Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

USFREEDOM911 said:
Wrong and even suggesting this, shows your level of stupidity; unless you want to provide something that says the FBI is supposed to be the ones who "investigate" a Federal employee. :palm:

And then you double down and try to equate the POTUS to the SCOTUS.

Your desperation is showing. :D

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

god this is a stupid post
 
LV426 said:
You believe in fairies, cloud beings, giant rabbits that shit chocolate eggs, and a home invader who dresses in red robes and comes down the chimney at night to put presents in a sock.

And you're not even an American. You're playing pretend on a message board to dupe simple-minded Conservatives into supporting your shitty foreign agenda.
Click to expand...

Oh so were back to the un-American accusations; but using your "logic", you've shown that it's you who are not an American
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Wrong and even suggesting this, shows your level of stupidity; unless you want to provide something that says the FBI is supposed to be the ones who "investigate" a Federal employee.
Click to expand...

They investigated Thomas 27 years ago, they can investigate Bretty today.
 
professor nut-bag is having second thoughts about sharing her fairy tale, she bit off more than she could chew, much like her hero Hillary

Nowhere to run and hide now "Professor Ford" come out come out wherever you are :rofl2:
 
Getin the ring said:
professor nut-bag is having second thoughts about sharing her fairy tale, she bit off more than she could chew, much like her hero Hillary
Click to expand...

She is willing to testify after an investigation...as anyone would. You wouldn't want to testify in court without the conclusions of an investigation to which you can testify, so why is this any different?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But the people are weighing in, through the people they voted into office and that includes President Trump.
Click to expand...

USFREEDOM911 said:
But the people are weighing in, through the people they voted into office and that includes President Trump.

You really need to start practicing saying "Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh"; because he's going to be on the SCOTUS bench for a very looooooooooooooooooong time. :D
Click to expand...
LV426 said:
That was a lifetime ago. 2 years, pal. That was a long time ago. Barack Obama was re-elected in 2012 and you wouldn't let him fill a seat in 2016, even though he had already been President for 7 years, winning two elections.

You said that the people needed to weigh in. And they did. And you got Gorsuch.

Now, there's another election coming up and a controversial nominee who is under seemingly multiple investigations, has already lied under oath about his time as a Bush the Dumber swamp monster, and is credibly accused of attempted rape when he was a privileged, entitled youth.

So we need to put pause on this whole thing until after an investigation, testimony in front of the JC, and the election in November.

It's only fair.
Click to expand...

2 years is a lifetime??

You are truly unhinged and delusional. :palm:

Now you're proving that liberals want to rewrite what the word "credibly" really means; because the accusation is not credible.

C'mon and just admit it, this is about VENGENCE; because at least then you could be considered to have at least a modicum of honesty.

:facepalm:
 
LV426 said:
You don't get to decide that in this conversation unilaterally.

Why Bretty? Of all the Conservative judges out there, why him?

Obviously, it's because he thinks the President doesn't have to answer for his crimes.




Not if the party controlling Congress is actively obstructing any impeachment proceedings or the investigation itself, which they've already done.
Click to expand...

Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh. :good4u:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
2 years is a lifetime??
Click to expand...

In politics, yes.

You squandered whatever goodwill you narrowly won (thanks to the Electoral College) with Gorsuch. That was yours. So now that we are closer to an election than we were back in 2016, we must wait until at least after this election, so that the people have a chance to have their voice heard.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Now you're proving that liberals want to rewrite what the word "credibly" really means; because the accusation is not credible.
Click to expand...

It is when she no longer remains anonymous, and submits to a lie detector.

Your guy won't submit to a lie detector. His friend won't even testify under oath in his defense.

It's obvious why.
 
LV426 said:
Yet, they did 27 years ago.

So it would seem the answer is flip-flopperish.
Click to expand...


So...………………??

27 years ago, they looked at the available evidence and decided there was enough to warrant an investigation.

27 years later, they've looked at the available evidence and have decided that there isn't enough to warrant an investigation.

:dealwithit:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
C'mon and just admit it, this is about VENGENCE; because at least then you could be considered to have at least a modicum of honesty.
Click to expand...

I did say it was about revenge.

It's also about patriotism.

The two aren't mutually exclusive in this case.

Maybe you should be honest as to why you have this urgency to seat Brett the amateur rapist now?

What is the urgency? It's to protect Trump, isn't it? Be honest. I was honest with you.
 
Maybe she is ashamed, her two children are now the butt of jokes, and her husband "Russell" has to now explain to everyone he knows why his wife is a nut-bag.
You see we all have little secrets from High School that we would rather keep to ourselves, young and dumb. We certainly wouldn't want some blowhard broadcasting to the world events from a party, "he was smoking weed", "he fell off a chair dancing like an idiot", She drank too much and was huddled over the toilet all night"
we have all been there, and professor nut-bag here, omg what a twat

They will be a hoot at parties, assuming they ever get invited to another one.
"Watch what you say to these two"
Her students are laughing behind her back, "oh you have a class with Professor Nut-bag"

and all because she is another triggered liberal that just couldn't accept the fact that America voted for Donald J Trump

#MAGA baby, it's a nice time to be a conservative, WIN WIN WIN is all we do lately

now could someone just find Ruth Baders plug
 
Last edited:
LV426 said:
She is willing to testify after an investigation...as anyone would. You wouldn't want to testify in court without the conclusions of an investigation to which you can testify, so why is this any different?
Click to expand...

How fucking more wrong could you be in one day?

It isn’t even a challenge to fist you. You make it too easy.

She isn’t testifying in court. Why does she need an FBI investigation to be completed before she can recount her story?

What will the FBI change?

All theses demands for the FBI to investigate do is prove that your only goal is to delay the nomination because you think you are retaking the Senate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top