Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

[USFREEDOM911]

They did it before with other nominees.

How many??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I'm a lying piece POS

.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

they reopened the FBI investigation of Hilary right before an election on new information



they need to reopen Kavs vetting investigation on new information

An unsubstantiated accusation, is not "information"; you dried up lying cunt.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

what the fuck is wrong with me?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I'm an asshole

.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I'm a shut-in?

.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

We aren’t stating it’s for criminal purposes, cool your jets, it’s for details of the allegations. If they had the details, why was t the committee made aware? I’m sure Harris and a few others would have wanted to question him about the matter.

What fucking details, you ignorant cunt?

Ford doesn't even have any details for them to look at, except for her assertion.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You are wrong. They do not “investigate” nominees. They do background checks. This is not in their jurisdiction.

But let’s say for the sake of argument that the FBI were to investigate. And let’s say they know of your fact based world and tap you to do the investigation

How would you start this investigation? Where would YOU start?

It looks like they want the FBI to take the year book, track down everyone in it, and ask them about what they know.

Now this would take "MONTHS" which is exactly what the liberals want; but they're to dishonest to say so.

This has nothing to do with FACTS; but has everything to do with liberals wanting vengeance, over Trump being elected.

 

[LV426]

FBI says they don’t do ancient history.

Well, they investigated decades-old assault charges against Catholic Priests.

Why is this any different?

 

[LV426]

It looks like they want the FBI to take the year book, track down everyone in it, and ask them about what they know.

That would be a thorough investigation.

So why are you opposed to it?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Well, they investigated decades-old assault charges against Catholic Priests.

Why is this any different?

Which has nothing to do with a SCOTUS nomination; but please keep praying for something to happen, which is exactly what an un-American would be working towards.

 

[LV426]

Now this would take "MONTHS" which is exactly what the liberals want; but they're to dishonest to say so.

I don't want him seated, period.

Why the rush to get Bretty seated?

It's to protect Trump and the GOP from Mueller, isn't it?

Why not just be honest and say that's why you have to seat him now?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

That would be a thorough investigation.

So why are you opposed to it?

Because it has nothing to do with an unsupported accusation.

Just admit that you're not an American and are working to undermine the Constitution.

 

[LV426]

Which has nothing to do with a SCOTUS nominatio

So what?

In both cases, we're talking about decades-old allegations of assault against teens.

So how are they not similar in that regard?

Do you not think those teenagers were assaulted by Catholic priests?

 

[LV426]

Because it has nothing to do with an unsupported accusation.

You just said it did. Questioning the people in the high school at that time is absolutely related to the assaults that took place when they were enrolled there.

You can't even keep your argument straight from post-to-post.

 

[LV426]

Just admit that you're not an American and are working to undermine the Constitution.

You're the ones who are rushing to get him seated, obviously because you need him to protect Trump and the GOP from the conclusions of Mueller's investigation.

Why not be honest about that?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

I don't want him seated, period.

Why the rush to get Bretty seated?

It's to protect Trump and the GOP from Mueller, isn't it?

Why not just be honest and say that's why you have to seat him now?

And that is exactly what's driving this entire faux accusation; but at least you've finally admitted that this entire thing is bullshit.

Ford was told not to testify; because the DNC is afraid that she'll reveal who first approached her and asked her to lie.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Which has nothing to do with a SCOTUS nominatio

Which has nothing to do with a SCOTUS nomination; but please keep praying for something to happen, which is exactly what an un-American would be working towards.

So what?

In both cases, we're talking about decades-old allegations of assault against teens.

So how are they not similar in that regard?

Do you not think those teenagers were assaulted by Catholic priests?

OH-OH, you failed to quote my entire comment and left the "n" off of nomination.

So using what passes for logic, in your little snowflake world, this proves that you're NOT an American and that I was correct in showing that you're just a DNC race-baiting plant, who's being paid by the Nazi Soros.

So suck it bitch.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

You just said it did. Questioning the people in the high school at that time is absolutely related to the assaults that took place when they were enrolled there.

You can't even keep your argument straight from post-to-post.

This is nothing more then a liberal hope that they can delay this, until after their belief of winning the Senate occurs.

OH, so if I contact the FBI and make the accusation that you've threatened the President; but I have nothing to substantiate the accusation, the FBI should still investigate you??

You're an idiot and you continue to prove it, with your continued stupidity.

 

[LV426]

And that is exactly what's driving this entire faux accusation; but at least you've finally admitted that this entire thing is bullshit.

It's not bullshit.

She took a lie detector.

He refuses.

It's obvious why.