Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying

Hopefully political sense because pushing him through after making such a big deal about not letting Garland get a vote will result in them getting creamed in November. But at this point, Conservatives are going to get creamed regardless of what they do with Bretty. And if they push him through, the Democrats can simply impeach him because he lied under oath when he testified about his time as a Bush the Dumber swamp monster.

So Conservatives have quite a dilemma now. Push through a rapist and watch the women all vote Democratic, or don't push the rapist through and watch all the Conservatives stay at home. In either case, they are fucked because Bretty can be impeached for lying to the Senate Committee about his time as a Bush the Dumber swamp monster.

First, you are an idiot or a liar. Even Ford isn't claiming he raped her.

Second, in this country it is innocent until proven guilty. She doesn't recall where or when this incident occurred. She doesn't remember much of anything about the night. The three other people she claims were at this party have all stated they have no idea what she is talking about.

Third, she now is refusing to testify, despite saying that is what she wanted. Why is she suddenly hiding? Oh yeah, because this whole thing is about trying to delay the vote until after the election.
 
Now you're proving that liberals want to rewrite what the word "credibly" really means; because the accusation is not credible.

2 years is a lifetime??

You are truly unhinged and delusional. :palm:

Now you're proving that liberals want to rewrite what the word "credibly" really means; because the accusation is not credible.

C'mon and just admit it, this is about VENGENCE; because at least then you could be considered to have at least a modicum of honesty.

:facepalm:

It is when she no longer remains anonymous, and submits to a lie detector.

Your guy won't submit to a lie detector. His friend won't even testify under oath in his defense.

It's obvious why.

It's obvious that she has no proof and is now afraid of committing perjury, in a Congressional hearing. :D
 
So she doesn't know where it happened, when it happened, how many people were in the room, who was at the party, how she got there, how she got home, yet she is positive that it was Kavanaugh that was the perpetrator? Curious how anyone could possible defend that.

Along the same terms that victims of childhood assault by priests defend their accusations.

Do you not believe the victims of Catholic sexual abuse?

Because it doesn't sound to me like you do.
 
C'mon and just admit it, this is about VENGENCE; because at least then you could be considered to have at least a modicum of honesty.

2 years is a lifetime??

You are truly unhinged and delusional. :palm:

Now you're proving that liberals want to rewrite what the word "credibly" really means; because the accusation is not credible.

C'mon and just admit it, this is about VENGENCE; because at least then you could be considered to have at least a modicum of honesty.

:facepalm:

I did say it was about revenge.

It's also about patriotism.

The two aren't mutually exclusive in this case.

Maybe you should be honest as to why you have this urgency to seat Brett the amateur rapist now?

What is the urgency? It's to protect Trump, isn't it? Be honest. I was honest with you.

How is "vengeance " also about patriotism??
<this should be good>
 
And they got Gorsuch. That was the result of that election.

Now, we're 7 weeks out from another election, and the American people need to have a voice here.




You sure about that? Sotomayor and Kagan both had more than 60 votes in their final confirmation vote in the Senate.

You don't know what you're talking about. You're just making all this shit up off the top of your head, aren't you? Be honest.

You don't get a voice, boy. First, there is a question as to whether or not you're a person. Secondly, even if you are a person, you're not valuable enough to matter on this issue.

We're not 7 weeks out from a Presidential election. I bet you didn't know that, did you?
 
Maybe she is ashamed, her two children are now the butt of jokes, and her husband "Russell" has to now explain to everyone he knows why his wife is a nut-bag.
You see we all have little secrets from High School that we would rather keep to ourselves, young and dumb. We certainly wouldn't want some blowhard broadcasting to the world events from a party, "he was smoking weed", "he fell off a chair dancing like an idiot", She drank too much and was huddled over the toilet all night"
we have all been there, and professor nut-bag here, omg what a twat

They will be a hoot at parties, assuming they ever get invited to another one.
"Watch what you say to these two"
Her students are laughing behind her back, "oh you have a class with Professor Nut-bag"

and all because she is another triggered liberal that just couldn't accept the fact that America voted for Donald J Trump

#MAGA baby, it's a nice time to be a conservative, WIN WIN WIN is all we do lately

now could someone just find Ruth Baders plug

I feel sorry for her husband, who is now finding out that his wife was a drunken slut. :palm:
 
How fucking more wrong could you be in one day?

It isn’t even a challenge to fist you. You make it too easy.

She isn’t testifying in court. Why does she need an FBI investigation to be completed before she can recount her story?

What will the FBI change?

All theses demands for the FBI to investigate do is prove that your only goal is to delay the nomination because you think you are retaking the Senate

LV has already admitted that this is about REVENGE.

:facepalm:
 
You see, lying to the FBI is a crime, so they only need to take statements from those three who Ford claims were in the room... see how they respond when lying has consequence.

Please list 10 questions the FBI should ask them based on the information we know
 
She doesn't recall where or when this incident occurred. She doesn't remember much of anything about the night. The three other people she claims were at this party have all stated they have no idea what she is talking about.

Most victims of Catholic sexual assault by priests can't recall those details, either. So do you not believe them? It's the same thing we're talking about here; teenage victims of sexual assault coming forward decades after the assault took place. So you'll believe those people, but you won't believe Ford? Why? Or, do you not believe those victims either?


Third, she now is refusing to testify

No, she'll testify after an investigation is completed. You know, this part:

Second, in this country it is innocent until proven guilty

That's what investigations do, right!? That's their purpose, no?


Why is she suddenly hiding?

Because of posters like Get in the Ring who are making veiled threats against her family anonymously on the internet like a bunch of punk ass cowards.

Seriously, you people are fucking losers. And I know one day this shit is going to catch up with you, you're going to beg for help or accommodation, and it just won't be there for you.

That's the path you're on.
 
And they got Gorsuch. That was the result of that election.

Now, we're 7 weeks out from another election, and the American people need to have a voice here.

You sure about that? Sotomayor and Kagan both had more than 60 votes in their final confirmation vote in the Senate.

You don't know what you're talking about. You're just making all this shit up off the top of your head, aren't you? Be honest.

Is that the way you felt about Garland? That the confirmation vote should wait until after the people have a voice in the election? I thought you were complaining because Garland was not given a hearing and vote. Now you are arguing the people need a voice. Partisanship dictating your feelings?

Sotomayor and Kagan had the votes, Garland did not. That is the job of the whips (and media) to count the votes in advance. If they don't have the votes they usually delay or cancel. If Garland had the votes the committee could have voted to call for hearings.
 
Why, though? There had to be a reason. He didn't just pull the name out of a hat, did he?




Yes we do because we've read his opinions and statements. Particularly those around Nixon.




How do you figure? The two have nothing to do with one another.

I don’t believe you. You didn’t know that Ford had VOLUNTARILY reached out to the Washington Post in July
 
You don't get a voice, boy. First, there is a question as to whether or not you're a person. Secondly, even if you are a person, you're not valuable enough to matter on this issue.

We're not 7 weeks out from a Presidential election. I bet you didn't know that, did you?

You make shit up about yourself to make you seem more credible on anonymous internet message boards.
 
You make shit up about yourself to make you seem more credible on anonymous internet message boards.

I've offered a way for the anonymity to go away and you refuse to be a man. You claim you're going to do all sorts of things yet that involves actually doing something you've shown you're don't have the guts to do.

Based on your standard, the account I heard about you being a dick sucking faggot has to be true because you fail to take a lie detector test. It's obvious why.
 
Back
Top