Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

Nope. The deal was that hospitals and/or counties would be given more money based on the number of "COVID Deaths" ... which didn't mean that they had to have died from COVID, but they had to be dead.

No testing was required. Doctors and medical examiners were taken on their word ... for which they were given broad leeway to presume that the deceased had COVID at death, which was then termed a "COVID death" for which they would cash in on a bonus payment. Again, the death did not have be caused by COVID (because COVID doesn't kill), merely that the deceased was declared to have had COVID at the time of death, and that made it a COVID death and mo'-money mo'-money mo'-money!

Yes, it was a scam to get the highest numbers of "COVID Deaths" as possible so as to ... you guessed it ... inculcate abject panic.

d106bdc30999c4c30dd10cb8ebc49469.jpg


Nobody died from COVID. Exactly the same number of people died during the COVID hoax as did prior.

Covid can probably kill if you cancel the fever. Covid virus starts to melt at 37°c which isn't even a low grade fever. Whole truth is it's extremely stupid to cancel or reduce fevers. You should exacerbate fevers. Hot sugary coffee fuels a fever nicely but also have some vitamin c, capsicum, onions and chicken fats. My cold remedy is chicken heart tinola(extra onions) with a hot latte'. There's also some nice supplements that fuel inflammatory response. Stupid expensive.

The point is, covid can kill idiots and junky faggots.

Virus so deadly all you need is a hot bath to cure it.

If you can push your fever up to 39°c you can cook it out in a couple hours.

Lots of folks think ivermectin cures covid and it's because they stop taking ibuprofen once they start taking ivermectin.
 
A common occurrence. People come for different reasons. Some, especially the MAGAts, just come here to vent their spleens. Most are very unhappy with their lives and they are too weak and stupid to take responsibility for their own happiness.
I see that Lichgold responded to your post by calling those on the left 'salty fag****' in his response to your post. As for myself, I feel it's a tragedy that people on both sides treat each other so badly. I tend to alternate "sides", going right when it comes to things like covid and vaccines, going left when it comes to LGBTQ issues. I tend to stick to just one issue at a time to avoid the vertigo of having the same people who insult me in one thread be my allies in another.
What are the top five LGBTQ issues? I'm only aware of one.

What would that be? In any case, I decided to do a search for LGBTQ issues. I came up with battles instead:
 
I see that Lichgold responded to your post by calling those on the left 'salty fag****' in his response to your post. As for myself, I feel it's a tragedy that people on both sides treat each other so badly. I tend to alternate "sides", going right when it comes to things like covid and vaccines, going left when it comes to LGBTQ issues. I tend to stick to just one issue at a time to avoid the vertigo of having the same people who insult me in one thread be my allies in another :-p.
That would be common coming from a MAGAt. There's a few on the left who are just as extreme, but overall the demographic for MAGAts is elderly, lonely, misogynistic, racist Euro-American males. Most appear to be posting from a facility or living alone in their single-wide.

IMO, they are scared, feeble, ostracized from their own families and more than a little addled. I have over 40 of them on ignore, but it's not that difficult to understand what they posted by the responses of those not on ignore because it's always the same old shit like you quoted from Lick.
 
I think at this point you're just trolling IBD.
... or you could hazard an answer.

Why do you think contract killings are OK?

[ for purposes of discussion, a "contract killing" is defined as the killing of living human A by living human B who was paid by living human C for his "unaliving" services. Furthermore, living human A does not get a say in the matter, the killing fee is negotiated between humans B and C, and the entire matter is human C's choice. ]

I once had a young female friend who also liked to take control of language terms when it came to abortion. It ended in us being unable to discuss the subject anymore because she refused to accept dictionary definitions of the term. Will you accept either of the following terms for abortion which are used by the American Heritage Dictionary, 5th edition?

**
  • noun Induced termination of a pregnancy with destruction of the embryo or fetus.
  • noun Any of various procedures that result in the termination of a pregnancy.
**

Source:
 
Again from what I've read, it seems the general reason women who -do- get an abortion is for economic reasons.
Well, the unbrella reason women have for putting a hit out on their own children is "convenience." Less than 1% do so because the mother's life is somehow at risk.

I just pulled up an article on reasons why women have abortions. Convenience was not one of the reasons mentioned. From the article in question:
**

Financial circumstances

Around 40% of people mentioned a financial reason for needing an abortion. Most of them had general financial concerns or said they could not afford to support a child.
Around 4% said a lack of employment contributed to their decision, and 0.6% said they terminated their pregnancies because of a lack of insurance or government assistance.

Timing

More than one-third (36%) of study participants cited reasons relating to timing. Some felt they were not emotionally or financially ready to have a baby, while others felt they were too old to have a child.

Partner-related reasons

Almost one-third (31%) of study participants gave reasons relating to their partner.
For example, some said they did not have a good or stable relationship with their partner or that their partner was unsupportive. Around 8% wanted to get married before having children. Others mentioned that they had a partner who was abusive or who did not want the baby.

**

Source:
 
Back
Top