BidenPresident
Verified User
Still waiting for you to show where a main stream media source used the term "left wing extremist" in reference to a Democrat.
sfssd
Still waiting for you to show where a main stream media source used the term "left wing extremist" in reference to a Democrat.
The Trump team lied twice just today as to the size and location of one of their properties. They displayed a rendering of a property shown as 72 stories, yet in actuality it is 62 floors. Theproperty was indicated to be right next door to the NYSE, it isn't.
Then we have trump apartment which financial statements showed to be 30,000 sq ft, but in reality its 10,000.
The lies never end.
sfssd
Still waiting for you to show where a mains stream media source used the term "left wing extremist" in reference to a Democrat.
chcgh
Hahaha, we will see. You will just call the appellate judges corrupt when it doesn't happen.
eat shit you fucking troll
Still waiting for you to show where a mains stream media source used the term "left wing extremist" in reference to a Democrat.
Please explain just why this will be overturned. I doubt you have a clue!
dfsdh
Still waiting for you to show where a main stream media source used the term "left wing extremist" in reference to a Democrat.
Because he wants it to be. Tucker and Bannon said it, so it must be true. All those videos of Trumpys attacking the capital and the police are fake. Trump's conversations with Georgia election officials demanding they overturn the election were faked. Trump stealing a truckload of classified documents was no crime. Trump being involved in organizing fake electors was harmless and legal. Trump has a right to avoid paying his taxes. His lying is just a harmless personal foible.
The Trumpys cannot be reached with facts and evidence.
sdfsddfg
I haven't seen any proof that they knowingly lied about their properties. But let's assume they are lying. Is it a crime? How so? If it is fraud, who were the victims?
Fraud needs a victim halfwit. Who was it? It certainly wasn't the bank.
Did you know there is a disclaimer on the documents?
![]()
Because the case does not meet the hurdle for fraud. There are no victims here. There is no proof the statements were willfully false in order to defraud. it's really that simple.
Only a moron like Engeron, the nude selfie taking jurist, could be dumb enough to not have even allowed the case to go to trial.
The banks have been shown to have lost over 100,000,000 in interest they would have received had they charged the proper interest rates.
Sweetheart this is a civil case, not criminal and the burden of proof is different.
Please follow what is happening in this trial because you just make up shit without knowing anything.
The banks have been shown to have lost over 100,000,000 in interest they would have received had they charged the proper interest rates.