First "they don't exist" then this? Which is it I'minajihad?

Mormonism also advocates a theocratic government system based on their faith. Do we ban them too?

Christian sects have openly declared their hostility to the concept of separation of Church & State. Do we ban them as well?
 
But a religion opposed to separation of church and state, is inherently antithetical to american values.
//

You talking about Christians there Asshat ?
 
Warren said:
Mormonism also advocates a theocratic government system based on their faith. Do we ban them too?
Click to expand...

If they start bombing shit, yeah.

Christian sects have openly declared their hostility to the concept of separation of Church & State. Do we ban them as well?
Click to expand...


If they start bombing shit, yeah.
 
uscitizen said:
Some Christians teach terrorism some Ilamics tesach terrorism.

Terrorism by traditional terrorist weapons or by invading and occupying a country , all the same terrorism.
Click to expand...


You must analyze the percentage of each population doing each to get a real picture.

And our terrorism there is not based on christianity, but on globalism and the nation building philosophies which stem from that.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But still, you and your ilk only attack the homophobia of white christians. Hence the anti-western bias shows. You guys are the perfectly created enemy within. Your soft mushy brains are programmed to hate your own culture and selves.
Click to expand...
First off the fact that Iraq executes and maybe even tortures gays is barbaric. But it is not a reason to attack them. There are other things we can do to show our displeasure at this. The homophobia of white christians in MY COUNTRY is my concern. The fact that homophobes want to deny queers the same rights that breeders have bothers me. The fact that a queer can be fired from a job just because she is queer bothers me. But you want to turn my opposition to this stupid war in Iraq as some sort of endorsement of Iranian barbarism. Am I outraged? YOu bet your ass, but no more so than I am that my queer friends can be kept from seeing their partners in the hospital because a family member says so and a breeder does not suffer the same injustice because they can marry the person they love. That they can be kept from inheriting property purchased by the couple when heterosexuals can get married and inherit with or without a will solely because homophobic bigotry keeps them from getting married. But so far the homophobes have failed at coming up with a homeland security reason for arresting queers and holding them without charges and keeping them from using Habeas Corpus. Your outrage is sorely misplaced.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You must analyze the percentage of each population doing each to get a real picture.

And our terrorism there is not based on christianity, but on globalism and the nation building philosophies which stem from that.
Click to expand...

Hey dude our Christianity allows us to be used very effectively against those who believe differently. ie Islam....
 
uscitizen said:
Hey dude our Christianity allows us to be used very effectively against those who believe differently. ie Islam....
Click to expand...

hey dude, It's about theocracy versus freedom. Our society, loosely christian, values freedom. There is no christian theocracy in existence. They are all about theocracy.


You need to be fairhanded about criticisms of all cultures instead of pretending we're the worst people on earth. You may even feel better about yourself.
 
Say what...counselor?

Socrtease said:
First off the fact that Iraq(ya mean Iran?) executes and maybe even tortures gays is barbaric. But it is not a reason to attack them. There are other things we can do to show our displeasure at this. The homophobia of white christians in MY COUNTRY is my concern. The fact that homophobes want to deny queers the same rights that breeders have bothers me. The fact that a queer can be fired from a job just because she is queer bothers me. But you want to turn my opposition to this stupid war in Iraq as some sort of endorsement of Iranian barbarism. Am I outraged? YOu bet your ass, but no more so than I am that my queer friends can be kept from seeing their partners in the hospital because a family member says so and a breeder does not suffer the same injustice because they can marry the person they love. That they can be kept from inheriting property purchased by the couple when heterosexuals can get married and inherit with or without a will solely because homophobic bigotry keeps them from getting married. But so far the homophobes have failed at coming up with a homeland security reason for arresting queers and holding them without charges and keeping them from using Habeas Corpus. Your outrage is sorely misplaced.
Click to expand...



gays as well as straights can do a will...contract with anyone they chose!..They do not need the matrimony of marriage to accomplish this...shame on you counselor!


side note:did anyone see the hypocrisy in this...using the 'Queer' word...just food for thought!
 
Last edited:
Battleborne said:
gays as well as straights can do a will...contract with anyone they chose!..They do not need the matrimony of marriage to accomplish this...shame on you counselor!


side note:did anyone see the hypocrisy in this...using the 'Queer' word...just food for thought!
Click to expand...
But breeders don't HAVE to create a will to pass on property. They can get Married. Hospitals don't have to abide by contracts when they exclude same sex partners from hospital rooms at the demand of the family members. I am not saying that ANY church has to marry anyone. THere is no law that requires that now. The state endorses marriage through a license, they shouldn't but they do. IF they are going to endorse opposite sex marriages then they should endorse same sex marriages. There is no VALID reason not to. There is no requirement that people MUST be able to procreate to get married, else older woman could never marry once they go beyond menopause. Anyway, my comment was more that I would be no more willing to engage in military actions against IRAN (thanks for the correction) because of this than I would any other reason short of a direct threat against the US. Direct active threat. We lived with a nuclear (that's nucular for you repubs) USSR for 40 years we can live with a nuclear Iran.
 
Whatever counselor.............

Socrtease said:
But breeders don't HAVE to create a will to pass on property. They can get Married. Hospitals don't have to abide by contracts when they exclude same sex partners from hospital rooms at the demand of the family members. I am not saying that ANY church has to marry anyone. THere is no law that requires that now. The state endorses marriage through a license, they shouldn't but they do. IF they are going to endorse opposite sex marriages then they should endorse same sex marriages. There is no VALID reason not to. There is no requirement that people MUST be able to procreate to get married, else older woman could never marry once they go beyond menopause. Anyway, my comment was more that I would be no more willing to engage in military actions against IRAN (thanks for the correction) because of this than I would any other reason short of a direct threat against the US. Direct active threat. We lived with a nuclear (that's nucular for you repubs) USSR for 40 years we can live with a nuclear Iran.
Click to expand...



I give up...you are a lost cause...have a nice retirement...that is if we get there again!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top