For Global Warming Campaigners, 2013 Was The Year From Hell

Dantès said:
I doubt it, there is nothing in that article that says anything about climate, snow in Israel isn't climate it's weather! And celebrating 1200 new coal plants in developing countries is nothing but coal lobbying and coal propaganda. But I wouldn't expect a dumbass such as yourself to pick up on nuances, because you're too busy pretending this Lawrence Solomon is an environmentalist or who knows what at this point. Maybe he is another fake scientist just like you! As long as the water level on the Atlantic coast keeps rising, it really doesn't matter whether the globe gets a 1/2 degree warmer next year or not, the damage will be done. But neither you nor he are really talking about anything long term, you're both talking about the snow in Jerusalem two weeks ago! That's not climate, that is weather. Learn the difference, mr science!
Click to expand...

I am sorry but I can't take idiots like you seriously.
 
Celticguy said:
Well it was not surprising given the dirth of science to support it.
Do you all know that with one notable exception, so-called greenhouses cannot cause greenhouse effect without breaking the 2nd law of thermodynamics ?
That one exception is H2O and what is unique about it is that it can change its form freely in the atmosphere (solid to liquid to gas and back the other way (which provides the external work needed per definirion of the 2nd law).
Maybe some day warmer scientists will present some evidence to support their claims. But no repeatable experimentation has been providded to date, only computer modelling.
Click to expand...

That is total crap by the way, I shouldn't have to tell you as the internet is full of sites that explain why. I am a climate sceptic but I also understand science even though I hated doing thermodynamics at university.
 
evince said:
says some GUY on the internets.


why tell us all your sceincey stuff.

start convincing the scientists of the world and convince them if you are so correct
Click to expand...

Mark Twain said it best. "One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives."
 
evince said:
so tell me why you guys cant get your politically motivated science accepted by science?
Click to expand...

You truly do have the memory of a goldfish.

Argument from authority is the first line of defence for people like you. You need to understand the asymmetry between proposing a theory and refuting one. To propose a theory about climate you need to cobble together a vast number of different disciplines and produce a consistent result. To destroy such a theory you can be as ignorant as you like about most of the theory but simply be able to produce a single flaw, this is the principle of falsifiability. You could say to me that all swans are white, yet it is logically possible to falsify it by simply observing a single black swan.

Aristotle claimed objects fall with a speed proportional to their weight. This was accepted for nearly two thousand years until Galileo disproved it with a simple experiment. Anyone could do the experiment, so why did the world believe Aristotle for so long? I assume it’s the “taboo” of arguing with the authority. Even Galileo got himself into trouble with the authority of the Catholic Church, and it took them 500 years to admit Galileo was right.
Click to expand...

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...ate-Policy-Blows-Engine&p=1379911#post1379911
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top