Florida plans to become first state to eliminate all childhood vaccine mandates

[Into the Night]

Roll em dice!

Roll em dice!

Roll them dice!

 

[AProudLefty]

Roll them dice!

Roll em dice!

 

[IBDaMann]

The first, more minor issue, is that I have some doubts as to whether your definition is totally normal.

Nope. You do not. You read it. You saw that it was totally straightforward ... and you immediately feared for your killing supremacy. If women are not allowed to kill living humans with impunity, something that would land me in jail, you will join them in screaming "VICTIMHOOD!".

That is what is going on here. You are clinging to your killing supremacy with a death-grip. Beyond that, you have absolutely no qualms with my definition.

For one, you seem to disagree with Wikipedia's definition of contract killings

Incorrect. This is a dishonest pivot on your part. I didn't disagree with any definition; I rejected Wikipedia outright for the nonauthoritative source that it is. I did make this perfectly clear.

Anyway, we don't need to buy time by quibbling over definitions because I gave you a perfectly good one for which you have no objections.

The second more important issue is that you jumped to the conclusion that I approve of contract killings. I never said that.

Sorry, you have no wiggle room. It is not merely my conclusion but a mathematical theorem. You approve of a subset of contract killings, ergo there are some contract killings of which you approve, and therefore you cannot claim to disapprove of the entire superset of contract killings.

If you can't follow the logic, that is your personal issue. As it stands now, you approve of contract killings. The day you disapprove of the superset of contract killings, you are going to have to reject all abortions. Again, you have no wiggle room.

 

[IBDaMann]

I thought you said you didn't mention abortion?

You thought this because you can't read, remember?

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope. You do not. You read it. You saw that it was totally straightforward ... and you immediately feared for your killing supremacy. If women are not allowed to kill living humans with impunity, something that would land me in jail, you will join them in screaming "VICTIMHOOD!".

That is what is going on here. You are clinging to your killing supremacy with a death-grip. Beyond that, you have absolutely no qualms with my definition.


Incorrect. This is a dishonest pivot on your part. I didn't disagree with any definition; I rejected Wikipedia outright for the nonauthoritative source that it is. I did make this perfectly clear.

Anyway, we don't need to buy time by quibbling over definitions because I gave you a perfectly good one for which you have no objections.


Sorry, you have no wiggle room. It is not merely my conclusion but a mathematical theorem. You approve of a subset of contract killings, ergo there are some contract killings of which you approve, and therefore you cannot claim to disapprove of the entire superset of contract killings.

If you can't follow the logic, that is your personal issue. As it stands now, you approve of contract killings. The day you disapprove of the superset of contract killings, you are going to have to reject all abortions. Again, you have no wiggle room.

And yet you said you made no mention of abortion.

Here you are talking about abortion.

 

[IBDaMann]

And yet you said you made no mention of abortion.

Here you are talking about abortion.

If only you could read, this would be so much easier.

 

[AProudLefty]

If only you could read, this would be so much easier.

Did you say you had not made any mention of abortion?

Your straw man of "contract killing" obviously was in reference to abortion.

"Contract killing" is murder and @Scott is not OK with it as you falsely claimed.

 

[IBDaMann]

Did you say you had not made any mention of abortion?

I did not.

Your straw man of "contract killing" obviously was in reference to abortion.

Nope. Contract Killing is the superset.

"Contract killing" is murder

If only you could read, you would have been able to see that "murder" was not part of the definition I presented. Reading is so very important.

 

[AProudLefty]

I did not.

So why talk about abortion now? Forgetting what you said?

Nope. Contract Killing is the superset.

Your silly copy and pasting and reference to math doesn't help.

Abortion is not a contract killing.

If only you could read, you would have been able to see that "murder" was not part of the definition I presented. Reading is so very important.

Then "contract killing" isn't murder? You contradicted yourself.

 

[IBDaMann]

So why talk about abortion now?

If you could read, you'd know that I wish to talk about "contract killing".

Abortion is not a contract killing.

Yes, that's exactly what being a proper subset means. If only you understood math you'd understand this. Man, your deaf studies really did a number on you.

 

[AProudLefty]

If you could read, you'd know that I wish to talk about "contract killing".

You did. And you have yet to provide examples of @Scott thinking it's OK.

Yes, that's exactly what being a proper subset means. If only you understood math you'd understand this. Man, your deaf studies really did a number on you.

All you did was copying and pasting without understanding.

 

[IBDaMann]

Your silly copy and pasting and reference to math doesn't help.

Abortion is not a contract killing.

Contradiction and Bad Math. You were deprived of an education. I feel sorry for you.

 

[AProudLefty]

Contradiction and Bad Math. You were deprived of an education. I feel sorry for you.

What contradiction and bad math? Are you seeing things that aren't there? I feel sorry for you.

 

[IBDaMann]

What contradiction and bad math?

You wouldn't have to ask if you actually understood math and logic.

 

[AProudLefty]

You wouldn't have to ask if you actually understood math and logic.

So you have no idea.

Sorry that your education has failed you.

 

[IBDaMann]

All you did was copying and pasting without understanding.

Poor grammar. You should have written: "All you did was copy-paste without understanding."

 

[IBDaMann]

So you have no idea.

Bad logic. If you had actually learned logic, you wouldn't be making one long chain of errors.

 

[AProudLefty]

Bad logic. If you had actually learned logic, you wouldn't be making one long chain of errors.

You're repeating yourself. Broken?

 

[AProudLefty]

Poor grammar. You should have written: "All you did was copy-paste without understanding."

Poor guy.

 

[Scott]

You know that the topic is "contract killing."

It wasn't originally.

It was the topic the moment I made it the topic by asking you about your support for contract killings.

As Lefty has pointed out to you a few times now, I never claimed to support contract killings. The fact that you believe this also hints at the fact that you know full well that the topic before you interjected wasn't contract killings, but abortions and that if I support abortions, I must support contract killings because, in your mind, abortions are a "proper subset" of contract killings. This is what -you- believe, but it's not what I believe. What I -do- support is a women's right to choose whether or not to carry her pregnancy to term.