or state unequivocally that no facts exist in the source.

The link does have facts, but it's the spin that makes them lies.

Example; masks didn't change just because Trump because President but that's what the fucking morons just like they now hate cops and the military.
 
The miserable evil fucks should be brought up on charges of crimes against humanity

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/1...ars-of-lies-did-they-think-we-wouldnt-notice/

Are you suggesting the assistant editors at the Federalist should be charged?

It amazes me how you are unable to comprehend the meaning of this statement -
getting the jab makes people “much less likely to be infected therefore much less likely to spread the virus.”

Can you explain how in your mind that statement guarantees that someone that gets the jab will not get infected?

If being less likely to get infected means one can't get infected, does that mean that more likely to die means someone will for sure die?
 
Anyone with critical thinking skills can glean facts from any source....or state unequivocally that no facts exist in the source.

The link does have facts, but it's the spin that makes them lies.

Example; masks didn't change just because Trump because President but that's what the fucking morons just like they now hate cops and the military.

Distorting facts is these right wing publication's forte.
 
That's putting it bluntly

I do my best to be as honest and forthright as possible.

To be fair, I also think he has issues that preclude him from being responsible for himself.

BTW, Trump lied. Walls don't work.

4thlz0.jpg
 
Anyone with critical thinking skills can glean facts from any source....or state unequivocally that no facts exist in the source.

The link does have facts, but it's the spin that makes them lies.

Example; masks didn't change just because Trump because President but that's what the fucking morons just like they now hate cops and the military.

Why do we bother when we can go to a better source?

Do you go to a church library or a public library? Why or why not? Both contain facts.
 
Distorting facts is these right wing publication's forte.

My most honest reply is that they learned that from the Democrats. Seriously.

The Republicans use to be the party of reason; national defense and a strong economy that was good for all Americans. The Democrats were the party of emotion; the bleeding hearts. The party that wants to mother everyone.

Now the Republicans are also a party of emotion, no longer logical. The bad news is that their emotion is perpetual anger. Hate. A desire to tear everything down and take what they can from the wreckage.

This isn't a new thing. Trump just bumped it up a level with the support of the same assholes who have been pushing for it since the 1992 election.
 
Why do we bother when we can go to a better source?

Do you go to a church library or a public library? Why or why not? Both contain facts.

Why limit yourself? Any intelligent person skilled in critical thinking can go to either or, preferably both. Glean whatever information they can and then draw their own conclusions.

Which is the better, unbiased source? Maybe the public library. It depends if the town canceled Huckleberry Finn and the Catcher in the Rye or not and the Church library didn't.

Cancel Culture is an attitude, not a system of truth, justice or the American way.
 
Why limit yourself? Any intelligent person skilled in critical thinking can go to either or, preferably both. Glean whatever information they can and then draw their own conclusions.

Which is the better, unbiased source? Maybe the public library. It depends if the town canceled Huckleberry Finn and the Catcher in the Rye or not and the Church library didn't.

Cancel Culture is an attitude, not a system of truth, justice or the American way.

Well if I was a fact-checker, I would go to the worst of the worst sources then rate them on my own website. Make good buck. ;)
 
Well if I was a fact-checker, I would go to the worst of the worst sources then rate them on my own website. Make good buck. ;)

A better business model, IMO, is rate both the good and the bad...but that depends upon the subject too and the specific library in question since they are not all the same. They vary by state and municipality. Remember when Boston was famous for banning books? They still have that attitude and inject it into the Democratic party just like the Evangelicals are injecting hate against gays, non-whites and non-Evangelicals into the Republican party.

Which library is better? Trump's Presidential Library and Casino or Reagan's? It depends on the topic and the available materials. On the topic of research. Truth is everywhere. Sometimes it's easier to find in some places than in others, but truth is wherever we find it. It's not an opinion.

IMO, there are universal truths, but those truths are physical. Once we start discussing spiritual truths and morality, then it all goes completely relative and arbitrary.

3hf6sl.jpg
 
Either the whole world is lying about Covid-19, or the alt right has failed on every level... Which could it be?
 
Back
Top