Because Conservatives simply don't know how to talk to the FBI without lying.
Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying
- Thread starter volsrock
- Start date
Because Conservatives simply don't know how to talk to the FBI without lying.
If Trump or Grassley asked them to investigate this incident...THEY WOULD DO IT IN AN INSTANT...you fucking idiot.
And...both of them...
a) Should do it
b) Would do it in a second if it were a liberal Democrat.
Just sayin'!
TOP
Retired Teacher
She's welcome to testify.....many different options....none accepted....
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Apparently you are the one lacking any facts snowflake. So let's set the Anita Hill record straight. One, very few bought her absurd asinine story. Two, she didn't suffer a damn thing. She has made millions off her lies.
FACTS:
In 1991, Hill submitted a confidential statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that Thomas had sexually harassed her 10 years earlier, when they were both single. The FBI had already investigated the charges and given the committee what was called an inconclusive report. The committee decided not to pursue the matter. But two days before the full Senate was expected to confirm Thomas, Hill's statement was leaked to reporters.
"It was only after they had been leaked illegally, to the public and the press, that then it's outta hand. It's in the feeding frenzy," Thomas told "60 Minutes" Correspondent Steve Kroft in 2007 profile.
Sound familiar people? Thomas's outstanding rebuttal:
"This is a circus. It's a national disgrace," Thomas said during the hearing. "It is a high-tech lynching for uppity blacks who in any way deign to think for themselves and it is a message that unless you kowtow to an old order you will be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U.S. Senate rather than hung from a tree."
That is exactly what we have seen here; a three ring circus brought to us by the repugnant and desperate Democratic Party of the Jackass.
the FBI doesn't work like that, you feel for the democrats trick, it's very sad.
kavanaugh has already testified under felony penalty, same thing with judge with his statement. democrats could have asked him any question they wanted while he was under oath. they declined. ford the liar still refuses to talk under oath.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
False. Mark Judge has NOT testified under oath. Oddly, the GOP doesn't want him to. I wonder why that is, mmmm?
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...udge-testify-brett-kavanaugh-witness-subpoena
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
Trump can’t ask the FBI to start or stop an investigation
That would be obstruction of justice
he still submitted a statement under felony penalty. so you are wrong
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Sure thing, Grind! Let's see your proof. I posted a link... show us yours.
My comment was that if Grassley or Trump asked the FBI to re-open the investigation into Kavanaugh's background THEY WOULD DO SO IN AN INSTANT.
AND THE FBI WOULD DO IT!
Stop with your bullshit.
One side is trying to get more information...one side is determined not to get anything else revealed.
YOUR SIDE IS THE ONE DUCKING...and intelligent people understand why.
You are the one falling for tricks.
link directly from the senate judicary committee:
any more brain busters?
multiple people contacted, all testifying under penalty of felony. all defending kavanaugh. so far ford hasn't done one thing under oath. she's a liar.
Trump COULD ask the FBI to do so.
Maybe he shouldn't...but he certainly CAN do so.
Grassley CAN.
Grassley should be doing so.
Judge HAS not testified under oath.
Owl is correct. YOU are wrong.
You keep changing wording and comments...and you are not particularly adept at doing it.
Judge submitted a letter essentially saying "this didn't happen...or if it did, it did not involve Kavanaugh."
And you expect that to be enough...and to accept it as the truth?
Are you fucking insane?
If Dr. Ford submitted a letter saying "I was assaulted and the person assaulting me was Brett Kavanaugh"...WOULD YOU BE SO FUCKING CAVALIER AS TO SAY SHE TESTIFIED...AND THAT IS IT?
Do the world a favor and be sure not to send your genes forward into the human gene pool.
If that is the case why isn’t Dr. Ford’s letter considered testimony? Testifying before the committee under oath is a whole different ballgame then submitting a letter. Funny, Judge recalls so many things from that era and writes about them, but can’t remember this incident. Hmmmm
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
You think the "penalty of perjury" proves that they're not lying? What about that Flynn guy?
Thx for posting your evidence.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wa...e0fe22-bb55-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html
He can recall so many other things, but not this attack, hmmmm