PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
really?....why didn't Schiff have them testify?......
First DemmyDefector......
- Thread starter PostmodernProphet
- Start date
really?....why didn't Schiff have them testify?......
Yes, he urged impeachment when he was a red. He has to win as an independent to be able to vote against the thief in chief. There are many Repugs who are not running again. They do not want to be forced to defend Trump's corruption and lack of governance abilities. Here are more who Trump's stupidity and corruption have driven out of the party. https://www.newsweek.com/republicans-who-left-gop-because-trump-1447767 What they have in common is they are smart and care about the country. You cannot be critical of Trump.
Trump prohibited them from testifying. As an example, McGahan just lost in court and he has to testify. But every one of them will require a court case thanks to Trump trying to disrupt the courts. You are OK with all those insiders not answering subpoenas.If it were Dems doing that, you would want them lynched. Perhaps you are unable to understand what a poor position concerning the law and ethics you back?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
so you are assuming that Nancy won't call for a vote before November, 2020?....if so, don't count on him as he hasn't got a prayer as an independent in that district....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
what they don't have in common with Amash, is none of them are in Congress and none of them can vote for impeachment........sure I can be critical of Trump......he hasn't been nearly as abusive to demmycrats as he could have been.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
did any of them get subpoenas to hearing AFTER they ended the NancyDance and voted to begin an actual investigation.......I seem to recall Adam Schiftless only wanted them to testify in secret so he could screen what the press could hear......
There was never any testifying in secret. There were Repubs in every single one of them. It was not done on CSPAN. That does not make it secret. You are being dishonest again.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
bullshit.....dishonest is when demmycunts hold closed door meetings then release details which turn out to be false later........NancyDancing and Shiftless Parodies......
Are you really operating without information? You should expand your reading. The fact is the original hearings had up to 45 Republicans in them. They had the power to interview the witnesses. It was never a secret. I know, now rightys can redefine what secret means. They moved to open hearings soon after they started. But they were never secret.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
closed door......closed mind......
In your case no mind. The evidence does not mean a thing to you. There were reds in every single hearing. The Repubs knew exactly what was said and done. You call that secret. How damn dumb is that?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
your imagination is not admissible in a court of law......
Are you claiming the Repubs were not in the hearings? Are you really?
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
of course they were there......they asked the questions which showed your witnesses just made up "facts" instead of witnessed them......
How would you know that if they were secret? it is also wrong. Trump has done a lot that deserves impeachment. he breaks laws for a workout routine.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
if he's done something wrong, why haven't you brought any evidence of it?......
Still wrong. The repubs were in every session and they released their takes from them. why can you not learn when you are wrong and recant? Stubbornness while being wrong as you are, is not a virtue.