PostmodernProphet, (1) Once a single January 6th rioter is convicted for sedition,* we've established the federal court's determination that the besieging of the Capitol Building were seditious crimes;thanks for admitting you haven't got a chance in hell of convicting Trump for sedition......
(2) There's videos of Trump's speech within which he urged the crowd to go to the Capitol building and to the Senate;
(3) What's left is to prove Trump knew, or had good reason to know*and believe there were substantial numbers of people in the crowd who were*armed and/or in any manner likely to grievously behave violently.
Someone I correspond with wrote, "Mark Meadows aid and other have testified Trump was told the rioters were armed by the Secret Service. Those aides allege Trump replied “they’re not here to hurt me, let them in (to the protest event prior to the riot)”. He was unperturbed by the possibility of armed riots bc he wasn’t the target".
I'd bet in favor of the Department of Justice's lawyers who filed the first 11 indictments for seditious crimes against the United States committed on January 6, 2021. They wouldn't bring the case to court if they didn't believe they' could convince a jury of the 11's guilt.
There' apparently a good case to be made against ex-president Donald Trump. If the Department of Justice ever files charges against Trump, I believe they would be reasonably confident that they could convince a jury of Trump's guilt. I wouldn't bet against the Justice Department if they ever indict Trump. Respectfully, Supposn
Last edited: