Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

[USFREEDOM911]

Why can't the FBI do that?

They did it for Thomas/Hill 27 years ago.

Why is this any different?

They've already said that there is no evidence for them to investigate.

and stop crying.

 

[LV426]

Then you should have your pixels deleted; but I expect you to be figuratively weeping and crying, about a few milliseconds after your body stops functioning.

You believe in fairies, cloud beings, giant rabbits that shit chocolate eggs, and a home invader who dresses in red robes and comes down the chimney at night to put presents in a sock.

And you're not even an American. You're playing pretend on a message board to dupe simple-minded Conservatives into supporting your shitty foreign agenda.

 

[LV426]

They had no plans to confirm Garland--no need to hold hearings at all. 67 days is the average for SC--this is longer than average.

Then Brett doesn't get a confirmation either until after the election, when the people have had a chance to weigh in.

 

[LV426]

But the people are weighing in, through the people they voted into office and that includes President Trump.

That was a lifetime ago. 2 years, pal. That was a long time ago. Barack Obama was re-elected in 2012 and you wouldn't let him fill a seat in 2016, even though he had already been President for 7 years, winning two elections.

You said that the people needed to weigh in. And they did. And you got Gorsuch.

Now, there's another election coming up and a controversial nominee who is under seemingly multiple investigations, has already lied under oath about his time as a Bush the Dumber swamp monster, and is credibly accused of attempted rape when he was a privileged, entitled youth.

So we need to put pause on this whole thing until after an investigation, testimony in front of the JC, and the election in November.

It's only fair.

 

[LV426]

You really need to start practicing saying "Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh"; because he's going to be on the SCOTUS bench for a very looooooooooooooooooong time.

What if you're wrong?

 

[LV426]

Irrelevant

You don't get to decide that in this conversation unilaterally.

Why Bretty? Of all the Conservative judges out there, why him?

Obviously, it's because he thinks the President doesn't have to answer for his crimes.

If there is evidence for criminal conviction there is evidence for impeachment.

Not if the party controlling Congress is actively obstructing any impeachment proceedings or the investigation itself, which they've already done.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Merrick fucking Garland.

[translation]
This is about REVENGE and nothing else; but I'm to big of a pussy to say so.
[/translation]

 

[LV426]

They've already said that there is no evidence for them to investigate.

Yet, they did 27 years ago.

So it would seem the answer is flip-flopperish.

 

[reagansghost]

[translation]
This is about REVENGE and nothing else; but I'm to big of a pussy to say so.
[/translation]

gawd you're lame

 

[LV426]

[translation]
This is about REVENGE and nothing else; but I'm to big of a pussy to say so.
[/translation]

Of course it's revenge. But it is also patriotic. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

She didn't mention him by name, she just mentioned the attack he and his homoerotic friend participated in against her.




And the evidence that he's guilty is her account of the situation.

So that stands as the evidence he has yet to refute.

Same thing happened with Roy Moore...he turned out to be guilty as shit too.

For some reason, Conservatives love rapists and pedophiles. You keep nominating them. How come?

So, like the rest of the JPP liberals, you have NOTHING; except denigrating insults.

How un-American of you.

And when was Moore found guilty of anything; because all of the supposed evidence seems to have faded into the sunset??

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Those don't pertain to a SCOTUS nominee

Those don't pertain to a SCOTUS nominee; but someone who's not an American would just keep repeating the lie, in hopes they can influence voters.

Hmmm, hasn't this been tried before; by non-Americans??

Says who?

Just you.

No one else.

So now you're at that part of the debate where you start arbitrarily establishing standards that you'll end up redefining again.

If lie detectors are good enough for Republicans to use in the White House, they're good enough for the Senate JC to use.

Which is what you're doing here. You're literally doing that.

But the incidents you've referred to, have nothing to do with a SCOTUS nominee; so your apples / oranges attempt is just another failure on your part.

 

[reagansghost]

But the incidents you've referred to, have nothing to do with a SCOTUS nominee; so your apples / oranges attempt is just another failure on your part.

you post like a mental patient

 

[USFREEDOM911]

And as an un-American DNC agitator plant, you keep ignoring that the FBI has said they have no reason to "investigate" this accusation and that it should be a local PD investigation.

