Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
It beats the he** out buying fuel from the ME.
So does drilling in ANWAR and the Gulf.... and that way people get to eat.
It beats the he** out buying fuel from the ME.
And like usual Lori is clueless,
Wanna bet which way corn production is going you dumbass salesman???
Food AND fuel?!! Now you are just dreaming! We must sacrifice, humanity is bad and must hurt to save itself from... well... itself.So does drilling in ANWAR and the Gulf.... and that way people get to eat.
Am I the only one who sees this as a good step in riddign ourselves dependent on foreign oil? Even if ethanol proves to be just as effective, keeping (US) jobs and creatign a domestic dependency is still very good.
Seriously, are you still ashamed to state your college.
Signifiacantly higher prices especially in a simple industry like farming will always raise production. The shortages are temporary, investors see the lagging ag sector compared to oil and minerals and are making wise investments in ag going up. Guess where I'm investing next?
Or 3, bring back the small family farm.While I agree grain prices will continue to rise and thus Aggs are a good place to invest, you are kidding yourself if you think they can wave a magic wand and suddenly produce more grain..... especially given the fact that demand continues to skyrocket. We cannot keep pace unless we do one of two things in the short run....
1) Cut down forests so that we have more land to farm
2) Cease using grain for ethanol production.
An increase in supplies to offset what's being produced for fuel is all we need to do long term. Short term, I fully support my tax dollars going to give relief to the people in need.
I'm not well versed in alternative energy sources, so I have no opinion of synthetic alternatives or what the advantages or disadvantages will be. Honestly I'd feel more comfortable with just producing more food. We know that more food supplies will stop this. What's the hinderance in simply producing more?
Who knows what kind of nuclear sister people would come up with.
Or 3, bring back the small family farm.
switchgrass ethonal is the answer, but Iowa has the corn and the first primary.
freak you have a compulsive need to stand up for the economic illiterate.
Please don't embarass yourself further, I mention Iowa and corn and the early primary making your point useless.
Also, do not be foolish enough to bet me wheat production won't go way up following a huge increase in price.
freak you have a compulsive need to stand up for the economic illiterate.
Please don't embarass yourself further, I mention Iowa and corn and the early primary making your point useless.
Also, do not be foolish enough to bet me wheat production won't go way up following a huge increase in price.
dude we produce a fuel that's actually efficient, I know all about the waiste in ethanol.
Oncelor was trying to argue production wouldn't go up with price.
Not sure China is out of farmland, they have way more land unoccupied than they have lived in. They are pretty smart and will figure out how to increase production.
How much grain is used to feed cattle as compared to how much grain is used in ethanol production? What is the energy return on each? General environmental impact of each?
Further, given the biofuels actually serve to compliment fossil fuels that are key to food production, what is the positive impact of biofuels on the productions costs as compared to the increase demand caused by biofuel production?
I don't think biofules are the big boogeyman here.
Having said that. This is indeed problematic, at least for Bangladeshis and other poor folks, not the American fat cats with their fancy color TVs: