Ford Testimony

you can tell she is lying because her lips are moving.

"Eponephine in the brain"?

yea ok "dr." Ford, thank you for your scientific explanation of why you can remember certain things and not others

:rofl2:

could someone get this woman a shrink

Really curious line of Conservative attack here...are you trying to alienate people?
 
They aren't being tricked by anything; they are willful liars in the entire affair pretending this woman isn't a DNC attack dog in a desperate attempt to smear Kavanaugh.

the democrats are liars. people like rana and think1 are just dupes. personally I find fools worse than liars. fools are weak.
 
She looks scared to death.

I don't know how this plays. She absolutely does not want to be there.

Awww...the poor dear. Kavanaugh is being smeared and having his character assaulted. But you don't care about that part do you snowflake?
 
There's not been an investigation into these claims, so nothing's been determined.

You just don't want to believe women because you're a garbage person and liar.

They've been shown to be false allegations.

I don't believe drunken sluts like Ford just like I don't believe people like Crystal Mangum that falsely accused the Duke Lacrosse team of rape.

You automatically believed her because you're another Hillary supporter that can't stand you got your ass kicked in an election.
 
I don't believe drunken sluts like Ford just like I don't believe people like Crystal Mangum that falsely accused the Duke Lacrosse team of rape.

Whatabout is a KGB tactics meant to deflect from failed arguments.

Keep calling her a 'drunken slut'...that's really helping your cause and totally doesn't make you sound desperate at all. LOL.


You automatically believed her because you're another Hillary supporter that can't stand you got your ass kicked in an election.

Clinton won the popular vote by 3,000,000.
 
No they haven't because no investigation of them has occurred.

Yet you believe the accusations to be true despite claiming no investigation has occurred. How can they be true without the investigation you say hasn't occurred?
 
If you want to see rehearsed, check out that Fox News interview with Brett from earlier in the week...

He's never going to be able to match her sincerity or establish his credibility after her. She set the bar too high. He's going to come off as unsympathetic, disconnected, clueless.
Judge K was spontaneous.
you have no idea what you are talking about except for the fact if we do this by emotions, Judge K loses
 
Yet you believe the accusations to be true despite claiming no investigation has occurred.

So this is very easily solved:

HAVE AN INVESTIGATION.

That will determine whether or not the accusation is false.

Your argument's natural conclusion is that an investigation needs to occur.


How can they be true without the investigation you say hasn't occurred?

So then let's have an investigation.

Then the results of that investigation will let us know who can spike the ball.
 
Back
Top