And as an un-American DNC agitator plant, you keep ignoring that the FBI has said they have no reason to "investigate" this accusation and that it should be a local PD investigation.

Why hasn't she asked her local PD to look into this??

Whether they think there's reason to or not doesn't even matter.

Without an independent investigation, no hearing could take place because no one investigated everything.

That's why Ford won't testify until after an investigation. Because Conservatives make shit up all the time. Like you on these boards.

Because she lives in Palo Alto and this happened in Northern Virginia.

So now it doesn't matter if the PD think there's nothing to investigate!!

Are you trying to suggest that she can't file a complaint with the PD where this was SUPPOSED to have occurred??

Looks like she was given her chance to testify, is refusing to do so, and the nomination can now move forward.

Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh

Sounds really good, HUH!!

 

[reagansghost]

So now it doesn't matter if the PD think there's nothing to investigate!!

Are you trying to suggest that she can't file a complaint with the PD where this was SUPPOSED to have occurred??

Looks like she was given her chance to testify, is refusing to do so, and the nomination can now move forward.

Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh

Sounds really good, HUH!!

are you a KKKer shitbag?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

NO, the FBI has said it

NO, the FBI has said it; unless you can provide a comment from the FBI that contradicts their decision!!

If investigating the truth is so important, then what is Ford worried about; seeing all she has to do is show up and tell the truth??

So what? They don't get to decide that. And they investigated similar accusations back in 1991, so the precedent exists.

Seems to me you're really, really, really afraid of the FBI investigating because you know already they're going to find overwhelming evidence Brett and his homoerotic buddy tried to rape that girl.

Evidently they did and have decide that; but don't let that stop you from continuing to cry about it.

Seems to me that you're really afraid that Ford will be shown to be a liar and that the DNC will just cement the idea that they're a bunch of crybaby losers.

 

[LV426]

So now it doesn't matter if the PD think there's nothing to investigate!!

Nope. Doesn't matter.

Are you trying to suggest that she can't file a complaint with the PD where this was SUPPOSED to have occurred??

I don't know the process for this type of thing, but in the past, the FBI has investigated. They did that with Thomas/Hill. Why is this any different?

Looks like she was given her chance to testify, is refusing to do so, and the nomination can now move forward.

I'd say it's even money the nomination is pulled by the end of the week.

 

[LV426]

Evidently they di

No they didn't. Not this allegation. They probably investigated him for others because he's a serial rapist and abuser.

Seems to me that you're really afraid that Ford will be shown to be a liar and that the DNC will just cement the idea that they're a bunch of crybaby losers

She's the one calling for the FBI investigation.

You're the ones who don't want the FBI investigation.

So it's pretty obvious what is going on here.

 

[canceled.2021.3]

there must be other girls they are afraid of


the American people don't want this guy ion the scotus


so the republicans will refuse to fully vet him and place him on the court after they took Russian money funneled through the NRA


they are Russian bought on sold


now we will have a political Scotus the people don't trust


this will destroy the nation

I don’t care if you trust them. You will take it

You have no choice. There is nothing you can do.

How does it make you feel to be so powerless

I just need Trump to replace Ginsburg and/or Breyer and this country is protected from liberalism for a generation.

At that pint I don’t give a fuck if Democrats win some elections because the Supreme Court will be there to shut them down. T

That is why the democrat party is so scared. They are losing the courts

HEIL TRUMP

SUCK IT BITCH

 

[USFREEDOM911]

He's a federal employee, so it's definitely a federal offense.




No they didn't. Not for this. Were they investigating him for something else? Why does this guy have so many investigations into him?




The FBI has not investigated this accusation of Ford's. Are you thinking of a different investigation? How many investigations is Bretty under!? Should a nominee for SCOTUS even be considered if they're under investigations? Trump said Hillary shouldn't be President because she was investigated by the FBI; so I assume you think Brett shouldn't be a SCOTUS judge either because he's under investigation?

Wrong and even suggesting this, shows your level of stupidity; unless you want to provide something that says the FBI is supposed to be the ones who "investigate" a Federal employee.

And then you double down and try to equate the POTUS to the SCOTUS.

Your desperation is showing.